GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc6215

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Bocci Request for Comments: 6215 L. Levrau Updates: 5921 Alcatel-Lucent Category: Informational D. Frost ISSN: 2070-1721 Cisco

                                                            April 2011
               MPLS Transport Profile User-to-Network
                 and Network-to-Network Interfaces

Abstract

 The framework for MPLS in transport networks (RFC 5921) provides
 reference models for the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Transport
 Service Interfaces, which are a User-to-Network Interface (UNI), and
 a Network-to-Network Interface (NNI).  This document updates those
 reference models to show detailed reference points for these
 interfaces, along with further clarification of the functional
 architecture of MPLS-TP at a UNI and NNI.
 This document is a product of a joint Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF) / International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication
 Standardization Sector (ITU-T) effort to include an MPLS Transport
 Profile within the IETF MPLS and Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge
 (PWE3) architectures to support the capabilities and functionalities
 of a packet transport network as defined by the ITU-T.

Status of This Memo

 This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
 published for informational purposes.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
 approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
 Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6215.

Bocci, et al. Informational [Page 1] RFC 6215 MPLS-TP UNI and NNI April 2011

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.

1. Introduction

 The framework for MPLS in transport networks [RFC5921] provides
 reference models for the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Transport
 Service Interfaces, which are a User-to-Network Interface (UNI) and a
 Network-to-Network Interface (NNI).  This document updates those
 reference models to show detailed reference points for these
 interfaces, along with further clarification of the functional
 architecture of MPLS-TP at a UNI and NNI.
 This document is a product of a joint Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF) / International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication
 Standardization Sector (ITU-T) effort to include an MPLS Transport
 Profile within the IETF MPLS and PWE3 architectures to support the
 capabilities and functionalities of a packet transport network as
 defined by the ITU-T.

1.1. Updates to the MPLS-TP UNI and NNI

 The Transport Service Interfaces for MPLS-TP are defined in Section
 3.4.3 of [RFC5921].  These definitions are illustrated by showing
 MPLS-TP Provider Edges (PEs) containing a UNI and an NNI.  The
 figures illustrate the UNI and the NNI as a span.  However, it is
 convention to illustrate these interfaces as reference points.
 Furthermore, in the case of a UNI, it is useful to illustrate the
 distribution of UNI functions between the Customer Edge (CE) side and
 the PE side of the UNI, i.e., the UNI-C (User-to-User Interface,
 Client side) and UNI-N (User-to-Network Interface, Network side), in
 order to show their relationship to one another.

Bocci, et al. Informational [Page 2] RFC 6215 MPLS-TP UNI and NNI April 2011

 This document provides updated illustrations of the MPLS-TP UNI and
 MPLS-TP NNI to show these additional details.  These illustrations
 obsolete the corresponding ones in [RFC5921].  This document also
 defines additional terminology referenced in the illustrations.  No
 other updates are made by this document.
 Awareness of the Transport Service layer need exist only at PE nodes,
 and so only these nodes are illustrated in the figures.  MPLS-TP
 Provider (P) nodes need have no awareness of this layer.  Both PE and
 P nodes participate in the Transport Path layer.  A PE terminates
 (i.e., is a Label Edge Router (LER) with respect to) the transport
 paths it supports, and is responsible for multiplexing and
 demultiplexing of Transport Service Instance traffic over such
 transport paths.

1.2. Terminology and Abbreviations

 The terminology and abbreviations of [RFC5921] apply.
 The following additional terminology is used in this document.
 Term  Definition
 ----- ---------------------------------------
 CP    Control Plane
 NNI   Network-to-Network Interface
 TSI   Transport Service Instance
 UNI   User-to-Network Interface
 UNI-C User-to-Network Interface, Client side
 UNI-N User-to-Network Interface, Network side
 Transport Service Instance:  A single logical point-to-point
    connection at the Transport Service layer between the ingress PE
    providing a packet transport service to a CE, and the
    corresponding egress PE to which the peer CE is attached.

2. MPLS-TP User-to-Network Interface

 The MPLS-TP User-to-Network Interface (UNI) is illustrated in
 Figure 1.  This figure obsoletes Figure 3 of [RFC5921].  Note that
 the term "MPLS-TP UNI" is to be interpreted as a UNI to an MPLS-TP
 network and does not refer to the protocol transiting the UNI.  The
 UNI for a particular client flow may involve signaling between the CE
 and PE.  If signaling is used, it may traverse the same attachment
 circuit that supports the client flow.

Bocci, et al. Informational [Page 3] RFC 6215 MPLS-TP UNI and NNI April 2011

                     UNI
                      :                             MPLS-TP
  :<-- UNI-C -->:     :     :<-- UNI-N ->:          Network <----->
  :  function   :     :     :  function  :
 ---------------      :      ------------:--------------------
  :             |     :     |            :   Transport        |
  :             |     V     |    Client  :     Path           |
  :             |           |   Service  :   Mux/Demux        |
  :             |           |   Control  :      --            |
  : ----------  |           |  ----------:     |  |  Transport|
  :|          | |           | |          |     |  |    Path   |
  :|Signaling |_|___________|_|Signaling |     |  |    --------->
  :|Controller| |           | |Controller|     |  |   |
  : ----------  |           |  ----------      |  |    --------->
  :      :......|...........|......:     :     |  |           |
  :             |  Control  |            :     |  |  Transport|
  :             |  Channel  |            :     |  |    Path   |
  :             |           |            :     |  |    --------->
  :             |           |            :     |  |  -+----------->TSI
  :             |           |  Transport :     |  | |  --------->
  :             |  Client   |   Service  :     |  | |         |
  :             |  Traffic  |  Data Plane:     |  | |         |
  : ----------  |  Flows    |  --------------  |  | |Transport|
  :| Client   |-|-----------|-|Client/Service|-|  |-   Path   |
  :| Traffic  |=|===========|=|    Traffic   | |  |    --------->
  :|Processing| |           | |  Processing  |=|  |===+===========>TSI
  : ----------  |           |  --------------  |  |    --------->
  :      |______|___________|______|     :     |  |           |
  :             | Data Link |            :     |  |           |
  :             |           |            :      --            |
  :             |           |            :          Transport |
  :             |           |            :             Path   |
  :             |           |            :          Data Plane|
 ---------------             ---------------------------------
 Customer Edge Node              MPLS-TP Provider Edge Node

Note: The client service control plane may be a control protocol

    belonging to the native service, or GMPLS.
           Figure 1: UNI between CE Node and MPLS-TP PE Node

Bocci, et al. Informational [Page 4] RFC 6215 MPLS-TP UNI and NNI April 2011

3. MPLS-TP Network-to-Network Interface

 The MPLS-TP Network-to-Network Interface (NNI) is illustrated in
 Figure 2.  This figure obsoletes Figure 5 of [RFC5921].  The NNI for
 a particular Transport Service Instance may involve signaling between
 the two PEs.  If signaling is used, it may traverse the same data-
 link that supports the service instance.
                                NNI
              :<--- NNI --->:    :     :<--- NNI ---->:
              :  Function   :    :     :   Function   :
  ---------------------------    :      --------------------------
 |            :  Transport   |   :     |   Transport  :           |
 |            :  Service CP  |   V     |   Service CP :           |
 |            :  ----------  |Signaling|  ----------  :           |
 |            : |Signaling |_| _______ |_|Signaling | :           |
 |            : |Controller| |         | |Controller| :           |
 |            :  ----------  |         |  ----------  :           |
 |            :       :....... Control .......:       :           |
 |            :              | Channel |              :           |
 |   -        :   Transport  |         | Transport    :        -  |
 |  | |       :     Path CP  |         |  Path CP     :       | | |
 |  | |       :  ----------  |Signaling|  ----------  :       | | |

—–| | : |Signaling |_| ___ |_|Signaling | : | |—– —+-| | : |Controller| | | |Controller| : | |-+— —–| | : ———- | | ———- : | |—–

 |  | |       :       :....... Control .......:       :       | | |
 |  | |       :              | Channel |              :       | | |
 |  | |  Transport Path      |         |       Transport Path | | |
 |  | | /  mux/demux   \     |         |      /  mux/demux   \| | |
 |  | |/      :         \--  |         |  -- /        :       | | |
 |  | |   ----------    |  | |Transport| |  |    ----------   | | |
 |  | |--|Transport |---|  | |  Path   | |  |---|Transport |--| | |

—–| | | Service | | |————-| | | Service | | |—– TSI+=| |==|Processing|===| |<+===TSI===+>| |===|Processing|==| |=+TSI —–| | ———- | |————-| | ———- | |—–

 |  | |       :         |  | |         | |  |         :       | | |
 |  | |       :         |  | |         | |  |         :       | | |
 |   -        :          --  |         |  --          :        -  |
 |            :              |         |              :           |
 |     Transport Path        |         |      Transport Path      |
 |       Data Plane                    |        Data Plane        |
  ---------------------------           --------------------------
       MPLS-TP Provider                        MPLS-TP Provider
         Edge Node A                             Edge Node B
                Figure 2: NNI between MPLS-TP PE Nodes

Bocci, et al. Informational [Page 5] RFC 6215 MPLS-TP UNI and NNI April 2011

4. Security Considerations

 The security considerations of [RFC5921] apply.  The updated
 reference models provided by this document introduce no new security
 considerations.

5. Acknowledgements

 The editors wish to thank the following for their contribution to
 this document:
 o  Eve Varma
 o  Dieter Beller
 o  Lou Berger
 o  Stewart Bryant
 o  Italo Busi
 o  The experts of ITU-T Study Group 15 and the IETF MPLS and PWE3
    working groups.

6. Normative References

 [RFC5921]  Bocci, M., Bryant, S., Frost, D., Levrau, L., and L.
            Berger, "A Framework for MPLS in Transport Networks",
            RFC 5921, July 2010.

Authors' Addresses

 Matthew Bocci
 Alcatel-Lucent
 EMail: matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com
 Lieven Levrau
 Alcatel-Lucent
 EMail: lieven.levrau@alcatel-lucent.com
 Dan Frost
 Cisco
 EMail: danfrost@cisco.com

Bocci, et al. Informational [Page 6]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc6215.txt · Last modified: 2011/04/11 19:06 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki