GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc7883

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) L. Ginsberg Request for Comments: 7883 Cisco Systems Category: Standards Track N. Akiya ISSN: 2070-1721 Big Switch Networks

                                                               M. Chen
                                                                Huawei
                                                             July 2016
  Advertising Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD)
                      Discriminators in IS-IS

Abstract

 This document defines a means of advertising one or more Seamless
 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Discriminators using the
 IS-IS Router CAPABILITY TLV.

Status of This Memo

 This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7883.

Ginsberg, et al. Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 7883 Advertising S-BFD Discriminators in IS-IS July 2016

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.
 This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
 Contributions published or made publicly available before November
 10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
 material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
 modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
 Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
 the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
 outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
 not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
 it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
 than English.

Table of Contents

 1. Introduction ....................................................3
 2. Encoding Format .................................................3
 3. IANA Considerations .............................................4
 4. Security Considerations .........................................4
 5. Normative References ............................................4
 Acknowledgements ...................................................5
 Authors' Addresses .................................................5

Ginsberg, et al. Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 7883 Advertising S-BFD Discriminators in IS-IS July 2016

1. Introduction

 [RFC7880] defines a simplified mechanism for using Bidirectional
 Forwarding Detection (BFD) [RFC5880].  This mechanism depends on
 network nodes knowing the BFD Discriminators that each node in the
 network has reserved for this purpose.  The use of the Intermediate
 System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) [IS-IS] protocol is one
 possible means of advertising these discriminators.
 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

2. Encoding Format

 The IS-IS Router CAPABILITY TLV as defined in [RFC4971] will be used
 to advertise Seamless BFD (S-BFD) Discriminators.  A new sub-TLV is
 defined as described below.  S-BFD Discriminators sub-TLVs are
 formatted as specified in [RFC5305].
                                                No. of octets
               +-----------------------------+
               | Type (20)                   |     1
               +-----------------------------+
               | Length (multiple of 4)      |     1
               +-----------------------------+
               | Discriminator Value(s)      |     4/Discriminator
               :                             :
               +-----------------------------+
 The inclusion of an S-BFD Discriminators sub-TLV in a Router
 CAPABILITY TLV is optional.  Multiple S-BFD Discriminators sub-TLVs
 MAY be advertised by an IS.  How a given discriminator is mapped to a
 specific use case when multiple S-BFD Discriminators are advertised
 is out of scope for this document.
 S-BFD Discriminator advertisements MAY be flooded within an area or
 throughout the domain, using the procedures specified in [RFC4971].
 The appropriate flooding scope depends on the intended use of S-BFD.
 If S-BFD usage will be exclusively within a Level-1 area, then area
 scope is appropriate.  If S-BFD usage will span different Level-1
 areas, then domain scope is appropriate.

Ginsberg, et al. Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 7883 Advertising S-BFD Discriminators in IS-IS July 2016

3. IANA Considerations

 IANA has added a new sub-TLV in the "Sub-TLVs for TLV 242" registry.
 The registration is as follows:
    Value  Description
    -----  --------------------
    20     S-BFD Discriminators

4. Security Considerations

 Security concerns for IS-IS are addressed in [IS-IS], [RFC5304], and
 [RFC5310].  The new S-BFD Discriminators sub-TLV does not introduce
 any new security risks for IS-IS.
 Advertising the S-BFD Discriminators makes it possible for attackers
 to initiate S-BFD sessions using the advertised information.  The
 vulnerabilities this poses and how to mitigate them are discussed in
 [RFC7880].

5. Normative References

 [IS-IS]    International Organization for Standardization,
            "Intermediate System to Intermediate System intra-domain
            routeing information exchange protocol for use in
            conjunction with the protocol for providing the
            connectionless-mode network service (ISO 8473)",
            ISO Standard 10589, 2002.
 [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
            Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
 [RFC4971]  Vasseur, JP., Ed., Shen, N., Ed., and R. Aggarwal, Ed.,
            "Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS)
            Extensions for Advertising Router Information", RFC 4971,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC4971, July 2007,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4971>.
 [RFC5304]  Li, T. and R. Atkinson, "IS-IS Cryptographic
            Authentication", RFC 5304, DOI 10.17487/RFC5304,
            October 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5304>.
 [RFC5305]  Li, T. and H. Smit, "IS-IS Extensions for Traffic
            Engineering", RFC 5305, DOI 10.17487/RFC5305,
            October 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5305>.

Ginsberg, et al. Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 7883 Advertising S-BFD Discriminators in IS-IS July 2016

 [RFC5310]  Bhatia, M., Manral, V., Li, T., Atkinson, R., White, R.,
            and M. Fanto, "IS-IS Generic Cryptographic
            Authentication", RFC 5310, DOI 10.17487/RFC5310,
            February 2009, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5310>.
 [RFC5880]  Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
            (BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>.
 [RFC7880]  Pignataro, C., Ward, D., Akiya, N., Bhatia, M., and S.
            Pallagatti, "Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
            (S-BFD)", RFC 7880, DOI 10.17487/RFC7880, July 2016,
            <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7880>.

Acknowledgements

 The authors wish to thank Sam Aldrin, Manav Bhatia, and Carlos
 Pignataro for input essential to defining the needed functionality.

Authors' Addresses

 Les Ginsberg
 Cisco Systems
 510 McCarthy Blvd.
 Milpitas, CA  95035
 United States of America
 Email: ginsberg@cisco.com
 Nobo Akiya
 Big Switch Networks
 Email: nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com
 Mach(Guoyi) Chen
 Huawei
 Email: mach.chen@huawei.com

Ginsberg, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc7883.txt · Last modified: 2016/07/13 00:45 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki