GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc5526

Network Working Group J. Livingood Request for Comments: 5526 Comcast Cable Communications Category: Informational P. Pfautz

                                                                  AT&T
                                                            R. Stastny
                                                          Unaffiliated
                                                            April 2009
          The E.164 to Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI)
      Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Application
                      for Infrastructure ENUM

Status of This Memo

 This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
 not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
 memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
 publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
 Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
 and restrictions with respect to this document.
 This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
 Contributions published or made publicly available before November
 10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
 material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
 modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
 Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
 the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
 outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
 not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
 it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
 than English.

Livingood, et al. Informational [Page 1] RFC 5526 Infrastructure ENUM April 2009

Abstract

 This document defines the use case for Infrastructure ENUM and
 proposes its implementation as a parallel namespace to "e164.arpa",
 as defined in RFC 3761, as the long-term solution to the problem of
 allowing carriers to provision DNS records for telephone numbers
 independently of those provisioned by end users (number assignees).

Table of Contents

 1. Introduction ....................................................2
 2. Terminology .....................................................3
 3. Zone Apex for Infrastructure ENUM ...............................3
 4. IANA Considerations .............................................3
 5. Security and Privacy Considerations .............................4
 6. Acknowledgements ................................................4
 7. Normative References ............................................4

1. Introduction

 ENUM (E.164 Number Mapping [1]) is a system that transforms E.164
 numbers [2] into domain names and then uses the DNS (Domain Name
 Service) [3] to discover NAPTR records that specify what services are
 available for a specific domain name.
 ENUM as originally defined was based on the end-user opt-in
 principle.  While this has great potential to foster new services and
 end-user choices in the long term, the current requirements for
 IP-based interconnection of Voice over IP (VoIP) domains require the
 provisioning of large numbers of allocated or served (hosted) numbers
 of a participating service provider, without the need for individual
 users to opt-in.  This way, service providers can provision their own
 ENUM information that is separate, distinct, and likely to be
 different from what an end-user may provision.  This is particularly
 important if Infrastructure ENUM is used for number-portability
 applications, for example, which an end-user would be unlikely
 interested in provisioning but which a service provider would likely
 find essential.
 In addition, while it is possible that service providers could
 mandate that their users opt-into e164.arpa through end-user contract
 terms and conditions, there are substantial downsides to such an
 approach.  Thus, for all these reasons and many others, ENUM for
 end-user provisioning is ill-suited for use by service providers for
 the interconnection of VoIP domains.

Livingood, et al. Informational [Page 2] RFC 5526 Infrastructure ENUM April 2009

 As VoIP evolves and becomes pervasive, E.164-addressed telephone
 calls need not necessarily traverse the Public Switched Telephone
 Network (PSTN).  Therefore, VoIP service providers have an interest
 in using ENUM on a so-called "Infrastructure" basis in order to keep
 VoIP traffic on IP networks on an end-to-end basis, both within and
 between service provider domains.  This requires a means of
 identifying a VoIP point of interconnection to which calls addressed
 to a given E.164 number may be delivered; Infrastructure ENUM
 provides this means.  Calls that can originate and terminate on IP
 networks, and do not have to traverse the PSTN, will require fewer or
 no points of transcoding, and can also involve additional IP network
 services that are not possible on the PSTN, among other benefits.
 Requirements for Infrastructure ENUM are provided in [4].

2. Terminology

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [5].

3. Zone Apex for Infrastructure ENUM

 This document proposes that Infrastructure ENUM be implemented by
 means of a parallel namespace to e164.arpa dedicated to
 Infrastructure ENUM, in a domain that is yet to be determined.  Use
 of a parallel namespace allows carriers and end-users to control
 their ENUM registrations independently, without forcing one to work
 through the other.
 Infrastructure ENUM Tier 2 resource records in the Infrastructure
 ENUM tree will be controlled by the service provider that is
 providing services to a given E.164 number, generally referred to in
 various countries as the "carrier-of-record" (see [4]).  The
 definition of a carrier-of-record for a given E.164 number is a
 national matter or is defined by the entity controlling the numbering
 space.
 See also Section 3, "Requirements for Infrastructure ENUM", of [4].

4. IANA Considerations

 IANA has created a registry for Enumservices as originally specified
 in RFC 2916 and revised in RFC 3761.  Enumservices registered with
 IANA are valid for Infrastructure ENUM as well as end-user ENUM.

Livingood, et al. Informational [Page 3] RFC 5526 Infrastructure ENUM April 2009

5. Security and Privacy Considerations

 This document proposes a new zone apex for ENUM to meet the
 requirements of Infrastructure ENUM.  The over-the-network protocol
 of ENUM is unchanged by the addition of an apex and, as such, the
 Security Considerations of RFC 3761 [1] still apply.  Specific
 considerations related to the security of an Infrastructure ENUM apex
 are given in more detail in Section 4, "Security Considerations", of
 [4].
 Infrastructure ENUM registrations proposed by this document should
 resolve to service provider points-of-interconnection rather than to
 end-user equipment.  Service providers need to take appropriate
 measures to protect their end-user customers from unwanted
 communications as with other types of interconnections.

6. Acknowledgements

 The authors wish to thank Lawrence Conroy, Patrik Faltstrom, Michael
 Haberler, Otmar Lendl, Steve Lind, Alexander Mayrhofer, Jim Reid, and
 Richard Shockey for their helpful discussions of this document and
 the concept of Infrastructure ENUM.

7. Normative References

 [1] Faltstrom, P. and M. Mealling, "The E.164 to Uniform Resource
     Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS)
     Application (ENUM)", RFC 3761, April 2004.
 [2] ITU-T, "The International Public Telecommunication Number Plan",
     Recommendation E.164, February 2005.
 [3] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD
     13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
 [4] Lind, S. and P. Pfautz, "Infrastructure ENUM Requirements", RFC
     5067, November 2007.
 [5] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
     Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

Livingood, et al. Informational [Page 4] RFC 5526 Infrastructure ENUM April 2009

Authors' Addresses

 Jason Livingood
 Comcast Cable Communications
 1500 Market Street
 Philadelphia, PA 19102
 USA
 Phone: +1-215-981-7813
 EMail: jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com
 Penn Pfautz
 AT&T
 200 S. Laurel Ave
 Middletown, NJ  07748
 USA
 Phone: +1-732-420-4962
 EMail: ppfautz@att.com
 Richard Stastny
 Anzbachgasse 43
 1140 Vienna
 Austria
 Phone: +43-664-420-4100
 EMail: richard.stastny@gmail.com

Livingood, et al. Informational [Page 5]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc5526.txt · Last modified: 2009/04/21 23:04 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki