GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc6375

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. Frost, Ed. Request for Comments: 6375 S. Bryant, Ed. Category: Informational Cisco Systems ISSN: 2070-1721 September 2011

            A Packet Loss and Delay Measurement Profile
                 for MPLS-Based Transport Networks

Abstract

 Procedures and protocol mechanisms to enable efficient and accurate
 measurement of packet loss, delay, and throughput in MPLS networks
 are defined in RFC 6374.
 The MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) is the set of MPLS protocol
 functions applicable to the construction and operation of packet-
 switched transport networks.
 This document describes a profile of the general MPLS loss, delay,
 and throughput measurement techniques that suffices to meet the
 specific requirements of MPLS-TP.
 This document is a product of a joint Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF) / International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication
 Standardization Sector (ITU-T) effort to include an MPLS Transport
 Profile within the IETF MPLS and Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge
 (PWE3) architectures to support the capabilities and functionalities
 of a packet transport network as defined by the ITU-T.

Status of This Memo

 This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
 published for informational purposes.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
 approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
 Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6375.

Frost & Bryant Informational [Page 1] RFC 6375 MPLS-TP Loss and Delay Measurement September 2011

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.

1. Introduction

 Procedures for the measurement of packet loss, delay, and throughput
 in MPLS networks are defined in [RFC6374].  This document describes a
 profile, i.e., a simplified subset, of these procedures that suffices
 to meet the specific requirements of MPLS-based transport networks
 [RFC5921] as defined in [RFC5860].  This profile is presented for the
 convenience of implementors who are concerned exclusively with the
 transport network context.
 The use of the profile specified in this document is purely optional.
 Implementors wishing to provide enhanced functionality that is within
 the scope of [RFC6374] but outside the scope of this profile may do
 so, whether or not the implementation is restricted to the transport
 network context.
 The assumption of this profile is that the devices involved in a
 measurement operation are configured for measurement by a means
 external to the measurement protocols themselves, for example, via a
 Network Management System (NMS) or separate configuration protocol.
 The manageability considerations in [RFC6374] apply, and further
 information on MPLS-TP network management can be found in [RFC5950].
 This document is a product of a joint Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF) / International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication
 Standardization Sector (ITU-T) effort to include an MPLS Transport
 Profile within the IETF MPLS and Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge
 (PWE3) architectures to support the capabilities and functionalities
 of a packet transport network as defined by the ITU-T.

Frost & Bryant Informational [Page 2] RFC 6375 MPLS-TP Loss and Delay Measurement September 2011

2. MPLS-TP Measurement Considerations

 The measurement considerations discussed in Section 2.9 of [RFC6374]
 apply also in the context of MPLS-TP, except for the following, which
 pertain to topologies excluded from MPLS-TP:
 o  Equal Cost Multipath considerations (Section 2.9.4 of [RFC6374])
 o  Considerations for direct Loss Measurement (LM) in the presence of
    Label Switched Paths constructed via the Label Distribution
    Protocol (LDP) or utilizing Penultimate Hop Popping (Section 2.9.8
    of [RFC6374])

3. Packet Loss Measurement (LM) Profile

 When an LM session is externally configured, the values of several
 protocol parameters can be fixed in advance at the endpoints involved
 in the session, so that negotiation of these parameters is not
 required.  These parameters, and their default values as specified by
 this profile, are as follows:
 Parameter                                 Default Value
 ----------------------------------------- --------------------------
 Query control code                        In-band Response Requested
 Byte/packet Count (B) Flag                Packet count
 Traffic-class-specific (T) Flag           Traffic-class-scoped
 Origin Timestamp Format (OTF)             Truncated IEEE 1588v2
 A simple implementation may assume that external configuration will
 ensure that both ends of the communication are using the default
 values for these parameters.  However, implementations are strongly
 advised to validate the values of these parameters in received
 messages so that configuration inconsistencies can be detected and
 reported.
 LM message rates (and test message rates, when inferred LM is used)
 should be configurable by the network operator on a per-channel
 basis.  The following intervals should be supported:
 Message Type   Supported Intervals
 -------------- ------------------------------------------------------
 LM Message     100 milliseconds, 1 second, 10 seconds, 1 minute, 10
                minutes
 Test Message   10 milliseconds, 100 milliseconds, 1 second, 10
                seconds, 1 minute

Frost & Bryant Informational [Page 3] RFC 6375 MPLS-TP Loss and Delay Measurement September 2011

4. Packet Delay Measurement (DM) Profile

 When a DM session is externally configured, the values of several
 protocol parameters can be fixed in advance at the endpoints involved
 in the session, so that negotiation of these parameters is not
 required.  These parameters, and their default values as specified by
 this profile, are as follows:
 Parameter                                  Default Value
 ------------------------------------------ --------------------------
 Query control code                         In-band Response Requested
 Querier Timestamp Format (QTF)             Truncated IEEE 1588v2
 Responder Timestamp Format (RTF)           Truncated IEEE 1588v2
 Responder's Preferred Timestamp Format     Truncated IEEE 1588v2
 (RPTF)
 A simple implementation may assume that external configuration will
 ensure that both ends of the communication are using the default
 values for these parameters.  However, implementations are strongly
 advised to validate the values of these parameters in received
 messages so that configuration inconsistencies can be detected and
 reported.
 DM message rates should be configurable by the network operator on a
 per-channel basis.  The following message intervals should be
 supported: 1 second, 10 seconds, 1 minute, 10 minutes.

5. Security Considerations

 This document delineates a subset of the procedures specified in
 [RFC6374], and as such introduces no new security considerations in
 itself.  The security considerations discussed in [RFC6374] also
 apply to the profile presented in this document.  General
 considerations for MPLS-TP network security can be found in
 [SECURITY-FRAMEWORK].

Frost & Bryant Informational [Page 4] RFC 6375 MPLS-TP Loss and Delay Measurement September 2011

6. References

6.1. Normative References

 [RFC5860]  Vigoureux, M., Ward, D., and M. Betts, "Requirements for
            Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in MPLS
            Transport Networks", RFC 5860, May 2010.
 [RFC6374]  Frost, D. and S. Bryant, "Packet Loss and Delay
            Measurement for MPLS Networks", RFC 6374, September 2011.

6.2. Informative References

 [RFC5921]  Bocci, M., Bryant, S., Frost, D., Levrau, L., and L.
            Berger, "A Framework for MPLS in Transport Networks",
            RFC 5921, July 2010.
 [RFC5950]  Mansfield, S., Gray, E., and K. Lam, "Network Management
            Framework for MPLS-based Transport Networks", RFC 5950,
            September 2010.
 [SECURITY-FRAMEWORK]
            Fang, L., Niven-Jenkins, B., and S. Mansfield, "MPLS-TP
            Security Framework", Work in Progress, May 2011.

Authors' Addresses

 Dan Frost (editor)
 Cisco Systems
 EMail: danfrost@cisco.com
 Stewart Bryant (editor)
 Cisco Systems
 EMail: stbryant@cisco.com

Frost & Bryant Informational [Page 5]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc6375.txt · Last modified: 2011/09/18 17:24 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki