GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc6814

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) C. Pignataro Request for Comments: 6814 Cisco Systems Obsoletes: 1385, 1393, 1475, 1770 F. Gont Category: Standards Track UTN-FRH / SI6 Networks ISSN: 2070-1721 November 2012

               Formally Deprecating Some IPv4 Options

Abstract

 A number of IPv4 options have become obsolete in practice, but have
 never been formally deprecated.  This document deprecates such IPv4
 options, thus cleaning up the corresponding IANA registry.
 Additionally, it obsoletes RFCs 1385, 1393, 1475, and 1770, and
 requests that the RFC Editor change their status to Historic.

Status of This Memo

 This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6814.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.

Pignataro & Gont Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 6814 Deprecating Some IPv4 Options November 2012

Table of Contents

 1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 2.  Discussion of Deprecated Options  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
   2.1.  Stream ID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
   2.2.  Extended Internet Protocol  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.3.  Traceroute  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.4.  ENCODE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.5.  VISA  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.6.  Address Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.7.  Selective Directed Broadcast  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.8.  Dynamic Packet State  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.9.  Upstream Multicast Pkt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 3.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 4.  Changing the Status of the Corresponding RFCs to Historic . . . 4
 5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 6.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1. Introduction

 The Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) [RFC791] provides for
 expansion of the protocol by supporting a number of "options" in the
 variable-length IPv4 header.  IPv4 options are identified by an
 option "type" value, whose registration is managed by IANA [IANA-IP].
 A number of IPv4 options have become obsolete in practice, but have
 never been formally deprecated.  This document deprecates such IPv4
 options, thus cleaning up the corresponding IANA registry.
 This document also obsoletes [RFC1385], [RFC1393], [RFC1475], and
 [RFC1770], and requests that the RFC Editor change their status to
 Historic.

2. Discussion of Deprecated Options

 The following subsections discuss the options being deprecated.  No
 other reference information has been found.

2.1. Stream ID

 The Stream ID option is obsolete.  It is specified in RFC 791
 [RFC791], and is deprecated in Section 3.2.1.8 of RFC 1122 [RFC1122]
 and Section 4.2.2.1 of RFC 1812 [RFC1812].

Pignataro & Gont Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 6814 Deprecating Some IPv4 Options November 2012

2.2. Extended Internet Protocol

 The Extended Internet Protocol option is defined in [RFC1385] and is
 superseded by [RFC2460].

2.3. Traceroute

 The Traceroute option is defined in [RFC1393].  The Traceroute option
 is defined as Experimental; it was never widely deployed on the
 public Internet.

2.4. ENCODE

 This option was used for experimentation around IP-layer encryption.
 No products are known to ever have shipped with support for this
 option.

2.5. VISA

 This option was part of an experiment [VISA87] [VISA89] at USC and
 was never widely deployed.

2.6. Address Extension

 The Address Extension option is defined in an Experimental RFC
 [RFC1475] and marked as IPv7.  IPv7 was never widely deployed.

2.7. Selective Directed Broadcast

 The Selective Directed Broadcast option was originally defined in
 [RFC1770].  This option was never widely deployed and the approach
 was abandoned.

2.8. Dynamic Packet State

 The Dynamic Packet State option was specified in [DIFFSERV-DPS].  The
 aforementioned document was meant to be published as Experimental,
 but it never became an RFC.  The IP option was never widely deployed.

2.9. Upstream Multicast Pkt.

 This option was originally specified in [BIDIR-PIM].  Its use was
 deprecated by [RFC5015], which employs a control-plane mechanism to
 solve the problem of doing upstream forwarding of multicast packets
 on a multi-access LAN.

Pignataro & Gont Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 6814 Deprecating Some IPv4 Options November 2012

3. IANA Considerations

 The "IP OPTION NUMBERS" registry [IANA-IP] contains the list of
 currently assigned IP option numbers.  This registry also denotes a
 deprecated IP Option Number by marking it with a footnote.
 This document formally deprecates the following options.  IANA has
 marked them as such in the corresponding registry [IANA-IP].
 Copy Class Number Value Name                                Reference
 ---- ----- ------ ----- -------------------------------  ------------
    1     0      8   136 SID    - Stream ID               [RFC791,JBP]
    1     0     14   142 VISA   - Experimental Access Control [Estrin]
    0     0     15    15 ENCODE - ???                       [VerSteeg]
    1     0     17   145 EIP    - Extended Internet Protocol [RFC1385]
    0     2     18    82 TR     - Traceroute                 [RFC1393]
    1     0     19   147 ADDEXT - Address Extension     [Ullmann IPv7]
    1     0     21   149 SDB    - Selective Directed Broadcast [Graff]
    1     0     23   151 DPS    - Dynamic Packet State         [Malis]
    1     0     24   152 UMP    - Upstream Multicast Pkt.  [Farinacci]
 The IP options "MTU Probe" (MTUP, value 11) and "MTU Reply" (MTUR,
 value 12) were initially defined in [RFC1063] and have already been
 deprecated by [RFC1191].

4. Changing the Status of the Corresponding RFCs to Historic

 Per this document, the RFC Editor has changed the status of
 [RFC1385], [RFC1393], [RFC1475], and [RFC1770] to Historic.

5. Security Considerations

 This document does not modify the security properties of the IPv4
 options being deprecated.

6. Acknowledgments

 The authors would like to thank Ron Bonica for his guidance.
 The authors would like to thank Ran Atkinson, Fred Baker, Deborah
 Estrin, Dino Farinacci, Andrew Malis, Gene Tsudik, and Bill VerSteeg
 for providing insights on some of the options being formally
 deprecated by this document.

Pignataro & Gont Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 6814 Deprecating Some IPv4 Options November 2012

7. References

7.1. Normative References

 [RFC791]   Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, September
            1981.
 [RFC1122]  Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
            Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, October 1989.

7.2. Informative References

 [BIDIR-PIM] Estrin, D. and D. Farinacci, "Bi-Directional Shared Trees
            in PIM-SM",  Work in Progress, May 1999.
 [DIFFSERV-DPS]
            Stoica, I., Zhang, H., Venkitaraman, N., and J. Mysore,
            "Per Hop Behaviors Based on Dynamic Packet State", Work in
            Progress, October 2002.
 [IANA-IP]  Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, "IP OPTION NUMBERS",
            <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ip-parameters>.
 [RFC1063]  Mogul, J., Kent, C., Partridge, C., and K. McCloghrie, "IP
            MTU discovery options", RFC 1063, July 1988.
 [RFC1191]  Mogul, J. and S. Deering, "Path MTU discovery", RFC 1191,
            November 1990.
 [RFC1385]  Wang, Z., "EIP: The Extended Internet Protocol", RFC 1385,
            November 1992.
 [RFC1393]  Malkin, G., "Traceroute Using an IP Option", RFC 1393,
            January 1993.
 [RFC1475]  Ullmann, R., "TP/IX: The Next Internet", RFC 1475, June
            1993.
 [RFC1770]  Graff, C., "IPv4 Option for Sender Directed Multi-
            Destination Delivery", RFC 1770, March 1995.
 [RFC1812]  Baker, F., Ed., "Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers",
            RFC 1812, June 1995.
 [RFC2460]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
            (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.

Pignataro & Gont Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 6814 Deprecating Some IPv4 Options November 2012

 [RFC5015]  Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano,
            "Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-
            PIM)", RFC 5015, October 2007.
 [VISA87]   Estrin, D. and G. Tsudik, "VISA Scheme for Inter-
            Organizational Network Security", IEEE Symposium on
            Security and Privacy (S&P), 1987.
 [VISA89]   Estrin, D., Mogul, J., and G. Tsudik, "VISA Protocols for
            Controlling Inter-Organizational Datagram Flow", IEEE
            Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 1989.

Authors' Addresses

 Carlos Pignataro
 Cisco Systems
 7200-12 Kit Creek Road
 Research Triangle Park, NC  27709
 United States
 EMail: cpignata@cisco.com
 Fernando Gont
 UTN-FRH / SI6 Networks
 Evaristo Carriego 2644
 Haedo, Provincia de Buenos Aires  1706
 Argentina
 Phone: +54 11 4650 8472
 EMail: fgont@si6networks.com
 URI:   http://www.si6networks.com

Pignataro & Gont Standards Track [Page 6]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc6814.txt · Last modified: 2012/11/29 01:01 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki