GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc5745

Network Working Group A. Malis, Ed. Request for Comments: 5745 For the IAB Updates: 4846 December 2009 Category: Informational

        Procedures for Rights Handling in the RFC IAB Stream

Abstract

This document specifies the procedures by which authors of RFC IAB stream documents grant the community "incoming" rights for copying and using the text. It also specifies the "outgoing" rights the community grants to readers and users of those documents, and it requests that the IETF Trust manage the outgoing rights to effect this result.

Status of This Memo

 This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
 not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
 memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the BSD License.

Malis Informational [Page 1] RFC 5745 Rights for the IAB Stream December 2009

Table of Contents

 1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 2.  Background  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 3.  Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 4.  Rules for Submission and Use of Material  . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 5.  Procedures Requested of the IETF Trust  . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 6.  Patent and Trademark Rules for the IAB Stream . . . . . . . . . 4
 7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
 8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
 10. IAB Members at the Time of This Writing . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

1. Introduction

 As the IETF has grown, the process and the community have become more
 careful about defining the rights relating to copying documents that
 are granted by authors to the community, and the corresponding rights
 that are granted by the community to readers and users of these
 documents.  The creation of the IETF Trust [RFC4371], with its
 special role in managing intellectual property rights (IPR), has also
 increased the need to be explicit about these rights and decisions.
 This document defines the copyright procedures for RFC IAB stream
 documents.  It parallels the procedures for IETF-produced documents
 defined in RFC 5377 [RFC5377] and RFC 5378 [RFC5378].
 In summary, submissions in the IAB stream use the same submission
 procedures and mechanisms that are defined in RFC 5378, and hence
 require the same "incoming rights" as IETF-stream documents.  This
 document provides advice to the Trustees of the IETF Trust on
 "outgoing" rights to be granted to readers and users of IAB stream
 documents, and it explicitly requests the IETF Trust to manage the
 rights in accordance with this advice.
 This document also specifies the policies with regard to the
 disclosure of Patents and Trademarks that may be relevant to a
 submission intended for the IAB stream.

2. Background

 The concept of RFC streams in general, and the IAB stream in
 particular, is described in Section 5 of RFC 4844 [RFC4844].
 Section 8 of RFC 4846 [RFC4846] presented the copyright rules for the
 Independent Submission stream.  The present document is intended to

Malis Informational [Page 2] RFC 5745 Rights for the IAB Stream December 2009

 be fully consistent with that section, and to update it by clarifying
 the formal procedures that the IETF Trust will use to effect those
 rules.  In particular, it is the intention of this document to make
 the copyright rules for IAB stream documents identical to those for
 Independent Submission stream documents.

3. Goals

 The goal of the IAB stream of RFCs is to publish information from the
 IAB to the Internet community.  Consistent with the principle stated
 for the Independent Submission stream in Section 8 of RFC 4846, this
 objective will best be met with a liberal copyright policy on IAB
 stream documents.  Therefore, the IAB stream policy is to allow any
 individual reading such documents to use the content thereof in any
 manner.  The only restriction is that proper credit ("attribution")
 must be given.  Lawyers describe this liberal policy by saying that
 this stream normally permits "unlimited derivative works".  The only
 additional restriction for the use of IAB documents is that proper
 credit ("attribution") must be given.
 However, for a small subset of documents published as IAB stream
 documents, such as output from other standards bodies, it is not
 reasonable to permit unlimited derivative works.  In such cases,
 authors are permitted to request that the published IAB stream
 documents permit no derivative works.
 Note also that this unlimited derivative works policy applies to all
 parts of an IAB stream document, including any code.  Therefore, no
 separate licensing procedure is required for extracting and adapting
 code that is contained in an IAB stream document submitted under the
 (preferred) unlimited derivative works terms.  On the other hand,
 code may not be extracted and adapted from IAB stream documents
 submitted under the "no derivative works" terms.

4. Rules for Submission and Use of Material

 IAB stream authors will submit their material as Internet-Drafts.
 These drafts will be submitted to, and stored in, the IETF Internet-
 Drafts repository in the same fashion as IETF Internet-Drafts.
 During Internet-Draft submission, authors who intend to submit their
 document for publication in the IAB stream will grant rights as
 described in [RFC5378].  To request that the contribution be
 published as an RFC that permits no derivative works, an author may
 use the form specified for use with RFC 5378.
 The IETF Trust will publish rules that provide that the Trust grants
 to readers and users of material from IAB stream RFCs the right to

Malis Informational [Page 3] RFC 5745 Rights for the IAB Stream December 2009

 make unlimited derivative works, unless the RFC specifies that no
 derivative works are permitted.  This will permit anyone to copy,
 extract, modify, or otherwise use material from IAB stream RFCs as
 long as suitable attribution is given.
 Contributors of Internet-Drafts intended for the IAB stream will
 include the appropriate boilerplate defined by the IETF Trust.  This
 boilerplate shall indicate compliance with RFC 5378 and shall
 explicitly indicate either that no derivative works can be based on
 the contribution, or, as is preferred, that unlimited derivative
 works may be crafted from the contribution.

5. Procedures Requested of the IETF Trust

 The IAB requests that the IETF Trust and its Trustees assist in
 meeting the goals and procedures set forth in this document.
 The Trustees are requested to publicly confirm their willingness and
 ability to accept responsibility for the Intellectual Property Rights
 for the IAB stream.
 Specifically, the Trustees are asked to develop the necessary
 boilerplate to enable the suitable marking of documents so that the
 IETF Trust receives the rights as specified in RFC 5378.  These
 procedures need to also allow authors to indicate either no rights to
 make derivative works, or preferentially, the right to make unlimited
 derivative works from the documents.  It is left to the Trust to
 specify exactly how this shall be clearly indicated in each document.

6. Patent and Trademark Rules for the IAB Stream

 As specified above, contributors of documents for the IAB stream are
 expected to use the IETF Internet-Draft process, complying therein
 with the rules specified in the latest version of BCP 9, whose
 version at the time of writing was [RFC2026].  This includes the
 disclosure of Patent and Trademark issues that are known, or can be
 reasonably expected to be known, to the contributor.
 Disclosure of license terms for patents is also requested, as
 specified in the most recent version of BCP 79.  The version of BCP
 79 at the time of this writing was [RFC3979], updated by [RFC4879].
 The IAB stream has chosen to use the IETF's IPR disclosure mechanism,
 www.ietf.org/ipr/, for this purpose.  The IAB would prefer the most
 liberal terms possible be made available for IAB stream documents.
 Terms that do not require fees or licensing are preferable.  Non-
 discriminatory terms are strongly preferred over those that
 discriminate among users.  However, although disclosure is required
 and the IAB may consider disclosures and terms in making a decision

Malis Informational [Page 4] RFC 5745 Rights for the IAB Stream December 2009

 as to whether to submit a document for publication, there are no
 specific requirements on the licensing terms for intellectual
 property related to IAB stream publication.

7. Security Considerations

 The integrity and quality of the IAB stream are the responsibility of
 the IAB.  This document does not change those responsibilities.

8. References

8.1. Normative References

 [RFC2026]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
            3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
 [RFC3979]  Bradner, S., Ed., "Intellectual Property Rights in IETF
            Technology", BCP 79, RFC 3979, March 2005.
 [RFC4371]   Carpenter, B., Ed., and L. Lynch, Ed., "BCP 101 Update
            for IPR Trust", BCP 101, RFC 4371, January 2006.
 [RFC4844]  Daigle, L., Ed., and Internet Architecture Board, "The RFC
            Series and RFC Editor", RFC 4844, July 2007.
 [RFC4846]  Klensin, J., Ed., and D. Thaler, Ed., "Independent
            Submissions to the RFC Editor", RFC 4846, July 2007.
 [RFC4879]  Narten, T., "Clarification of the Third Party Disclosure
            Procedure in RFC 3979", BCP 79, RFC 4879, April 2007.
 [RFC5378]  Bradner, S., Ed., and J. Contreras, Ed., "Rights
            Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust", BCP 78, RFC 5378,
            November 2008.

8.2. Informative References

 [RFC5377]  Halpern, J., Ed., "Advice to the Trustees of the IETF
            Trust on Rights to Be Granted in IETF Documents", RFC
            5377, November 2008.
 [RFC5744]  Braden, R. and J. Halpern, "Procedures for Rights Handling
            in the RFC Independent Submission Stream", RFC 5744,
            December 2009.

Malis Informational [Page 5] RFC 5745 Rights for the IAB Stream December 2009

9. Acknowledgements

 The author wishes to acknowledge that the majority of text of this
 document was derived from [RFC5744], and wishes to thank the authors
 of that document.

10. IAB Members at the Time of This Writing

 Marcelo Bagnulo
 Gonzalo Camarillo
 Stuart Cheshire
 Vijay Gill
 Russ Housley
 John Klensin
 Olaf Kolkman
 Gregory Lebovitz
 Andrew Malis
 Danny McPherson
 David Oran
 Jon Peterson
 Dave Thaler

Author's Address

 Andrew G. Malis
 Verizon Communications
 117 West St.
 Waltham, MA 02451
 USA
 EMail: andrew.g.malis@verizon.com
 IAB
 EMail: iab@iab.org

Malis Informational [Page 6]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc5745.txt · Last modified: 2009/12/21 19:51 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki