GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc7894

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Pritikin Request for Comments: 7894 Cisco Systems, Inc. Category: Standards Track C. Wallace ISSN: 2070-1721 Red Hound Software, Inc.

                                                             June 2016
             Alternative Challenge Password Attributes
                for Enrollment over Secure Transport

Abstract

 This document defines a set of new Certificate Signing Request
 attributes for use with the Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST)
 protocol.  These attributes provide disambiguation of the existing
 overloaded uses for the challengePassword attribute defined in "PKCS
 #9: Selected Object Classes and Attribute Types Version 2.0" (RFC
 2985).  Uses include the original certificate revocation password,
 common authentication password uses, and EST-defined linking of
 transport security identity.

Status of This Memo

 This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7894.

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

 1. Introduction ....................................................3
 2. Terminology .....................................................4
 3. Alternative Challenge Password Attributes .......................4
    3.1. OTP Challenge Attribute ....................................4
    3.2. Revocation Challenge Attribute .............................5
    3.3. EST Identity Linking Attribute .............................5
 4. Indicating Support for the Alternative Challenge Attributes .....6
 5. Security Considerations .........................................6
 6. IANA Considerations .............................................7
 7. References ......................................................7
    7.1. Normative References .......................................7
    7.2. Informative References .....................................8
 Appendix A.  ASN.1 Module ..........................................9
 Acknowledgements ..................................................10
 Authors' Addresses ................................................10

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

1. Introduction

 "PKCS #9: Selected Object Classes and Attribute Types Version 2.0"
 [RFC2985] defined a challengePassword attribute that has been
 overloaded by modern protocol usage with the appropriate
 interpretation being provided by context rather than OID definition.
 PKCS #9 defines the challengePassword attribute as "a password by
 which an entity may request certificate revocation".  The parsing and
 embedding of this attribute within Certificate Signing Requests is
 well supported by common PKI toolsets, but many workflows leverage
 this supported field as a one-time password for authentication.  For
 example, this is codified in many Simple Certificate Enrollment
 Protocol (SCEP) implementations as indicated by [SCEP].  Continuing
 this trend, Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST) [RFC7030] defines
 an additional semantic for the challengePassword attribute in
 Section 3.5, in order to provide a linking of the Certificate Signing
 Request (CSR) to the secure transport.
 Where the context of the protocol operation fully defined the proper
 semantic, and when only one use was required at a time, the
 overloading of this field did not cause difficulties.  Implementation
 experience with EST has shown this to be a limitation though.  There
 are plausible use cases where it is valuable to use either of the
 existing methods separately or in concert.  For example, an EST
 server might require the client to authenticate itself using the
 existing client X.509 certificate as well as the user's username and
 password, and to include a one-time password within the CSR, all
 while maintaining identity linking to bind the CSR to the secure
 transport.  The overloading of a single attribute type should not be
 the limiting factor for administrators attempting to meet their
 security requirements.
 This document defines the otpChallenge attribute for use when a one-
 time password (OTP) value within the CSR is a requirement.  The
 revocationChallenge attribute is defined to allow disambiguated usage
 of the original challenge password attribute semantics for
 certificate revocation.  The estIdentityLinking attribute is defined
 to reference existing EST challenge password semantics with no
 potential for confusion with legacy challenge password practices.
 The attributes defined in this specification supplement existing EST
 mechanisms and are not intended to displace current usage of any
 existing EST authentication mechanisms.  Conveying the authentication
 value itself as an attribute may be preferable to using an HTTP or
 Transport Layer Security (TLS) password or other TLS authentication
 mechanism in environments where the certificate request processing
 component is removed from the HTTP/TLS termination point, for
 example, when a web application firewall is used.

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

2. Terminology

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3. Alternative Challenge Password Attributes

 The following sections describe three alternative challenge password
 attributes for use with EST [RFC7030].  Appendix A provides an ASN.1
 module containing the new definitions.
 Each attribute described below is defined as a DirectoryString with a
 maximum length of 255, which features several possible encoding
 options.  Attribute values generated in accordance this document
 SHOULD use the PrintableString encoding whenever possible.  If
 internationalization issues make this impossible, the UTF8String
 alternative SHOULD be used.  Attribute processing systems MUST be
 able to recognize and process the PrintableString and UTF8String
 string types in DirectoryString values.  Support for other string
 types is OPTIONAL.

3.1. OTP Challenge Attribute

 The otpChallenge attribute is defined as a DirectoryString with a
 maximum length of 255.  This is consistent with the challengePassword
 attribute as originally defined in PKCS #9 [RFC2985].  The
 otpChallenge attribute is identified by the id-aa-otpChallenge object
 identifier.  This facilitates reuse of the existing challengePassword
 code by associating the new object identifiers with the existing
 parsing and generation code.  This attribute provides a means of
 conveying a one-time password value as part of a CSR request.
 Generation, verification, storage, etc., of the value is not
 addressed by this specification.  [RFC4226] and [RFC6238] define one-
 time password mechanisms that MAY be used with this attribute.
    ub-aa-otpChallenge INTEGER ::= 255
    id-aa-otpChallenge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
        id-smime 56
    }
    otpChallenge ATTRIBUTE ::= {
        WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString {ub-aa-otpChallenge}
        EQUALITY MATCHING RULE caseExactMatch
        SINGLE VALUE TRUE
        ID id-aa-otpChallenge
    }

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

3.2. Revocation Challenge Attribute

 The original PKCS #9 challengePassword field has been overloaded, and
 the common use is unclear.  The revocationChallenge attribute defined
 here provides an unambiguous method of indicating the original PKCS
 #9 intent for this attribute type.  The revocationChallenge attribute
 is identified by the id-aa-revocationChallenge object identifier.
 [RFC2985] discusses the original semantics for the PKCS #9 challenge
 password attribute.
    ub-aa-revocationChallenge INTEGER ::= 255
    id-aa-revocationChallenge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
        id-smime 57
    }
    revocationChallenge ATTRIBUTE ::= {
        WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString {ub-aa-revocationChallenge}
        EQUALITY MATCHING RULE caseExactMatch
        SINGLE VALUE TRUE
        ID id-aa-revocationChallenge
    }

3.3. EST Identity Linking Attribute

 EST defines a mechanism for associating identity information from an
 authenticated TLS session with proof-of-possession information in a
 certificate request.  The mechanism was labeled using the pkcs-9-at-
 challengePassword identifier from [RFC2985].  To avoid any confusion
 with the semantics described in [RFC2985] or any other specifications
 that similarly defined use of the PKCS #9 challenge password
 attribute for their own purposes, a new object identifier is defined
 here and associated with the semantics described in Section 3.5 of
 [RFC7030].
    ub-aa-est-identity-linking INTEGER ::= 255
    id-aa-estIdentityLinking OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
        id-smime 58
    }
    estIdentityLinking ATTRIBUTE ::= {
        WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString {ub-aa-est-identity-linking}
        EQUALITY MATCHING RULE caseExactMatch
        SINGLE VALUE TRUE
        ID id-aa-estIdentityLinking
    }

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

4. Indicating Support for the Alternative Challenge Attributes

 The EST server MUST indicate these attributes, as the particular use
 case requires, in every CSR Attributes Response.  An EST server MAY
 send both the estIdentityLinking attribute and the challengePassword
 attribute [RFC7030] in a CSR Attributes Response to ensure support
 for legacy clients.
 The client MUST include every indicated attribute for which it has
 values in the subsequent CSR.  If a client sees an estIdentityLinking
 attribute in a CSR Attributes Response, it SHOULD prefer that and not
 include a challengePassword attribute [RFC7030] in the resulting CSR.
 EST clients that include an unsolicited estIdentityLinking attribute
 MAY also include the challengePassword attribute [RFC7030] to ensure
 support for legacy servers.
 EST servers MUST evaluate each challenge attribute independently.
 All challenge attributes included by an EST client MUST be
 successfully processed by an EST server for a request to be
 considered valid.  The EST server MAY ignore challenge attributes
 according to local policy, for example, if the EST client is an
 authenticated Registration Authority, the EST server may ignore the
 estIdentityLinking attribute within a CSR (see Section 3.7 of
 [RFC7030]).  The EST server MAY refuse enrollment requests that are
 not encoded according to the policy of the Certification Authority
 (CA).

5. Security Considerations

 In addition to the security considerations expressed in the EST
 specification [RFC7030], additional security considerations may be
 associated with the mechanism used to generate and verify the
 otpChallenge value.  Where a one-time password is used, the security
 considerations expressed in "HOTP: An HMAC-Based One-Time Password
 Algorithm" [RFC4226] or "TOTP: Time-Based One-Time Password
 Algorithm" [RFC6238] may be relevant.  Similarly, the security
 considerations from [RFC2985] that apply to the challenge attribute
 are relevant as well.

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

6. IANA Considerations

 Section 3 defines three attributes that have been assigned object
 identifiers in the "SMI Security for S/MIME Attributes
 (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.2)" registry [RFC7107]:
      Value     Description                        Reference
      --------  ---------------------------------  ----------
      56        id-aa-otpChallenge                 RFC 7894
      57        id-aa-revocationChallenge          RFC 7894
      58        id-aa-estIdentityLinking           RFC 7894
 Appendix A contains an ASN.1 module.  A module identifier has been
 assigned in the "SMI Security for PKIX Module Identifier" registry
 [RFC7299].
      Value     Description                        Reference
      --------  ---------------------------------  ----------
      87        id-mod-EST-Alt-Challenge           RFC 7894

7. References

7.1. Normative References

 [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
            Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
 [RFC2985]  Nystrom, M. and B. Kaliski, "PKCS #9: Selected Object
            Classes and Attribute Types Version 2.0", RFC 2985,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC2985, November 2000,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2985>.
 [RFC5272]  Schaad, J. and M. Myers, "Certificate Management over CMS
            (CMC)", RFC 5272, DOI 10.17487/RFC5272, June 2008,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5272>.
 [RFC5280]  Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
            Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
            Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
            (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.
 [RFC5912]  Hoffman, P. and J. Schaad, "New ASN.1 Modules for the
            Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)", RFC 5912,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC5912, June 2010,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5912>.

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

 [RFC7030]  Pritikin, M., Ed., Yee, P., Ed., and D. Harkins, Ed.,
            "Enrollment over Secure Transport", RFC 7030,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC7030, October 2013,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7030>.

7.2. Informative References

 [RFC4226]  M'Raihi, D., Bellare, M., Hoornaert, F., Naccache, D., and
            O. Ranen, "HOTP: An HMAC-Based One-Time Password
            Algorithm", RFC 4226, DOI 10.17487/RFC4226, December 2005,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4226>.
 [RFC6238]  M'Raihi, D., Machani, S., Pei, M., and J. Rydell, "TOTP:
            Time-Based One-Time Password Algorithm", RFC 6238,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC6238, May 2011,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6238>.
 [RFC7107]  Housley, R., "Object Identifier Registry for the S/MIME
            Mail Security Working Group", RFC 7107,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC7107, January 2014,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7107>.
 [RFC7299]  Housley, R., "Object Identifier Registry for the PKIX
            Working Group", RFC 7299, DOI 10.17487/RFC7299, July 2014,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7299>.
 [SCEP]     Gutmann, P. and M. Pritikin, "Simple Certificate Enrolment
            Protocol", Work in Progress, draft-gutmann-scep-02, March
            2016.

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

Appendix A. ASN.1 Module

 The following ASN.1 module includes the definitions to support usage
 of the attributes defined in this specification.  Modules from
 [RFC5912] are imported (the original Standards Track source for the
 imported structures is [RFC5280] and [RFC5272]).
 Mod-EST-Alt-Challenge {
    iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5)
       mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) 87
 }
 DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
 BEGIN
 IMPORTS
 DirectoryString{}
 FROM PKIX1Explicit-2009 {
    iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5)
    mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) id-mod-pkix1-explicit-02(51)
 }
 ATTRIBUTE
 FROM PKIX-CommonTypes-2009 {
    iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5)
    mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) id-mod-pkixCommon-02(57)
 };
 ub-aa-otpChallenge INTEGER ::= 255
 id-aa-otpChallenge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
    iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9)
    smime(16) aa(2) 56
 }
 otpChallenge ATTRIBUTE ::= {
    TYPE DirectoryString {ub-aa-otpChallenge}
    COUNTS MIN 1 MAX 1
    IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-otpChallenge
 }
 ub-aa-revocationChallenge INTEGER ::= 255
 id-aa-revocationChallenge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
    iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9)
    smime(16) aa(2) 57
 }
 revocationChallenge ATTRIBUTE ::= {
    TYPE DirectoryString {ub-aa-revocationChallenge}
    COUNTS MIN 1 MAX 1
    IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-revocationChallenge
 }

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 7894 EST Alternative Challenge Password Attributes June 2016

 ub-aa-est-identity-linking INTEGER ::= 255
 id-aa-estIdentityLinking OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
    iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9)
    smime(16) aa(2) 58
 }
 estIdentityLinking ATTRIBUTE ::= {
    TYPE DirectoryString {ub-aa-est-identity-linking}
    COUNTS MIN 1 MAX 1
    IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-estIdentityLinking
 }
 END

Acknowledgements

 Thanks to Jim Schaad, Dan Harkins, Phil Scheffler, Geoff Beier, Mike
 Jenkins, and Deb Cooley for their feedback.

Authors' Addresses

 Max Pritikin
 Cisco Systems, Inc.
 510 McCarthy Drive
 Milpitas, CA  95035
 United States
 Email: pritikin@cisco.com
 Carl Wallace
 Red Hound Software, Inc.
 Email: carl@redhoundsoftware.com

Pritikin & Wallace Standards Track [Page 10]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc7894.txt · Last modified: 2016/06/09 01:24 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki