Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools

Problem, Formatting or Query -  Send Feedback

Was this page helpful?-10+1


Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) I. Johansson Request for Comments: 6236 Ericsson AB Category: Standards Track K. Jung ISSN: 2070-1721 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

                                                              May 2011
             Negotiation of Generic Image Attributes in
               the Session Description Protocol (SDP)


 This document proposes a new generic session setup attribute to make
 it possible to negotiate different image attributes such as image
 size.  A possible use case is to make it possible for a low-end hand-
 held terminal to display video without the need to rescale the image,
 something that may consume large amounts of memory and processing
 power.  The document also helps to maintain an optimal bitrate for
 video as only the image size that is desired by the receiver is

Status of This Memo

 This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 ( in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

 1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   1.1.  Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
 2.  Conventions Used in This Document  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
 3.  Specification of the 'imageattr' SDP Attribute . . . . . . . .  5
   3.1.  Attribute Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     3.1.1.  Overall View of Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   3.2.  Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     3.2.1.  No imageattr in First Offer  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     3.2.2.  Different Payload Type Numbers in Offer and Answer . . 11
     3.2.3.  Asymmetry  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     3.2.4.  sendonly and recvonly  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     3.2.5.  Sample Aspect Ratio  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
     3.2.6.  SDPCapNeg Support  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
     3.2.7.  Interaction with Codec Parameters  . . . . . . . . . . 14
     3.2.8.  Change of Display in Middle of Session . . . . . . . . 16
     3.2.9.  Use with Layered Codecs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
     3.2.10. Addition of Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
 4.  Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
   4.1.  A High-Level Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
   4.2.  Detailed Examples  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
     4.2.1.  Example 1  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
     4.2.2.  Example 2  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
     4.2.3.  Example 3  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
     4.2.4.  Example 4  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
 5.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
 6.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
 7.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
 8.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
   8.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
   8.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

1. Introduction

 This document proposes a new SDP attribute to make it possible to
 negotiate different image attributes, such as image size.  The term
 image size is defined here, as it may differ from the physical screen
 size of, for instance, a hand-held terminal.  As an example, it may
 be beneficial to display a video image on a part of the physical
 screen and leave space on the screen for other features such as menus
 and other info.
 Allowing negotiation of the image size provides a number of benefits:
 o  Less image distortion: Rescaling of images introduces additional
    distortion, something that can be avoided (at least on the
    receiver side) if the image size can be negotiated.
 o  Reduced receiver complexity: Image rescaling can be quite
    computation intensive.  For low-end devices, this can be a
 o  Optimal quality for the given bitrate: The sender does not need to
    encode an entire CIF (352x288) image if only an image size of
    288x256 is displayed on the receiver screen.
 o  Memory requirement: The receiver device will know the size of the
    image and can then allocate memory accordingly.
 o  Optimal aspect ratio: The indication of the supported image sizes
    and aspect ratio allows the receiver to select the most
    appropriate combination based on its rescaling capabilities and
    the desired rendering.  For example, if a sender proposes three
    resolutions in its SDP offer (100x200, 200x100, and 100x100) with
    sar=1.0 (1:1) etc., then the receiver can select the option that
    fits the receiver screen best.
 In cases where rescaling is not implemented (for example, rescaling
 is not mandatory to implement in H.264 [H.264]), the indication of
 the image attributes may still provide an optimal use of bandwidth
 because the attribute will give the encoder a better indication about
 what image size is preferred anyway and will thus help to avoid
 wasting bandwidth by encoding with an unnecessarily large resolution.
 For implementers that are considering rescaling issues, it is worth
 noting that there are several benefits to doing it on the sender
 o  Rescaling on the sender/encoder side is likely to be easier to do
    as the camera-related software/hardware already contains the

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

    necessary functionality for zooming/cropping/trimming/sharpening
    the video signal.  Moreover, rescaling is generally done in RGB or
    YUV domains and should not depend on the codecs used.
 o  The encoder may be able to encode in a number of formats but may
    not know which format to choose as, without the image attribute,
    it does not know the receiver's performance or preference.
 o  The quality drop due to digital domain rescaling using
    interpolation is likely to be lower if it is done before the video
    encoding rather than after the decoding especially when low
    bitrate video coding is used.
 o  If low-complexity rescaling operations such as simple cropping
    must be performed, the benefit with having this functionality on
    the sender side is that it is then possible to present a miniature
    "what you send" image on the display to help the user to frame the
    image correctly.
 Several of the existing standards ([H.263], [H.264], and [MPEG-4])
 have support for different resolutions at different framerates.  The
 purpose of this document is to provide for a generic mechanism, which
 is targeted mainly at the negotiation of the image size.  However, to
 make it more general, the attribute is named 'imageattr'.
 This document is limited to point-to-point unicast communication
 scenarios.  The attribute may be used in centralized conferencing
 scenarios as well but due to the abundance of configuration options,
 it may then be difficult to come up with a configuration that fits
 all parties.

1.1. Requirements

 The design of the image attribute is based on the following
 requirements, which are listed only for informational purposes:
 REQ-1:  Support the indication of one or more set(s) of image
    attributes that the SDP endpoint wishes to receive or send.  Each
    image attribute set must include a specific image size.
 REQ-2:  Support setup/negotiation of image attributes, meaning that
    each side in the Offer/Answer should be able to negotiate the
    image attributes it prefers to send and receive.
 REQ-3:  Interoperate with codec-specific parameters such as sprop-
    parameter-sets in [H.264] or config in [MPEG-4].

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 REQ-4:  Make the attribute generic with as few codec specific
    details/tricks as possible in order to be codec agnostic.
 Besides the above mentioned requirements, the requirement below may
 be applicable.
 OPT-1:  The image attribute should support the description of image-
    related attributes for various types of media, including video,
    pictures, images, etc.

2. Conventions Used in This Document

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3. Specification of the 'imageattr' SDP Attribute

 This section defines the SDP image attribute 'imageattr', which can
 be used in an SDP Offer/Answer exchange to indicate various image
 attribute parameters.  In this document, we define the following
 image attribute parameters: image resolution, sample aspect ratio
 (sar), allowed range in picture aspect ratio (par) and the preference
 of a given parameter set over another (q).  The attribute is
 extensible and guidelines for defining additional parameters are
 provided in Section 3.2.10.

3.1. Attribute Syntax

 In this section, the syntax of the 'imageattr' attribute is
 described.  The 'imageattr' attribute is a media-level attribute.
 The section is split up in two parts: the first gives an overall view
 of the syntax, and the second describes how the syntax is used.

3.1.1. Overall View of Syntax

 The syntax for the image attribute is in ABNF [RFC5234]:
     image-attr = "imageattr:" PT 1*2( 1*WSP ( "send" / "recv" )
                                       1*WSP attr-list )
     PT = 1*DIGIT / "*"
     attr-list = ( set *(1*WSP set) ) / "*"
       ;  WSP and DIGIT defined in [RFC5234]
     set= "[" "x=" xyrange "," "y=" xyrange *( "," key-value ) "]"
                ; x is the horizontal image size range (pixel count)
                ; y is the vertical image size range (pixel count)

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

     key-value = ( "sar=" srange )
               / ( "par=" prange )
               / ( "q=" qvalue )
                ; Key-value MAY be extended with other keyword
                ;  parameters.
                ; At most, one instance each of sar, par, or q
                ;  is allowed in a set.
                ; sar (sample aspect ratio) is the sample aspect ratio
                ;  associated with the set (optional, MAY be ignored)
                ; par (picture aspect ratio) is the allowed
                ;  ratio between the display's x and y physical
                ;  size (optional)
                ; q (optional, range [0.0..1.0], default value 0.5)
                ;  is the preference for the given set,
                ;  a higher value means a higher preference
     onetonine = "1" / "2" / "3" / "4" / "5" / "6" / "7" / "8" / "9"
                ; Digit between 1 and 9
     xyvalue = onetonine *5DIGIT
                ; Digit between 1 and 9 that is
                ; followed by 0 to 5 other digits
     step = xyvalue
     xyrange = ( "[" xyvalue ":" [ step ":" ] xyvalue "]" )
                ; Range between a lower and an upper value
                ; with an optional step, default step = 1
                ; The rightmost occurrence of xyvalue MUST have a
                ; higher value than the leftmost occurrence.
             / ( "[" xyvalue 1*( "," xyvalue ) "]" )
                ; Discrete values separated by ','
             / ( xyvalue )
                ; A single value
     spvalue = ( "0" "." onetonine *3DIGIT )
                ; Values between 0.1000 and 0.9999
             / ( onetonine "." 1*4DIGIT )
                ; Values between 1.0000 and 9.9999
     srange =  ( "[" spvalue 1*( "," spvalue ) "]" )
                ; Discrete values separated by ','.
                ; Each occurrence of spvalue MUST be
                ; greater than the previous occurrence.
             / ( "[" spvalue "-" spvalue "]" )
                ; Range between a lower and an upper level (inclusive)
                ; The second occurrence of spvalue MUST have a higher
                ; value than the first
             / ( spvalue )
                ; A single value

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

     prange =  ( "[" spvalue "-" spvalue "]" )
                ; Range between a lower and an upper level (inclusive)
                ; The second occurrence of spvalue MUST have a higher
                ; value than the first
     qvalue  = ( "0" "." 1*2DIGIT )
             / ( "1" "." 1*2("0") )
                ; Values between 0.00 and 1.00
 o  The attribute typically contains a "send" and a "recv" keyword.
    These specify the preferences for the media once the session is
    set up, in the send and receive direction respectively from the
    point of view of the sender of the session description.  One of
    the keywords ("send" or "recv") MAY be omitted; see Section 3.2.4
    and Section 3.2.2 for a description of cases when this may be
 o  The "send" keyword and corresponding attribute list (attr-list)
    MUST NOT occur more than once per image attribute.
 o  The "recv" keyword and corresponding attribute list (attr-list)
    MUST NOT occur more than once per image attribute.
 o  PT is the payload type number; it MAY be set to "*" (wild card) to
    indicate that the attribute applies to all payload types in the
    media description.
 o  For sendrecv streams, both of the send and recv directions SHOULD
    be present in the SDP.
 o  For inactive streams it is RECOMMENDED that both of the send and
    recv directions are present in the SDP. Parameter Rules

 The following rules apply for the parameters.
 Payload type number (PT):  The image attribute is bound to a specific
    codec by means of the payload type number.  A wild card (*) can be
    specified for the payload type number to indicate that it applies
    to all payload types in the media description.  Several image
    attributes can be defined, for instance for different video codec
    alternatives.  This however requires that the payload type numbers
    differ.  Note that the attribute is associated to the codec(s),
    for instance an SDP offer may specify payload type number 101
    while the answer may specify 102, this may make it troublesome to

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

    specify a payload type number with the 'imageattr' attribute.  See
    Section 3.2.2 for a discussion and recommendation how this is
 Preference (q):  The preference for each set is 0.5 by default;
    setting the optional q parameter to another value makes it
    possible to set different preferences for the sets.  A higher
    value gives a higher preference for the given set.
 sar:  The sar (storage aspect ratio) parameter specifies the sample
    aspect ratio associated to the given range of x and y values.  The
    sar parameter is defined as dx/dy where dx and dy are the physical
    size of the pixels.  Square pixels gives a sar=1.0.  The parameter
    sar MAY be expressed as a range or as a single value.
    If this parameter is not present, a default sar value of 1.0 is
    The interpretation of sar differs between the send and the receive
  • In the send direction, sar defines a specific sample aspect

ratio associated to a given x and y image size (range).

  • In the recv direction, sar expresses that the receiver of the

given medium prefers to receive a given x and y resolution with

       a given sample aspect ratio.
    See Section 3.2.5 for a more detailed discussion.
    The sar parameter will likely not solve all the issues that are
    related to different sample aspect ratios, but it can help to
    solve them and reduce aspect ratio distortion.
    The response MUST NOT include a sar parameter if there is no
    acceptable value given.  The reason for this is that if the
    response includes a sar parameter it is interpreted as "sar
    parameter accepted", while removal of the sar parameter is treated
    as "sar parameter not accepted".  For this reason, it is safer to
    remove an unacceptable sar parameter altogether.
 par:  The par (width/height = x/y ratio) parameter indicates a range
    of allowed ratios between x and y physical size (picture aspect
    ratio).  This is used to limit the number of x and y image size
    combinations; par is given as

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 where ratio_min and ratio_max are the min and max allowed picture
 aspect ratios.
 If sar and the sample aspect ratio that the receiver actually uses in
 the display are the same (or close), the relation between the x and y
 pixel resolution and the physical size of the image is
 straightforward.  If however sar differs from the sample aspect ratio
 of the receiver display, this must be taken into consideration when
 the x and y pixel resolution alternatives are sorted out.  See
 Section 4.2.4 for an example of this. Offer/Answer Rules

 In accordance with [RFC3264], offer/answer exchange of the image
 attribute is as follows.
 o  Offerer sending the offer:
  • The offerer must be able to support the image attributes that

it offers, unless the offerer has expressed a wild card (*) in

       the attribute list.
  • It is recommended that a device that sees no reason to use the

image attribute includes the attribute with wild cards (*) in

       the attribute lists anyway for the send and recv directions.
       An example of this looks like:
        a=imageattr:97 send * recv *
 This gives the answerer the possibility of expressing its
 preferences.  The use of wild cards introduces a risk that the
 message size can increase in an uncontrolled way.  To reduce this
 risk, these wild cards SHOULD only be replaced by an as small set as
 o  Answerer receiving the offer and sending the answer:
  • The answerer may choose to keep the image attribute but is not

required to do so.

  • The answerer may, for its receive and send direction, include

one or more entries that it can support from the set of entries

       proposed in the offer.
  • The answerer may also, for its receive and send direction,

replace the entries with a complete new set of entries

       different from the original proposed by the offerer.  The

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

       implementor of this feature should however be aware that this
       may cause extra offer/answer exchanges.
  • The answerer may also remove its send direction completely if

it is deemed that it cannot support any of the proposed

  • The answerer should not include an image attribute in the

answer if it was not present in the offer.

 o  Offerer receiving the answer:
  • If the image attribute is not included in the SDP answer the

offerer SHOULD continue to process the answer as if this

       mechanism had not been offered.
  • If the image attribute is included in the SDP answer but none

of the entries are usable or acceptable, the offerer MUST

       resort to other methods to determine the appropriate image
       size.  In this case, the offerer must also issue a new offer/
       answer without the image attribute to avoid misunderstandings
       between the offerer and answerer.  This will avoid the risk of
       infinite negotiations.

3.2. Considerations

3.2.1. No imageattr in First Offer

 When the initial offer does not contain the 'imageattr' attribute,
 the rules in Section require the attribute to be absent in
 the answer.  The reasons for this are:
 o  The offerer of the initial SDP is not likely to understand the
    image attribute if it did not include it in the offer, bearing in
    mind that Section 3.1.1 recommends that the offerer provide the
    attribute with wild carded parameters if it has no preference.
 o  Inclusion of the image attribute in the answer may come in
    conflict with the rules in Section, especially the rules
    that apply to "offerer receiving the answer".
 For the above reasons, it is RECOMMENDED that a device that sees no
 reason to use the image attribute includes the attribute with wild
 cards (*) in the attribute lists anyway for the send and recv

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 10] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

3.2.2. Different Payload Type Numbers in Offer and Answer

 In some cases, the answer may specify a different media payload type
 number than the offer.  As an example, the offer SDP may have the
     m=video 49154 RTP/AVP 99
 while the answer SDP may have the m-line
     m=video 49154 RTP/AVP 100
 If the image attribute in the offer specifies payload type number 99,
 this attribute will then have no meaning in the answerers receive
 direction as the m-line specifies media payload type number 100.
 There are a few ways to solve this.
 1.  Use a wild card "*" as the payload type number in the image
     attribute in the offer SDP.  The answer SDP also uses the wild
     card.  The drawback with this approach is that this attribute
     then applies to all payload type numbers in the media
 2.  Specify a wild card "*" as the payload type number in the image
     attribute in the answer SDP.  The offer SDP may contain a defined
     payload type number in the image attribute but the answer SDP
     replaces this with a wild card.  The drawback here is similar to
     what is listed above.
 3.  The image attribute is split in two parts in the SDP answer.  For
     example the offer SDP (only the parts of interest in this
     discussion) looks like:
         m=video 49154 RTP/AVP 99
         a=imageattr:99 send ... recv ...
 The answer SDP looks like:
         m=video 49154 RTP/AVP 100
         a=imageattr:99 send ...
         a=imageattr:100 recv ...
 This alternative does not pose any drawbacks.  Moreover, it allows
 specification of different image attributes if more than one payload
 type is specified in the offer SDP.

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 11] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 Of the alternatives listed above, the last one MUST be used as it is
 the most safe.  The other alternatives MUST NOT be used.

3.2.3. Asymmetry

 While the image attribute supports asymmetry, there are some
 limitations.  One important limitation is that the codec being used
 can only support up to a given maximum resolution for a given profile
 As an example, H.264 [H.264] with profile level 1.2 does not support
 higher resolution than 352x288 (CIF).  The offer/answer rules imply
 that the same profile level must be used in both directions.  This
 means that in an asymmetric scenario where Alice wants an image size
 of 580x360 and Bob wants 150x120, profile level 2.2 is needed in both
 directions even though profile level 1 would have been sufficient in
 one direction.
 Currently, the only solution to this problem is to specify two
 unidirectional media descriptions.  Note however that the asymmetry
 issue for the H.264 codec is solved by means of the level-asymmetry-
 allowed parameter in [RFC6184].

3.2.4. sendonly and recvonly

 If the directional attributes a=sendonly or a=recvonly are given for
 a medium, there is of course no need to specify the image attribute
 for both directions.  Therefore, one of the directions in the
 attribute may be omitted.  However, it may be good to do the image
 attribute negotiation in both directions in case the session is
 updated for media in both directions at a later stage.

3.2.5. Sample Aspect Ratio

 The relationship between the sar parameter and the x and y pixel
 resolution deserves some extra discussion.  Consider the offer from
 Alice to Bob (we set the recv direction aside for the moment):
     a=imageattr:97 send [x=720,y=576,sar=1.1]
 If the receiver display has square pixels, the 720x576 image would
 need to be rescaled to for example 792x576 or 720x524 to ensure a
 correct image aspect ratio.  This in practice means that rescaling
 would need to be performed on the receiver side, something that is
 contrary to the spirit of this document.

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 To avoid this problem Alice may specify a range of values for the sar
 parameter like:
     a=imageattr:97 send [x=720,y=576,sar=[0.91,1.0,1.09,1.45]]
 Meaning that Alice can encode with any of the mentioned sample aspect
 ratios, leaving Bob to decide which one he prefers.

3.2.6. SDPCapNeg Support

 The image attribute can be used within the SDP Capability Negotiation
 [RFC5939] framework and its use is then specified using the "a=acap"
 parameter.  An example is
     a=acap:1 imageattr:97 send [x=720,y=576,sar=[0.91,1.0,1.09,1.45]]
 For use with SDP Media Capability Negotiation extension
 [SDPMedCapNeg], where it is no longer possible to specify payload
 type numbers, it is possible to use the parameter substitution rule,
 an example of this is
    a=mcap:1 video H264/90000
    a=acap:1 imageattr:%1% send [x=720,y=576,sar=[0.91,1.0,1.09,1.45]]
 where %1% maps to media capability number 1.
 It is also possible to use the a=mscap attribute like in the example
     a=mcap:1 video H264/90000
     a=mscap:1 imageattr send [x=720,y=576,sar=[0.91,1.0,1.09,1.45]]

3.2.7. Interaction with Codec Parameters

 As the SDP for most codecs already specifies some kind of indication
 of, for example, the image size, at session setup, measures must be
 taken to avoid conflicts between the image attribute and this already
 existing information.
 The following subsections describe the most well known codecs and how
 they define image-size related information.  Section outlines
 a few possible solutions, but this document does not make a
 recommendation for any of them.

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 13] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011 H.263

 The payload format for H.263 [H.263] is described in [RFC4629].
 H.263 defines (on the fmtp line) a list of image sizes and their
 maximum frame rates (profiles) that the offerer can receive.  The
 answerer is not allowed to modify this list and must reject a payload
 type that contains an unsupported profile.  The CUSTOM profile may be
 used for image size negotiation but support for asymmetry requires
 the specification of two unidirectional media descriptions using the
 sendonly/recvonly attributes. H.264

 The payload format for H.264 [H.264] is described in [RFC6184].
 H.264 defines information related to image size in the fmtp line by
 means of sprop-parameter-sets.  According to the specification,
 several sprop-parameter-sets may be defined for one payload type.
 The sprop-parameter-sets describe the image size (+ more) that the
 offerer sends in the stream and need not be complete.  This means
 that sprop-parameter-sets does not represent any negotiation and the
 answer is not allowed to change the sprop-parameter-sets.
 This configuration may be changed later inband if for instance image
 sizes need to be changed or added. MPEG-4

 The payload format for MPEG-4 [MPEG-4] is described in [RFC3016].
 MPEG-4 defines a config parameter on the fmtp line, which is a
 hexadecimal representation of the MPEG-4 visual configuration
 information.  This configuration does not represent any negotiation
 and the answer is not allowed to change the parameter.
 It is not possible to change the configuration using inband
 signaling. Possible Solutions

 The subsections above clearly indicate that this kind of information
 must be aligned well with the image attribute to avoid conflicts.
 There are a number of possible solutions, listed below without any

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 14] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 o  Ignore payload format parameters: This may not work well in the
    presence of bad channel conditions especially in the beginning of
    a session.  Moreover, this is not a good option for MPEG-4.
 o  Second session-wide offer/answer round: In the second offer/
    answer, the parameters specific to codec payload format are
    defined based on the outcome of the 'imageattr' negotiation.  The
    drawback with this is that setup of the entire session (including
    audio) may be delayed considerably, especially as the 'imageattr'
    negotiation can already itself cost up to two offer/answer rounds.
    Also, the conflict between the 'imageattr' negotiation and the
    parameters specific to payload format is still present after the
    first offer/answer round and a fuzzy/buggy implementation may
    start media before the second offer/answer is completed with
    unwanted results.
 o  Second session-wide offer/answer round only for video: This is
    similar to the alternative above with the exception that setup
    time for audio is not increased; moreover, the port number for
    video is set to 0 during the first offer answer round to avoid the
    flow of media.
    This has the effect that video will blend in some time after the
    audio is started (up to 2 seconds delay).  This alternative is
    likely the most clean-cut and failsafe.  The drawback is, as the
    port number in the first offer is always zero, the media startup
    will always be delayed even though it would in fact have been
    possible to start media after the first offer/answer round.
    Note that according to [RFC3264], a port number of zero means that
    the whole media line is rejected, meaning that a new offer for the
    same port number should be treated as a completely new stream and
    not as an update.  The safest way to solve this problem is to use
    preconditions; this is however outside the scope of this document.

3.2.8. Change of Display in Middle of Session

 A very likely scenario is that a user switches to another phone
 during a video telephony call or plugs a cellphone into an external
 monitor.  In both cases, it is very likely that a renegotiation is
 initiated using the SIP-REFER [RFC3515] or SIP-UPDATE [RFC3311]
 methods.  It is RECOMMENDED to negotiate the image size during this

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

3.2.9. Use with Layered Codecs

 As the image attribute is a media-level attribute, its use with
 layered codecs causes some concern.  If the layers are transported in
 different RTP streams, the layers are specified on different media
 descriptions, and the relation is specified using the grouping
 framework [RFC5888] and the depend attribute [RFC5583].  As it is not
 possible to specify only one image attribute for several media
 descriptions the solution is either to specify the same image
 attribute for each media description, or to only specify the image
 attribute for the base layer.

3.2.10. Addition of Parameters

 The image attribute allows for the addition of parameters in the
 future.  To make backwards adaptation possible, an entity that
 processes the attribute MUST ignore any unknown parameters in the
 offer and MUST NOT include them in the answer it generates.  Addition
 of future parameters that are not understood by the receiving
 endpoint may lead to ambiguities if mutual dependencies between
 parameters exist; therefore, addition of parameters must be done with
 great care.

4. Examples

 This section gives some more information on how to use the attribute
 by means of a high-level example and a few detailed examples.

4.1. A High-Level Example

 Assume that Alice wishes to set up a session with Bob and that Alice
 takes the first initiative.  The syntactical white-space delimiters
 (1*WSP) and double-quotes are removed to make reading easier.
 In the offer, Alice provides information for both the send and
 receive (recv) directions.  For the send direction, Alice provides a
 list that the answerer can select from.  For the receive direction,
 Alice may either specify a desired image size range right away or a *
 to instruct Bob to reply with a list of image sizes that Bob can
 support for sending.  Using the overall high level syntax the image
 attribute may then look like
     a=imageattr:PT send attr-list recv attr-list
     a=imageattr:PT send attr-list recv *

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 16] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 In the first alternative, the recv direction may be a full list of
 desired image size formats.  It may however (and most likely) just be
 a list with one alternative for the preferred x and y resolution.
 If Bob supports an x and y resolution in at least one of the X and Y
 ranges given in the send attr-list and in the recv attr-list of the
 offer, the answer from Bob will look like:
     a=imageattr:PT send attr-list recv attr-list
 and the offer/answer negotiation is done.  Note that the attr-list
 will likely be pruned in the answer.  While it may contain many
 different alternatives in the offer, it may in the end contain just
 one or two alternatives.
 If Bob does not support any x and y resolution in one of the provided
 send or recv ranges given in the send attr-list or in the recv attr-
 list, the corresponding part is removed completely.  For instance, if
 Bob doesn't support any of the offered alternatives in the recv attr-
 list in the offer, the answer from Bob would look like:
     a=imageattr:PT recv attr-list

4.2. Detailed Examples

 This section gives a few detailed examples.  It is assumed where
 needed that Alice initiates a session with Bob.

4.2.1. Example 1

 Two image resolution alternatives are offered with 800x640 with
 sar=1.1 having the highest preference.
 It is also indicated that Alice wishes to display video with a
 resolution of 330x250 on her display.
  a=imageattr:97 send [x=800,y=640,sar=1.1,q=0.6] [x=480,y=320] \
                 recv [x=330,y=250]
 In case Bob accepts the "recv [x=330,y=250]", the answer may look
  a=imageattr:97 recv [x=800,y=640,sar=1.1] \
                 send [x=330,y=250]
 indicating that the receiver (Bob) wishes the encoder (on Alice's
 side) to compensate for a sample aspect ratio of 1.1 (11:10) and
 desires an image size on its screen of 800x640.

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 17] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 There is however a possibility that "recv [x=330,y=250]" is not
 supported.  If the case, Bob may completely remove this part or
 replace it with a list of supported image sizes.
  a=imageattr:97 recv [x=800,y=640,sar=1.1] \
                 send [x=[320:16:640],y=[240:16:480],par=[1.2-1.3]]
 Alice can then select a valid image size that is closest to the one
 that was originally desired (336x256) and performs a second offer/
  a=imageattr:97 send [x=800,y=640,sar=1.1] \
                 recv [x=336,y=256]
 Bob replies with:
  a=imageattr:97 recv [x=800,y=640,sar=1.1] \
                 send [x=336,y=256]

4.2.2. Example 2

 Two image resolution sets are offered with the first having a higher
 preference (q=0.6).
  a=imageattr:97 \
    send [x=[480:16:800],y=[320:16:640],par=[1.2-1.3],q=0.6] \
         [x=[176:8:208],y=[144:8:176],par=[1.2-1.3]] \
    recv *
 The x-axis resolution can take the values 480 to 800 in 16 pixels
 steps and 176 to 208 in 8 pixels steps.  The par parameter limits the
 set of possible x and y screen resolution combinations such that
 800x640 (ratio=1.25) is a valid combination while 720x608
 (ratio=1.18) or 800x608 (ratio=1.31) are invalid combinations.
 For the recv direction (Bob->Alice), Bob is requested to provide a
 list of supported image sizes.

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 18] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

4.2.3. Example 3

 In this example, more of the SDP offer is shown.  A complicating
 factor is that the answerer changes the media payload type number in
 the offer/answer exchange.
  m=video 49154 RTP/AVP 99
  a=rtpmap:99 H264/90000
  a=fmtp:99 packetization-mode=0;profile-level-id=42e011; \
  a=imageattr:99 \
    send [x=176,y=144] [x=224,y=176] [x=272,y=224] [x=320,y=240] \
    recv [x=176,y=144] [x=224,y=176] [x=272,y=224,q=0.6] [x=320,y=240]
 In the send direction, sprop-parameter-sets is defined for a
 resolution of 320x240, which is the largest image size offered in the
 send direction.  This means that if 320x240 is selected, no
 additional offer/answer is necessary.  In the receive direction, four
 alternative image sizes are offered with 272x224 being the preferred
 The answer may look like:
  m=video 49154 RTP/AVP 100
  a=rtpmap:100 H264/90000
  a=fmtp:100 packetization-mode=0;profile-level-id=42e011; \
  a=imageattr:99 send [x=320,y=240]
  a=imageattr:100 recv [x=320,y=240]
 indicating (in this example) that the image size is 320x240 in both
 directions.  Although the offerer preferred 272x224 for the receive
 direction, the answerer might not be able to offer 272x224 or not
 allow encoding and decoding of video of different image sizes
 simultaneously.  The answerer sets new sprop-parameter-sets,
 constructed for both send and receive directions at the restricted
 conditions and image size of 320x240.
 Note also that, because the payload type number is changed by the
 answerer, the image attribute is also split in two parts according to
 the recommendation in Section 3.2.2.

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 19] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

4.2.4. Example 4

 This example illustrates in more detail how compensation for
 different sample aspect ratios can be negotiated with the image
 We set up a session between Alice and Bob; Alice is the offerer of
 the session.  The offer (from Alice) contains the image attribute
   a=imageattr:97 \
     send [x=400:16:800],y=[320:16:640],sar=[1.0-1.3],par=[1.2-1.3]] \
     recv [x=800,y=600,sar=1.1]
 First we consider the recv direction: The offerer (Alice) explicitly
 states that she wishes to receive the screen resolution 800x600.
 However, she also indicates that the screen on her display does not
 use square pixels; the sar value=1.1 means that Bob must (preferably)
 compensate for this.
 So, if Bob's video camera produces square pixels, and if Bob wishes
 to satisfy Alice's sar requirement, the image processing algorithm
 must rescale a 880x600 pixel image (880=800*1.1) to 800x600 pixels
 (could be done other ways).
 ... and now the send direction: Alice indicates that she can (in the
 image processing algorithms) rescale the image for sample aspect
 ratios in the range 1.0 to 1.3.  She can also provide a number of
 different image sizes (in pixels) ranging from 400x320 to 800x640.
 Bob inspects the offered sar and image sizes and responds with the
 modified image attribute.
  a=imageattr:97 \
    recv [x=464,y=384,sar=1.15] \
    send [x=800,y=600,sar=1.1]
 Alice will (in order to satisfy Bob's request) need to rescale the
 image from her video camera from 534x384 (534=464*1.15) to 464x384.

5. IANA Considerations

 Following the guidelines in [RFC4566], the IANA is requested to
 register one new SDP attribute:
 Attribute name:     imageattr
 Long form name:     Image attribute

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 20] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 Type of attribute:  Media-level
 Subject to charset: No
 Purpose:            This attribute defines the ability to negotiate
                     various image attributes such as image sizes.
                     The attribute contains a number of parameters
                     which can be modified in an offer/answer
 Appropriate values: See Section 3.1.1 of RFC 6236
 Contact name:       Authors of RFC 6236

6. Security Considerations

 The image attribute and especially the parameters that denote the
 image size can take on values that may cause memory or CPU exhaustion
 problems.  This may happen either as a consequence of a mistake by
 the sender of the SDP or as a result of an attack issued by a
 malicious SDP sender.  This issue is similar to the case where the
 a=fmtp line(s) may take on extreme values for the same reasons
 outlined above.
 A receiver of the SDP containing the image attribute MUST ensure that
 the parameters have values that are reasonable and that the device
 can handle the implications in terms of memory and CPU usage.
 Failure to do a sanity check on the parameters may result in memory
 or CPU exhaustion.
 In principle, for some SDPs containing the image attribute and for
 some deployments, it could be the case that simply checking the
 parameters is not sufficient to detect all potential Denial-of-
 Service (DoS) problems.  Implementers ought to consider whether there
 are any potential DoS attacks that would not be detected by simply
 checking parameters.

7. Acknowledgements

 The authors would like to thank the people who have contributed with
 objections and suggestions to this document and provided valuable
 guidance in the amazing video-coding world.  Special thanks to
 Clinton Priddle, Roni Even, Randell Jesup, and Dan Wing.  Thanks also
 to Robert Sparks and Paul Kyzivat for the help with the last fixes to
 get the attribute to work well with the offer/answer model.

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 21] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

8. References

8.1. Normative References

 [RFC2119]       Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
                 Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
 [RFC3264]       Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer
                 Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP)",
                 RFC 3264, June 2002.
 [RFC4566]       Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP:
                 Session Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.
 [RFC5234]       Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
                 Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
                 January 2008.
 [RFC5583]       Schierl, T. and S. Wenger, "Signaling Media Decoding
                 Dependency in the Session Description Protocol
                 (SDP)", RFC 5583, July 2009.
 [RFC5888]       Camarillo, G. and H. Schulzrinne, "The Session
                 Description Protocol (SDP) Grouping Framework",
                 RFC 5888, June 2010.

8.2. Informative References

 [H.263]         ITU-T, ITU-T Recommendation H.263 (2005): "Video
                 coding for low bit rate communication".
 [H.264]         ITU-T, ITU-T Recommendation H.264: "Advanced video
                 coding for generic audiovisual services",
 [MPEG-4]        ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 14496-2:2004: "Information
                 technology - Coding of audio-visual objects - Part 2:
 [RFC3016]       Kikuchi, Y., Nomura, T., Fukunaga, S., Matsui, Y.,
                 and H. Kimata, "RTP Payload Format for MPEG-4 Audio/
                 Visual Streams", RFC 3016, November 2000.
 [RFC3311]       Rosenberg, J., "The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
                 UPDATE Method", RFC 3311, October 2002.
 [RFC3515]       Sparks, R., "The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
                 Refer Method", RFC 3515, April 2003.

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 22] RFC 6236 Image Attributes in SDP May 2011

 [RFC4629]       Ott, H., Bormann, C., Sullivan, G., Wenger, S., and
                 R. Even, "RTP Payload Format for ITU-T Rec",
                 RFC 4629, January 2007.
 [RFC5939]       Andreasen, F., "Session Description Protocol (SDP)
                 Capability Negotiation", RFC 5939, September 2010.
 [RFC6184]       Wang, Y., Even, R., Kristensen, T., and R. Jesup,
                 "RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video", RFC 6184,
                 May 2011.
 [SDPMedCapNeg]  Gilman, R., Even, R., and F. Andreasen, "SDP Media
                 Mapabilities Negotiation", Work in Progress,
                 February 2011.

Authors' Addresses

 Ingemar Johansson
 Ericsson AB
 Laboratoriegrand 11
 SE-971 28 Luleae
 Phone: +46 73 0783289
 Kyunghun Jung
 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
 Dong Suwon P.O. Box 105
 416, Maetan-3Dong, Yeongtong-gu
 Suwon-city, Gyeonggi-do
 Korea 442-600
 Phone: +82 10 9909 4743

Johansson & Jung Standards Track [Page 23]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc6236.txt · Last modified: 2011/05/31 22:56 (external edit)