GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc7134

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Rosen Request for Comments: 7134 NeuStar Updates: 4412 March 2014 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721

The Management Policy of the Resource Priority Header (RPH) Registry
                      Changed to "IETF Review"

Abstract

 RFC 4412 defines the "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-
 Priority Priority-values" registries.  The management policy of these
 registries is "Standards Action".  This document normatively updates
 RFC 4412 to change the management policy of these registries to "IETF
 Review".

Status of This Memo

 This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7134.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.

Rosen Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 7134 RPH Registry Management March 2014

1. Introduction

 [RFC4412] defines the "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-
 Priority Priority-values" registries.  The management policy of these
 registries is "Standards Action" [RFC5226].  Experience suggests that
 a document that only defines a new namespace with its priorities, and
 does not create new protocol semantics, should not be a Standards-
 Track document.  Therefore, this document updates [RFC4412] to change
 the management policy of the registries to "IETF Review".

2. Security Considerations

 This document does not introduce any security considerations beyond
 those discussed in [RFC4412].

3. IANA Considerations

 IANA has changed the management policy of the "Resource-Priority
 Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority Priority-values" registries to
 "IETF Review" [RFC5226].

4. Normative References

 [RFC4412]  Schulzrinne, H. and J. Polk, "Communications Resource
            Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC
            4412, February 2006.
 [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
            IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
            May 2008.

Author's Address

 Brian Rosen
 NeuStar
 470 Conrad Dr.
 Mars, PA  16046
 US
 Phone: +1 724 382 1051
 EMail: br@brianrosen.net

Rosen Standards Track [Page 2]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc7134.txt · Last modified: 2014/03/04 11:09 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki