rfc:rfc6608
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Dong Request for Comments: 6608 M. Chen Updates: 4271 Huawei Technologies Category: Standards Track A. Suryanarayana ISSN: 2070-1721 Cisco Systems
May 2012
Subcodes for BGP Finite State Machine Error
Abstract
This document defines several subcodes for the BGP Finite State Machine (FSM) Error that could provide more information to help network operators in diagnosing BGP FSM issues and correlating network events. This document updates RFC 4271.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6608.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Dong, et al. Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 6608 BGP FSM Error Subcode May 2012
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. Requirements Language ...........................................2
3. Definition of Finite State Machine Error Subcodes ...............2
4. Usage of FSM Error Subcodes .....................................2
5. Security Considerations .........................................3
6. IANA Considerations .............................................3
7. Contributors ....................................................4
8. Acknowledgements ................................................4
9. References ......................................................4
9.1. Normative References .......................................4
9.2. Informative References .....................................4
1. Introduction
This document defines several subcodes for the BGP [RFC4271] Finite State Machine (FSM) Error that could provide more information to help network operators in diagnosing BGP FSM issues and correlating network events. This information is also helpful to developers in lab situations. This document updates [RFC4271] by requiring that BGP implementations insert appropriate FSM Error subcodes in NOTIFICATION messages for BGP FSM errors.
2. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
3. Definition of Finite State Machine Error Subcodes
This document defines the following subcodes for the BGP Finite State Machine Error:
0 - Unspecified Error
1 - Receive Unexpected Message in OpenSent State
2 - Receive Unexpected Message in OpenConfirm State
3 - Receive Unexpected Message in Established State
4. Usage of FSM Error Subcodes
If a BGP speaker receives an unexpected message (e.g., KEEPALIVE/ UPDATE/ROUTE-REFRESH message) on a session in OpenSent state, it MUST send to the neighbor a NOTIFICATION message with the Error Code
Dong, et al. Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 6608 BGP FSM Error Subcode May 2012
Finite State Machine Error and the Error Subcode "Receive Unexpected Message in OpenSent State". The Data field is a 1-octet, unsigned integer that indicates the type of the unexpected message.
If a BGP speaker receives an unexpected message (e.g., OPEN/UPDATE/ ROUTE-REFRESH message) on a session in OpenConfirm state, it MUST send a NOTIFICATION message with the Error Code Finite State Machine Error and the Error Subcode "Receive Unexpected Message in OpenConfirm State" to the neighbor. The Data field is a 1-octet, unsigned integer that indicates the type of the unexpected message.
If a BGP speaker receives an unexpected message (e.g., OPEN message) on a session in Established State, it MUST send to the neighbor a NOTIFICATION message with the Error Code Finite State Machine Error and the Error Subcode "Receive Unexpected Message in Established State". The Data field is a 1-octet, unsigned integer that indicates the type of the unexpected message.
5. Security Considerations
Specification, implementation, and deployment of the proposed BGP FSM Error subcodes could make BGP implementation fingerprinting easier and probably more accurate. Operators using BGP need to consider this as an operational security consideration of their BGP deployment decisions.
[BFMR2010] discusses a number of BGP security issues and potential solutions that might be relevant both to BGP implementers and BGP operators.
6. IANA Considerations
IANA has created the registry "BGP Finite State Machine Error Subcodes", within the "BGP Error Subcodes" registry, with a Registration Procedure of "Standards Action" as defined in [RFC5226] (early allocation of such subcodes is allowed, in accordance with [RFC4020]).
The registry has been populated with the following values:
Value Name 0 Unspecified Error 1 Receive Unexpected Message in OpenSent State 2 Receive Unexpected Message in OpenConfirm State 3 Receive Unexpected Message in Established State
Dong, et al. Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 6608 BGP FSM Error Subcode May 2012
7. Contributors
The following individuals contributed to this document:
Xiaoming Gu EMail: guxiaoming@huawei.com
Chong Wang EMail: chongwang@huawei.com
8. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank John Scudder, Jeffrey Haas, Susan Hares, Keyur Patel, Enke Chen, Ruediger Volk, and Ran Atkinson for their valuable suggestions and comments to this document.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4020] Kompella, K. and A. Zinin, "Early IANA Allocation of
Standards Track Code Points", BCP 100, RFC 4020, February
2005.
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, January
2006.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
May 2008.
9.2. Informative References
[BFMR2010] Butler, K., Farley, T., Mcdaniel, P., and J. Rexford, "A
Survey of BGP Security Issues and Solutions", January
2010.
Dong, et al. Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 6608 BGP FSM Error Subcode May 2012
Authors' Addresses
Jie Dong Huawei Technologies Huawei Building, No.156 Beiqing Rd Beijing 100095 China
EMail: jie.dong@huawei.com
Mach Chen Huawei Technologies Huawei Building, No.156 Beiqing Rd Beijing 100095 China
EMail: mach.chen@huawei.com
Anantharamu Suryanarayana Cisco Systems USA
EMail: asuryana@cisco.com
Dong, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc6608.txt · Last modified: 2012/05/07 19:00 by 127.0.0.1