rfc:rfc6062
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Perreault, Ed. Request for Comments: 6062 Viagenie Category: Standards Track J. Rosenberg ISSN: 2070-1721 jdrosen.net
November 2010
Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Extensions for TCP Allocations
Abstract
This specification defines an extension of Traversal Using Relays
around NAT (TURN), a relay protocol for Network Address Translator
(NAT) traversal. This extension allows a TURN client to request TCP
allocations, and defines new requests and indications for the TURN
server to open and accept TCP connections with the client's peers.
TURN and this extension both purposefully restrict the ways in which
the relayed address can be used. In particular, it prevents users
from running general-purpose servers from ports obtained from the
TURN server.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6062.
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Overview of Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Client Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. Creating an Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.2. Refreshing an Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.3. Initiating a Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.4. Receiving a Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.5. Sending and Receiving Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.6. Data Connection Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5. TURN Server Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.1. Receiving a TCP Allocate Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.2. Receiving a Connect Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5.3. Receiving a TCP Connection on a Relayed Transport Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.4. Receiving a ConnectionBind Request . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.5. Data Connection Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6.1. New STUN Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6.2. New STUN Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6.2.1. CONNECTION-ID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6.3. New STUN Error Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
1. Introduction
Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) [RFC5766] is an extension to the Session Traversal Utilities for NAT [RFC5389] protocol. TURN allows for clients to communicate with a TURN server and ask it to allocate ports on one of its host interfaces, and then relay traffic between that port and the client itself. TURN, when used in concert with STUN and Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) [RFC5245], forms a solution for NAT traversal for UDP-based media sessions.
However, TURN itself does not provide a way for a client to allocate a TCP-based port on a TURN server. Such an allocation is needed for cases where a TCP-based session is desired with a peer, and NATs prevent a direct TCP connection. Examples include application sharing between desktop softphones, or transmission of pictures during a voice communications session.
This document defines an extension to TURN that allows a client to obtain a TCP allocation. It also allows the client to initiate outgoing TCP connections from that allocation to peers and to accept incoming TCP connection requests from peers made towards that allocation.
The term "TCP allocation" means a TURN allocation where TCP is used as the transport protocol instead of UDP. Such an allocation is uniquely identified by its relayed transport address, which consists of an IP address and TCP port (defined in [RFC5766]).
2. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
3. Overview of Operation
+--------+
| |
| Peer1 |
/ | |
/ | |
/ +--------+
/
/
/ Peer Data 1
/
+--------+ Control +--------+ /
| | -------------- | | /
| Client | Client Data 1 | TURN |
| | -------------- | Server | \
| | -------------- | | \
+--------+ Client Data 2 +--------+ \
\
\
\ +--------+
\ | |
Peer Data 2 \ | Peer2 |
\ | |
| |
+--------+
Figure 1: TURN TCP Model
The overall model for TURN-TCP is shown in Figure 1. The client will have two different types of connections to its TURN server. For each allocated relayed transport address, it will have a single control connection. Control connections are used to obtain allocations and open up new connections. Furthermore, for each connection to a peer, the client will have a single connection to its TURN server. These connections are called data connections. Consequently, there is a data connection from the client to its TURN server (the client data connection) and one from the TURN server to a peer (the peer data connection). Actual application data is sent on these connections. Indeed, after an initial TURN message that binds the client data connection to a peer data connection, only application data can be sent -- no TURN messaging. This is in contrast to the control connection, which only allows TURN messages and not application data.
To obtain a TCP-based allocation, a client first opens a TCP or TLS connection to its TURN server. The client then sends an Allocate request over that control connection. That request contains a REQUESTED-TRANSPORT attribute, which indicates a TCP-based allocation
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
is desired. A server that supports this extension will allocate a TCP relayed transport address and begin listening for connection requests on it. It then returns the allocated relayed transport address to the client in the response to the Allocate request. The connection on which the Allocate request was sent is the control connection.
If a client wishes to establish a TCP connection to a peer from that relayed transport address, it issues a Connect request to the TURN server over the control connection. That request contains an XOR- PEER-ADDRESS attribute identifying the peer IP address and port (i.e., its "transport address") to which a connection is to be made. The TURN server attempts to open the TCP connection, and assuming it succeeds, then responds to the Connect request with a success response. The server also creates a connection identifier associated with this connection and passes that connection identifier back to the client in the success response. Note that a maximum of one connection to a given peer transport address can be established per allocation.
Note: Establishing a relayed connection from the client to a peer
is done in two steps. First, the allocation is created, and
second, the connection is established. Combining the two is not
desirable for NAT traversal. It is expected that, between the
first and second steps, the client will communicate off-band with
the peer (e.g., using ICE [RFC5245]) and tell it the relayed
transport address that the TURN server allocated and from which it
is about to initiate a connection. The peer can then "get ready":
open holes in its firewall, try to poke holes in a NAT, attempt a
TCP simultaneous open, etc.
In order to actually send data on the new connection or otherwise utilize it in any way, the client establishes a new TCP connection to its TURN server. Once established, it issues a ConnectionBind request to the server over this new connection. That request echoes back the connection identifier to the TURN server. The TURN server uses it to correlate the two connections. As a consequence, the TCP connection to the peer is associated with a TCP connection to the client one-to-one. The two connections are now data connections. At this point, if the server receives data from the peer, it forwards that data towards the client, without any kind of encapsulation. Any data received by the TURN server from the client over the client data connection is forwarded to the peer, again without encapsulation or framing of any kind. Once a connection has been bound using the ConnectionBind request, TURN messaging is no longer permitted on the connection.
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
In a similar way, when a peer opens a TCP connection towards the relayed transport address, the server checks if there is a permission in place for that peer. If there is none, the connection is closed. Permissions are created with the CreatePermission request sent over the control connection, just as for UDP TURN. If there is a permission in place, the TURN server sends to the client a ConnectionAttempt Indication over the control connection. That indication contains a connection identifier. Once again, the client initiates a separate TCP connection to its TURN server, and over that connection, issues a ConnectionBind request. Once received, the TURN server will begin relaying data back and forth. The server closes the peer data connection if no ConnectionBind request is received after a timeout.
If the client closes a client data connection, the corresponding peer data connection is closed. If the peer closes a peer data connection, the corresponding client data connection is closed. In this way, the status of the connection is directly known to the client.
The TURN server will relay the data between the client and peer data connections. End-to-end flow control is maintained by the relay process: if the relay process is no longer able to write data to the destination of the relayed data, the relay process stops reading data from the source.
4. Client Processing
4.1. Creating an Allocation
To create a TCP allocation, a client MUST initiate a new TCP or TLS connection to its TURN server, identical to the TCP or TLS procedures defined in [RFC5766]. TCP allocations cannot be obtained using a UDP association between client and server.
Once set up, a client MUST send a TURN Allocate request. That request MUST contain a REQUESTED-TRANSPORT attribute whose value is 6, corresponding to TCP.
The request MUST NOT include a DONT-FRAGMENT, RESERVATION-TOKEN, or
EVEN-PORT attribute. The corresponding features are specific to UDP-
based capabilities and are not utilized by TURN-TCP. However, a
LIFETIME attribute MAY be included, with semantics identical to the
UDP case.
The procedures for authentication of the Allocate request and
processing of success and failure responses are identical to those
for UDP.
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
Once a success response is received, the TCP connection to the TURN server is called the control connection for that allocation.
4.2. Refreshing an Allocation
The procedures for refreshing an allocation are identical to those for UDP. Note that the Refresh MUST be sent on the control connection.
4.3. Initiating a Connection
To initiate a TCP connection to a peer, a client MUST send a Connect request over the control connection for the desired allocation. The Connect request MUST include an XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attribute containing the transport address of the peer to which a connection is desired.
If the connection is successfully established, the client will receive a success response. That response will contain a CONNECTION-ID attribute. The client MUST initiate a new TCP connection to the server, utilizing the same destination transport address to which the control connection was established. This connection MUST be made using a different local transport address. Authentication of the client by the server MUST use the same method and credentials as for the control connection. Once established, the client MUST send a ConnectionBind request over the new connection. That request MUST include the CONNECTION-ID attribute, echoed from the Connect Success response. When a response to the ConnectionBind request is received, if it is a success, the TCP connection on which it was sent is called the client data connection corresponding to the peer.
If the result of the Connect request was an Error Response, and the
response code was 447 (Connection Timeout or Failure), it means that
the TURN server was unable to connect to the peer. The client MAY
retry with the same XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attribute, but MUST wait at
least 10 seconds.
As with any other request, multiple Connect requests MAY be sent
simultaneously. However, Connect requests with the same XOR-PEER-
ADDRESS parameter MUST NOT be sent simultaneously.
4.4. Receiving a Connection
After an Allocate request is successfully processed by the server,
the client will start receiving a ConnectionAttempt indication each
time a peer for which a permission has been installed attempts a new
connection to the relayed transport address. This indication will
contain CONNECTION-ID and XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attributes. If the client
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
wishes to accept this connection, it MUST initiate a new TCP connection to the server, utilizing the same destination transport address to which the control connection was established. This connection MUST be made using a different local transport address. Authentication of the client by the server MUST use the same method and credentials as for the control connection. Once established, the client MUST send a ConnectionBind request over the new connection. That request MUST include the CONNECTION-ID attribute, echoed from the ConnectionAttempt indication. When a response to the ConnectionBind request is received, if it is a success, the TCP connection on which it was sent is called the client data connection corresponding to the peer.
4.5. Sending and Receiving Data
Once a client data connection is established, data sent on it by the client will be relayed as-is to the peer by the server. Similarly, data sent by the peer to the server will be relayed as-is to the client over the data connection.
4.6. Data Connection Maintenance
The client MUST refresh the allocation (corresponding to a data
connection) using the Refresh request as defined in [RFC5766] for as
long as it wants to keep the data connection alive.
When the client wishes to terminate its relayed connection to the peer, it closes the data connection to the server.
Note: No mechanism for keeping alive the NAT bindings (potentially
on the client data connection as well as on the peer data
connection) is included. This service is not provided by TURN-
TCP. If such a feature is deemed necessary, it can be implemented
higher up the stack, in the application protocol being tunneled
inside TURN-TCP. Also, TCP keep-alives MAY be used to keep the
NAT bindings on the client data connection alive.
5. TURN Server Behavior
5.1. Receiving a TCP Allocate Request
The process is similar to that defined in [RFC5766], Section 6.2, with the following exceptions:
1. If the REQUESTED-TRANSPORT attribute is included and specifies a
protocol other than UDP or TCP, the server MUST reject the
request with a 442 (Unsupported Transport Protocol) error. If
the value is UDP, and if UDP transport is allowed by local
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
policy, the server MUST continue with the procedures of [RFC5766]
instead of this document. If the value is UDP, and if UDP
transport is forbidden by local policy, the server MUST reject
the request with a 403 (Forbidden) error.
2. If the client connection transport is not TCP or TLS, the server
MUST reject the request with a 400 (Bad Request) error.
3. If the request contains the DONT-FRAGMENT, EVEN-PORT, or RESERVATION-TOKEN attribute, the server MUST reject the request with a 400 (Bad Request) error.
4. A TCP relayed transport address MUST be allocated instead of a
UDP one.
5. The RESERVATION-TOKEN attribute MUST NOT be present in the
success response.
If all checks pass, the server MUST start accepting incoming TCP connections on the relayed transport address. Refer to Section 5.3 for details.
5.2. Receiving a Connect Request
When the server receives a Connect request, it processes the request as follows.
If the request is received on a TCP connection for which no
allocation exists, the server MUST return a 437 (Allocation Mismatch)
error.
If the server is currently processing a Connect request for this
allocation with the same XOR-PEER-ADDRESS, it MUST return a 446
(Connection Already Exists) error.
If the server has already successfully processed a Connect request
for this allocation with the same XOR-PEER-ADDRESS, and the resulting
client and peer data connections are either pending or active, it
MUST return a 446 (Connection Already Exists) error.
If the request does not contain an XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attribute, or if such attribute is invalid, the server MUST return a 400 (Bad Request) error.
If the new connection is forbidden by local policy, the server MUST
reject the request with a 403 (Forbidden) error.
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
Otherwise, the server MUST initiate an outgoing TCP connection. The local endpoint is the relayed transport address associated with the allocation. The remote endpoint is the one indicated by the XOR- PEER-ADDRESS attribute. If the connection attempt fails or times out, the server MUST return a 447 (Connection Timeout or Failure) error. The timeout value MUST be at least 30 seconds.
If the connection is successful, it is now called a peer data connection. The server MUST buffer any data received from the client. The server adjusts its advertised TCP receive window to reflect the amount of empty buffer space.
The server MUST include the CONNECTION-ID attribute in the Connect success response. The attribute's value MUST uniquely identify the peer data connection.
If no ConnectionBind request associated with this peer data
connection is received after 30 seconds, the peer data connection
MUST be closed.
5.3. Receiving a TCP Connection on a Relayed Transport Address
When a server receives an incoming TCP connection on a relayed
transport address, it processes the request as follows.
The server MUST accept the connection. If it is not successful, nothing is sent to the client over the control connection.
If the connection is successfully accepted, it is now called a peer data connection. The server MUST buffer any data received from the peer. The server adjusts its advertised TCP receive window to reflect the amount of empty buffer space.
If no permission for this peer has been installed for this allocation, the server MUST close the connection with the peer immediately after it has been accepted.
Otherwise, the server sends a ConnectionAttempt indication to the client over the control connection. The indication MUST include an XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attribute containing the peer's transport address, as well as a CONNECTION-ID attribute uniquely identifying the peer data connection.
If no ConnectionBind request associated with this peer data
connection is received after 30 seconds, the peer data connection
MUST be closed.
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 10] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
5.4. Receiving a ConnectionBind Request
When a server receives a ConnectionBind request, it processes the request as follows.
If the client connection transport is not TCP or TLS, the server MUST
return a 400 (Bad Request) error.
If the request does not contain the CONNECTION-ID attribute, or if this attribute does not refer to an existing pending connection, the server MUST return a 400 (Bad Request) error.
Otherwise, the client connection is now called a client data connection. Data received on it MUST be sent as-is to the associated peer data connection.
Data received on the associated peer data connection MUST be sent as-is on this client data connection. This includes data that was received after the associated Connect or request was successfully processed and before this ConnectionBind request was received.
5.5. Data Connection Maintenance
If the allocation associated with a data connection expires, the data connection MUST be closed.
When a client data connection is closed, the server MUST close the corresponding peer data connection.
When a peer data connection is closed, the server MUST close the corresponding client data connection.
6. IANA Considerations
This specification defines several new STUN methods, STUN attributes, and STUN error codes. IANA added these new protocol elements to the Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Parameters registry.
6.1. New STUN Methods
This section lists the codepoints for the new STUN methods defined in this specification. See Sections 4 and 5 for the semantics of these new methods.
0x000a : Connect 0x000b : ConnectionBind 0x000c : ConnectionAttempt
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 11] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
6.2. New STUN Attributes
This STUN extension defines the following new attributes:
0x002a : CONNECTION-ID
6.2.1. CONNECTION-ID
The CONNECTION-ID attribute uniquely identifies a peer data connection. It is a 32-bit unsigned integral value.
6.3. New STUN Error Codes
446 Connection Already Exists 447 Connection Timeout or Failure
7. Security Considerations
After a TCP connection is established between the server and a peer,
and before a ConnectionBind request is received from the client, the
server buffers all data received from the peer. This protocol
specification lets the server drop the connection if the buffer size
is about to exceed a limit defined by local policy. This policy
should ensure that memory resources are not exceeded. See also
[RFC4732], Section 2.1.3.
All the security considerations applicable to STUN [RFC5389] and TURN [RFC5766] are applicable to this document as well.
8. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Rohan Mahy and Philip Matthews for their initial work on getting this document started.
The authors would also like to thank Alfred E. Heggestad, Ari Keranen, Marc Petit-Huguenin, Dave Thaler, and Dan Wing for their comments and suggestions.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC5389] Rosenberg, J., Mahy, R., Matthews, P., and D. Wing,
"Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", RFC 5389,
October 2008.
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 6062 TURN TCP November 2010
[RFC5766] Mahy, R., Matthews, P., and J. Rosenberg, "Traversal Using
Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session
Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", RFC 5766, April 2010.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC4732] Handley, M., Rescorla, E., and IAB, "Internet Denial-of-
Service Considerations", RFC 4732, December 2006.
[RFC5245] Rosenberg, J., "Interactive Connectivity Establishment
(ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT)
Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols", RFC 5245,
April 2010.
Authors' Addresses
Simon Perreault (editor) Viagenie 2875 boul. Laurier, suite D2-630 Quebec, QC G1V 2M2 Canada
Phone: +1 418 656 9254 EMail: simon.perreault@viagenie.ca URI: http://www.viagenie.ca
Jonathan Rosenberg jdrosen.net Monmouth, NJ US
EMail: jdrosen@jdrosen.net URI: http://www.jdrosen.net
Perreault & Rosenberg Standards Track [Page 13]
/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc6062.txt · Last modified: 2010/11/30 06:02 by 127.0.0.1