GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc9209



Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Nottingham Request for Comments: 9209 Fastly Category: Standards Track P. Sikora ISSN: 2070-1721 Google

                                                             June 2022
            The Proxy-Status HTTP Response Header Field

Abstract

 This document defines the Proxy-Status HTTP response field to convey
 the details of an intermediary's response handling, including
 generated errors.

Status of This Memo

 This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9209.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
 Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
 in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

 1.  Introduction
   1.1.  Notational Conventions
 2.  The Proxy-Status HTTP Field
   2.1.  Proxy-Status Parameters
     2.1.1.  error
     2.1.2.  next-hop
     2.1.3.  next-protocol
     2.1.4.  received-status
     2.1.5.  details
   2.2.  Defining New Proxy-Status Parameters
   2.3.  Proxy Error Types
     2.3.1.  DNS Timeout
     2.3.2.  DNS Error
     2.3.3.  Destination Not Found
     2.3.4.  Destination Unavailable
     2.3.5.  Destination IP Prohibited
     2.3.6.  Destination IP Unroutable
     2.3.7.  Connection Refused
     2.3.8.  Connection Terminated
     2.3.9.  Connection Timeout
     2.3.10. Connection Read Timeout
     2.3.11. Connection Write Timeout
     2.3.12. Connection Limit Reached
     2.3.13. TLS Protocol Error
     2.3.14. TLS Certificate Error
     2.3.15. TLS Alert Received
     2.3.16. HTTP Request Error
     2.3.17. HTTP Request Denied
     2.3.18. HTTP Incomplete Response
     2.3.19. HTTP Response Header Section Too Large
     2.3.20. HTTP Response Header Field Line Too Large
     2.3.21. HTTP Response Body Too Large
     2.3.22. HTTP Response Trailer Section Too Large
     2.3.23. HTTP Response Trailer Field Line Too Large
     2.3.24. HTTP Response Transfer-Coding Error
     2.3.25. HTTP Response Content-Coding Error
     2.3.26. HTTP Response Timeout
     2.3.27. HTTP Upgrade Failed
     2.3.28. HTTP Protocol Error
     2.3.29. Proxy Internal Response
     2.3.30. Proxy Internal Error
     2.3.31. Proxy Configuration Error
     2.3.32. Proxy Loop Detected
   2.4.  Defining New Proxy Error Types
 3.  IANA Considerations
 4.  Security Considerations
 5.  References
   5.1.  Normative References
   5.2.  Informative References
 Authors' Addresses

1. Introduction

 HTTP intermediaries (see Section 3.7 of [HTTP]) -- including both
 forward proxies and gateways (also known as "reverse proxies") --
 have become an increasingly significant part of HTTP deployments.  In
 particular, reverse proxies and content delivery networks (CDNs) form
 part of the critical infrastructure of many websites.
 Typically, HTTP intermediaries forward requests towards the origin
 server (inbound) and then forward their responses back to clients
 (outbound).  However, if an error occurs before a response is
 obtained from an inbound server, the response is often generated by
 the intermediary itself.
 HTTP accommodates these types of errors with a few status codes --
 for example, 502 (Bad Gateway) and 504 (Gateway Timeout).  However,
 experience has shown that more information is necessary to aid
 debugging and communicate what's happened to the client.
 Additionally, intermediaries sometimes want to convey additional
 information about their handling of a response, even if they did not
 generate it.
 To enable these uses, Section 2 defines a new HTTP response field to
 allow intermediaries to convey details of their handling of a
 response.  Section 2.1 enumerates the information that can be added
 to the field by intermediaries, which can be extended per
 Section 2.2.  Section 2.3 defines a set of error types for use when a
 proxy encounters an issue when obtaining a response for the request;
 these can likewise be extended per Section 2.4.

1.1. Notational Conventions

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
 "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
 BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
 capitals, as shown here.
 This document uses the following terminology from Section 3 of
 [STRUCTURED-FIELDS] to specify syntax and parsing: List, String,
 Token, Integer, and Byte Sequence.
 Note that in this specification, "proxy" is used to indicate both
 forward and reverse proxies, otherwise known as gateways.  "Next hop"
 indicates the connection in the direction leading to the origin
 server for the request.

2. The Proxy-Status HTTP Field

 The Proxy-Status HTTP response field allows an intermediary to convey
 additional information about its handling of a response and its
 associated request.
 Its value is a List (see Section 3.1 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]).  Each
 member of the List represents an intermediary that has handled the
 response.  The first member represents the intermediary closest to
 the origin server, and the last member represents the intermediary
 closest to the user agent.
 For example:
 Proxy-Status: revproxy1.example.net, ExampleCDN
 indicates that this response was handled first by
 revproxy1.example.net (a reverse proxy adjacent to the origin server)
 and then ExampleCDN.
 Intermediaries determine when it is appropriate to add the Proxy-
 Status field to a response.  Some might decide to append it to all
 responses, whereas others might only do so when specifically
 configured to or when the request contains a header field that
 activates a debugging mode.
 Each member of the List identifies the intermediary that inserted the
 value and MUST have a type of either String or Token.  Depending on
 the deployment, this might be a service name (but not a software or
 hardware product name; e.g., "ExampleCDN" is appropriate, but
 "ExampleProxy" is not because it doesn't identify the deployment), a
 hostname ("proxy-3.example.com"), an IP address, or a generated
 string.
 Parameters of each member (per Section 3.1.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS])
 convey additional information about that intermediary's handling of
 the response and its associated request; see Section 2.1.  While all
 of these parameters are OPTIONAL, intermediaries are encouraged to
 provide as much information as possible (but see Section 4 for
 security considerations in doing so).
 When adding a value to the Proxy-Status field, intermediaries SHOULD
 preserve the existing members of the field to allow debugging of the
 entire chain of intermediaries handling the request unless explicitly
 configured to remove them (e.g., to prevent internal network details
 from leaking; see Section 4).
 Origin servers MUST NOT generate the Proxy-Status field.
 Proxy-Status MAY be sent as an HTTP trailer field.  For example, if
 an intermediary is streaming a response and the inbound connection
 suddenly terminates, Proxy-Status can only be appended to the trailer
 section of the outbound message since the header section has already
 been sent.  However, because it might be silently discarded along the
 path to the user agent (as is the case for all trailer fields; see
 Section 6.5 of [HTTP]), Proxy-Status SHOULD NOT be sent as a trailer
 field unless it is not possible to send it in the header section.
 To allow recipients to reconstruct the relative ordering of Proxy-
 Status members conveyed in trailer fields with those conveyed in
 header fields, an intermediary MUST NOT send Proxy-Status as a
 trailer field unless it has also generated a Proxy-Status header
 field with the same member (although potentially different
 parameters) in that message.
 For example, a proxy identified as 'ThisProxy' that receives a
 response bearing a header field:
 Proxy-Status: SomeOtherProxy
 would add its own entry to the header field:
 Proxy-Status: SomeOtherProxy, ThisProxy
 thus allowing it to append a trailer field:
 Proxy-Status: ThisProxy; error=read_timeout
 which would thereby allow a downstream recipient to understand that
 processing by 'SomeOtherProxy' occurred before 'ThisProxy'.
 A client MAY promote the Proxy-Status trailer field into a header
 field by following these steps:
 1.  For each member trailer_member of the Proxy-Status trailer field
     value:
     1.  Let header_member be the first (leftmost) value of the Proxy-
         Status header field value, comparing the String or Token
         character by character without consideration of parameters.
     2.  If no matching header_member is found, continue processing
         the next trailer_member.
     3.  Replace header_member with trailer_member in its entirety,
         including any parameters.
 2.  Remove the Proxy-Status trailer field if empty.

2.1. Proxy-Status Parameters

 This section lists parameters that can be used on the members of the
 Proxy-Status field.  Unrecognised parameters MUST be ignored.

2.1.1. error

 The error parameter's value is a Token that is a proxy error type.
 When present, it indicates that the intermediary encountered an issue
 when obtaining this response.
 The presence of some proxy error types indicates that the response
 was generated by the intermediary itself, rather than being forwarded
 from the origin server.  This is the case when, for example, the
 origin server can't be contacted, so the proxy has to create its own
 response.
 Other proxy error types can be added to (potentially partial)
 responses that were generated by the origin server or some other
 inbound server.  For example, if the forward connection abruptly
 closes, an intermediary might add Proxy-Status with an appropriate
 error as a trailer field.
 Proxy error types that are registered with a 'Response only generated
 by intermediaries' value of 'true' indicate that they can only occur
 in responses generated by the intermediary.  If the value is 'false',
 the response might be generated by the intermediary or an inbound
 server.
 Section 2.3 lists the proxy error types defined in this document; new
 ones can be defined using the procedure outlined in Section 2.4.
 For example:
 HTTP/1.1 504 Gateway Timeout
 Proxy-Status: ExampleCDN; error=connection_timeout
 indicates that this 504 response was generated by ExampleCDN due to a
 connection timeout when going forward.
 Or:
 HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
 Proxy-Status: r34.example.net; error=http_request_error, ExampleCDN
 indicates that this 429 (Too Many Requests) response was generated by
 r34.example.net, not the CDN or the origin.
 When sending the error parameter, the most specific proxy error type
 SHOULD be sent, provided that it accurately represents the error
 condition.  If an appropriate proxy error type is not defined, there
 are a number of generic error types (e.g., proxy_internal_error,
 http_protocol_error) that can be used.  If they are not suitable,
 consider registering a new proxy error type (see Section 2.4).
 Each proxy error type has a recommended HTTP status code.  When
 generating an HTTP response containing the error, its HTTP status
 code SHOULD be set to the recommended HTTP status code.  However,
 there may be circumstances (e.g., for backwards compatibility with
 previous behaviours, a status code has already been sent) when
 another status code might be used.
 Proxy error types can also define any number of extra parameters for
 use with that type.  Their use, like all parameters, is optional.  As
 a result, if an extra parameter is used with a proxy error type for
 which it is not defined, it will be ignored.

2.1.2. next-hop

 The next-hop parameter's value is a String or Token that identifies
 the intermediary or origin server selected (and used, if contacted)
 to obtain this response.  It might be a hostname, IP address, or
 alias.
 For example:
 Proxy-Status: cdn.example.org; next-hop=backend.example.org:8001
 indicates that cdn.example.org used backend.example.org:8001 as the
 next hop for this request.

2.1.3. next-protocol

 The next-protocol parameter's value indicates the Application-Layer
 Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) protocol identifier [RFC7301] of the
 protocol used by the intermediary to connect to the next hop when
 obtaining this response.
 The value MUST be either a Token or Byte Sequence representing a TLS
 ALPN Protocol ID (see <https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-
 extensiontype-values#alpn-protocol-ids>).  If the protocol identifier
 is able to be expressed as a Token using ASCII encoding, that form
 MUST be used.
 For example:
 Proxy-Status: "proxy.example.org"; next-protocol=h2
 Note that the ALPN identifier is being used here to identify the
 protocol in use; it may or may not have been actually used in the
 protocol negotiation.

2.1.4. received-status

 The received-status parameter's value indicates the HTTP status code
 that the intermediary received from the next-hop server when
 obtaining this response.
 The value MUST be an Integer.
 For example:
 Proxy-Status: ExampleCDN; received-status=200

2.1.5. details

 The details parameter's value is a String containing additional
 information not captured anywhere else.  This can include
 implementation-specific or deployment-specific information.
 For example:
 Proxy-Status: proxy.example.net; error="http_protocol_error";
               details="Malformed response header: space before colon"

2.2. Defining New Proxy-Status Parameters

 New Proxy-Status parameters can be defined by registering them in the
 "HTTP Proxy-Status Parameters" registry.
 Registration requests are reviewed and approved by Expert Review, per
 [RFC8126], Section 4.5.  A specification document is appreciated but
 not required.
 The expert(s) should consider the following factors when evaluating
 requests:
  • Community feedback
  • If the value is sufficiently well defined
  • Generic parameters are preferred over vendor-specific,

application-specific, or deployment-specific values. If a generic

    value cannot be agreed upon in the community, the parameter's name
    should be correspondingly specific (e.g., with a prefix that
    identifies the vendor, application, or deployment).
  • Parameter names should not conflict with registered extra

parameters in the "HTTP Proxy Error Types" registry.

 Registration requests should use the following template:
 Name:  [a name for the Proxy-Status parameter that matches key]
 Description:  [a description of the parameter semantics and value]
 Reference:  [to a specification defining this parameter; optional]
 See the registry at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-
 status> for details on where to send registration requests.

2.3. Proxy Error Types

 This section lists the proxy error types defined by this document.
 See Section 2.4 for information about defining new proxy error types.
 Note that implementations might not produce all proxy error types.
 The set of types below is designed to map to existing states in
 implementations and therefore may not be applicable to some.

2.3.1. DNS Timeout

 Name:  dns_timeout
 Description:  The intermediary encountered a timeout when trying to
    find an IP address for the next-hop hostname.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  504
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.2. DNS Error

 Name:  dns_error
 Description:  The intermediary encountered a DNS error when trying to
    find an IP address for the next-hop hostname.
 Extra Parameters:
    rcode:  A String conveying the DNS RCODE that indicates the error
       type.  See [RFC8499], Section 3.
    info-code:  An Integer conveying the Extended DNS Error Code INFO-
       CODE.  See [RFC8914].
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.3. Destination Not Found

 Name:  destination_not_found
 Description:  The intermediary cannot determine the appropriate next
    hop to use for this request; for example, it may not be
    configured.  Note that this error is specific to gateways, which
    typically require specific configuration to identify the "backend"
    server; forward proxies use in-band information to identify the
    origin server.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  500
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.4. Destination Unavailable

 Name:  destination_unavailable
 Description:  The intermediary considers the next hop to be
    unavailable; e.g., recent attempts to communicate with it may have
    failed, or a health check may indicate that it is down.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  503
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.5. Destination IP Prohibited

 Name:  destination_ip_prohibited
 Description:  The intermediary is configured to prohibit connections
    to the next-hop IP address.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.6. Destination IP Unroutable

 Name:  destination_ip_unroutable
 Description:  The intermediary cannot find a route to the next-hop IP
    address.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.7. Connection Refused

 Name:  connection_refused
 Description:  The intermediary's connection to the next hop was
    refused.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.8. Connection Terminated

 Name:  connection_terminated
 Description:  The intermediary's connection to the next hop was
    closed before a complete response was received.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.9. Connection Timeout

 Name:  connection_timeout
 Description:  The intermediary's attempt to open a connection to the
    next hop timed out.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  504
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.10. Connection Read Timeout

 Name:  connection_read_timeout
 Description:  The intermediary was expecting data on a connection
    (e.g., part of a response) but did not receive any new data in a
    configured time limit.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  504
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.11. Connection Write Timeout

 Name:  connection_write_timeout
 Description:  The intermediary was attempting to write data to a
    connection but was not able to (e.g., because its buffers were
    full).
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  504
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.12. Connection Limit Reached

 Name:  connection_limit_reached
 Description:  The intermediary is configured to limit the number of
    connections it has to the next hop, and that limit has been
    exceeded.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  503
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.13. TLS Protocol Error

 Name:  tls_protocol_error
 Description:  The intermediary encountered a TLS error when
    communicating with the next hop, either during the handshake or
    afterwards.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209
 Notes:  Not appropriate when a TLS alert is received; see
    tls_alert_received.

2.3.14. TLS Certificate Error

 Name:  tls_certificate_error
 Description:  The intermediary encountered an error when verifying
    the certificate presented by the next hop.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.15. TLS Alert Received

 Name:  tls_alert_received
 Description:  The intermediary received a TLS alert from the next
    hop.
 Extra Parameters:
    alert-id:  An Integer containing the applicable value from the
       "TLS Alerts" registry.  See [TLS].
    alert-message:  A Token or String containing the applicable
       description string from the "TLS Alerts" registry.  See [TLS].
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.16. HTTP Request Error

 Name:  http_request_error
 Description:  The intermediary is generating a client (4xx) response
    on the origin's behalf.  Applicable status codes include (but are
    not limited to) 400, 403, 405, 406, 408, 411, 413, 414, 415, 416,
    417, and 429.
 Extra Parameters:
    status-code:  An Integer containing the generated status code.
    status-phrase:  A String containing the generated status phrase.
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  The applicable 4xx status code
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209
 Notes:  This type helps distinguish between responses generated by
    intermediaries from those generated by the origin.

2.3.17. HTTP Request Denied

 Name:  http_request_denied
 Description:  The intermediary rejected the HTTP request based on its
    configuration and/or policy settings.  The request wasn't
    forwarded to the next hop.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  403
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.18. HTTP Incomplete Response

 Name:  http_response_incomplete
 Description:  The intermediary received an incomplete response to the
    request from the next hop.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.19. HTTP Response Header Section Too Large

 Name:  http_response_header_section_size
 Description:  The intermediary received a response to the request
    whose header section was considered too large.
 Extra Parameters:
    header-section-size:  An Integer indicating how large the received
       headers were.  Note that they might not be complete; i.e., the
       intermediary may have discarded or refused additional data.
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.20. HTTP Response Header Field Line Too Large

 Name:  http_response_header_size
 Description:  The intermediary received a response to the request
    containing an individual header field line that was considered too
    large.
 Extra Parameters:
    header-name:  A String indicating the name of the header field
       that triggered the error.
    header-size:  An Integer indicating the size of the header field
       that triggered the error.
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.21. HTTP Response Body Too Large

 Name:  http_response_body_size
 Description:  The intermediary received a response to the request
    whose body was considered too large.
 Extra Parameters:
    body-size:  An Integer indicating how large the received body was.
       Note that it may not have been complete; i.e., the intermediary
       may have discarded or refused additional data.
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.22. HTTP Response Trailer Section Too Large

 Name:  http_response_trailer_section_size
 Description:  The intermediary received a response to the request
    whose trailer section was considered too large.
 Extra Parameters:
    trailer-section-size:  An Integer indicating how large the
       received trailers were.  Note that they might not be complete;
       i.e., the intermediary may have discarded or refused additional
       data.
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.23. HTTP Response Trailer Field Line Too Large

 Name:  http_response_trailer_size
 Description:  The intermediary received a response to the request
    containing an individual trailer field line that was considered
    too large.
 Extra Parameters:
    trailer-name:  A String indicating the name of the trailer field
       that triggered the error.
    trailer-size:  An Integer indicating the size of the trailer field
       that triggered the error.
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.24. HTTP Response Transfer-Coding Error

 Name:  http_response_transfer_coding
 Description:  The intermediary encountered an error decoding the
    transfer coding of the response.
 Extra Parameters:
    coding:  A Token containing the specific coding (from the "HTTP
       Transfer Coding Registry") that caused the error.
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.25. HTTP Response Content-Coding Error

 Name:  http_response_content_coding
 Description:  The intermediary encountered an error decoding the
    content coding of the response.
 Extra Parameters:
    coding:  A Token containing the specific coding (from the "HTTP
       Content Coding Registry") that caused the error.
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.26. HTTP Response Timeout

 Name:  http_response_timeout
 Description:  The intermediary reached a configured time limit
    waiting for the complete response.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  504
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.27. HTTP Upgrade Failed

 Name:  http_upgrade_failed
 Description:  The process of negotiating an upgrade of the HTTP
    version between the intermediary and the next hop failed.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.28. HTTP Protocol Error

 Name:  http_protocol_error
 Description:  The intermediary encountered an HTTP protocol error
    when communicating with the next hop.  This error should only be
    used when a more specific one is not defined.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  false
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.29. Proxy Internal Response

 Name:  proxy_internal_response
 Description:  The intermediary generated the response itself without
    attempting to connect to the next hop.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  The most appropriate status code for
    the response
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.30. Proxy Internal Error

 Name:  proxy_internal_error
 Description:  The intermediary encountered an internal error
    unrelated to the origin.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  500
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.31. Proxy Configuration Error

 Name:  proxy_configuration_error
 Description:  The intermediary encountered an error regarding its
    configuration.
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  500
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.3.32. Proxy Loop Detected

 Name:  proxy_loop_detected
 Description:  The intermediary tried to forward the request to
    itself, or a loop has been detected using different means (e.g.,
    [RFC8586]).
 Extra Parameters:  None
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  502
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  true
 Reference:  RFC 9209

2.4. Defining New Proxy Error Types

 New proxy error types can be defined by registering them in the "HTTP
 Proxy Error Types" registry.
 Registration requests are reviewed and approved by Expert Review, per
 [RFC8126], Section 4.5.  A specification document is appreciated but
 not required.
 The expert(s) should consider the following factors when evaluating
 requests:
  • Community feedback
  • If the value is sufficiently well-defined
  • Generic types are preferred over vendor-specific, application-

specific, or deployment-specific values. If a generic value

    cannot be agreed upon in the community, the type's name should be
    correspondingly specific (e.g., with a prefix that identifies the
    vendor, application, or deployment).
  • Extra parameters should not conflict with registered Proxy-Status

parameters.

 Registration requests should use the following template:
 Name:  [a name for the proxy error type that is of type Token]
 Description:  [a description of the conditions that generate the
    proxy error type]
 Extra Parameters:  [zero or more optional parameters, along with
    their allowable Structured Type(s)]
 Recommended HTTP Status Code:  [the appropriate HTTP status code for
    this entry]
 Response Only Generated by Intermediaries:  ['true' or 'false']
 Reference:  [to a specification defining this error type; optional]
 Notes:  [optional]
 If the proxy error type might occur in responses that are not
 generated by the intermediary -- for example, when an error is
 detected as the response is streamed from a forward connection,
 causing a Proxy-Status trailer field to be appended -- the 'Response
 only generated by intermediaries' should be 'false'.  If the proxy
 error type only occurs in responses that are generated by the
 intermediary, it should be 'true'.
 See the registry at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-
 status> for details on where to send registration requests.

3. IANA Considerations

 IANA has created the "HTTP Proxy-Status Parameters" registry and the
 "HTTP Proxy Error Types" registry at
 <https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-status> and has
 populated them with the types defined in Sections 2.1 and 2.3
 respectively; see Sections 2.2 and 2.4 for their associated
 procedures.
 Additionally, the following entry has been added to the "Hypertext
 Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Field Name Registry":
 Field name:  Proxy-Status
 Status:  permanent
 Specification document(s):  RFC 9209
 Comments:

4. Security Considerations

 One of the primary security concerns when using Proxy-Status is
 leaking information that might aid an attacker.  For example,
 information about the intermediary's configuration and backend
 topology can be exposed, allowing attackers to directly target
 backend services that are not prepared for high traffic volume or
 malformed inputs.  Some information might only be suitable to reveal
 to authorized parties.
 As a result, care needs to be taken when deciding to generate a
 Proxy-Status field and what information to include in it.  Note that
 intermediaries are not required to generate a Proxy-Status field in
 any response and can conditionally generate them based upon request
 attributes (e.g., authentication tokens, IP address).
 Likewise, generation of all parameters is optional, as is the
 generation of the field itself.  Also, the field's content is not
 verified; an intermediary can claim certain actions (e.g., sending a
 request over an encrypted channel) but fail to actually do that.

5. References

5.1. Normative References

 [HTTP]     Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke,
            Ed., "HTTP Semantics", STD 97, RFC 9110,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC9110, June 2022,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9110>.
 [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
            Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
 [RFC7301]  Friedl, S., Popov, A., Langley, A., and E. Stephan,
            "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application-Layer Protocol
            Negotiation Extension", RFC 7301, DOI 10.17487/RFC7301,
            July 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7301>.
 [RFC8126]  Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
            Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
            RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
 [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
            2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
            May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
 [RFC8499]  Hoffman, P., Sullivan, A., and K. Fujiwara, "DNS
            Terminology", BCP 219, RFC 8499, DOI 10.17487/RFC8499,
            January 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8499>.
 [RFC8914]  Kumari, W., Hunt, E., Arends, R., Hardaker, W., and D.
            Lawrence, "Extended DNS Errors", RFC 8914,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC8914, October 2020,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8914>.
 [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]
            Nottingham, M. and P-H. Kamp, "Structured Field Values for
            HTTP", RFC 8941, DOI 10.17487/RFC8941, March 2021,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8941>.
 [TLS]      Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
            Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.

5.2. Informative References

 [RFC8586]  Ludin, S., Nottingham, M., and N. Sullivan, "Loop
            Detection in Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)", RFC 8586,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC8586, April 2019,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8586>.

Authors' Addresses

 Mark Nottingham
 Fastly
 Prahran
 Australia
 Email: mnot@mnot.net
 URI:   https://www.mnot.net/
 Piotr Sikora
 Google
 Email: piotrsikora@google.com
/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc9209.txt · Last modified: 2022/06/08 22:52 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki