GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc5179

Network Working Group N. Williams Request for Comments: 5179 Sun Category: Standards Track May 2008

  Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSS-API)
Domain-Based Service Names Mapping for the Kerberos V GSS Mechanism

Status of This Memo

 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

 This document describes the mapping of Generic Security Service
 Application Program Interface (GSS-API) domain-name-based service
 principal names onto Kerberos V principal names.

Table of Contents

 1.  Domain-Based Names for the Kerberos V GSS-API Mechanism . . . . 2
 2.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 3.  Internationalization Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 4.  Examples  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 6.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Williams Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 5179 Kerberos Domain-Based Names May 2008

1. Domain-Based Names for the Kerberos V GSS-API Mechanism

 In accordance with [RFC5178], this document provides the mechanism-
 specific details needed to implement GSS-API [RFC2743] domain-based
 service names with the Kerberos V GSS-API mechanism [RFC4121].
 GSS_C_NT_DOMAINBASED_SERVICE name SHOULD be mapped to Kerberos V
 principal names as follows:
 o  the <service> name becomes the first (0th) component of the
    Kerberos V principal name;
 o  the <hostname> becomes the second component of the Kerberos V
    principal name;
 o  the <domain> name becomes the third component of the Kerberos V
    principal name;
 o  the realm of the resulting principal name is that which
    corresponds to the domain name, treated as a hostname.
 The same name canonicalization considerations and methods as used
 elsewhere in the Kerberos V GSS-API mechanism [RFC4121] and Kerberos
 V [RFC4120] in general apply here.
 Implementations SHOULD use a Kerberos V name-type of
 NTT-SRVT-HST-DOMAIN (which has the value 12) but MAY use NT-UNKNOWN
 instead.

2. Conventions Used in This Document

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3. Internationalization Considerations

 It is unclear, at this time, how best to address internationalization
 of Kerberos V domain-based principal names.  This is because the
 Kerberos V core protocol internationalization project is incomplete.
 However, clearly the best way to interoperate when using Kerberos V
 domain-based principal names is to use ACE-encoded internationalized
 domain names [RFC3490] for the hostname and domain name slots of a
 Kerberos V domain-based principal name.  Therefore Kerberos V GSS-API
 mechanism implementations MUST do just that.

Williams Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 5179 Kerberos Domain-Based Names May 2008

4. Examples

 o  The domain-based name, of generic form,
    "ldap@foo.example@ds1.foo.example" may map to a Kerberos V
    principal name like: "ldap/ds1.foo.example/
    foo.example@FOO.EXAMPLE"
 o  The domain-based name, of generic form,
    "kadmin@foo.example@kdc1.foo.example" may map to a Kerberos V
    principal name like: "kadmin/kdc1.foo.example/
    foo.example@FOO.EXAMPLE"

5. Security Considerations

 See [RFC5178].
 It is important for the security of protocols using the Kerberos V
 GSS-API mechanism and domain-based names, that the realm of domain-
 based principal names be derived from the hostname, rather than the
 domain name slots of the input domain-based name string.

6. Normative References

 [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
            Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
 [RFC2743]  Linn, J., "Generic Security Service Application Program
            Interface Version 2, Update 1", RFC 2743, January 2000.
 [RFC3490]  Faltstrom, P., Hoffman, P., and A. Costello,
            "Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)",
            RFC 3490, March 2003.
 [RFC4120]  Neuman, C., Yu, T., Hartman, S., and K. Raeburn, "The
            Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)", RFC 4120,
            July 2005.
 [RFC4121]  Zhu, L., Jaganathan, K., and S. Hartman, "The Kerberos
            Version 5 Generic Security Service Application Program
            Interface (GSS-API) Mechanism: Version 2", RFC 4121,
            July 2005.
 [RFC5178]  Williams, N. and A. Melnikov, "Generic Security Service
            Application Program Interface (GSS-API)
            Internationalization and Domain-Based Service Names and
            Name Type", RFC 5178, May 2008.

Williams Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 5179 Kerberos Domain-Based Names May 2008

Author's Address

 Nicolas Williams
 Sun Microsystems
 5300 Riata Trace Ct.
 Austin, TX  78727
 US
 EMail: Nicolas.Williams@sun.com

Williams Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 5179 Kerberos Domain-Based Names May 2008

Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
 contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
 retain all their rights.
 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
 THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
 OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
 THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
 made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
 found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
 this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
 ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Williams Standards Track [Page 5]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc5179.txt · Last modified: 2008/05/09 20:46 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki