GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc5093

Network Working Group G. Hunt Request for Comments: 5093 BT Category: Informational December 2007

BT's eXtended Network Quality RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports
                           (RTCP XR XNQ)

Status of This Memo

 This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
 not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
 memo is unlimited.

IESG Note

 The IESG has concerns about vendor code points allocation in this
 small namespace and might not approve similar documents in the
 future.

Abstract

 This document describes an RTCP XR report block, which reports packet
 transport parameters.  The report block was developed by BT for pre-
 standards use in BT's next-generation network.  This document has
 been produced to describe the report block in sufficient detail to
 register the block type with IANA in accordance with the
 Specification Required policy of RFC 3611.  This specification does
 not standardise the new report block for use outside BT's network.

Table of Contents

 1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 2.  Requirements Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 3.  Extended Network Quality (XNQ) Report Block . . . . . . . . . . 2
 4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
 5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
 6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Hunt Informational [Page 1] RFC 5093 RTCP XR eXtended Network Quality December 2007

1. Introduction

 A set of metrics of packet-transport quality has been defined by BT
 for pre-standards use in its network.  These metrics are known as
 "XNQ" for "eXtended Network Quality".  This document defines an
 RTCP-XR Report Block to transport the XNQ measures from an RTP end
 system to its peer, using the extension mechanism defined in [1].
 The metrics are designed to supplement the packet-loss metric in RTCP
 [2] and the roundtrip delay measurement provided by RTCP.  They
 provide metrics for IP Packet Delay Variation based on the IPDV
 metric defined in [3], metrics reporting the activity of the RTP end
 system's receiver's jitter buffer, and metrics reporting "errored"
 and "severely errored" seconds.
 This document has been produced to describe the report block in
 sufficient detail to register the block type with IANA in accordance
 with the Specification Required policy of [1].  This specification
 does not standardise the new report block for use outside BT's
 network.
 Work in progress on RTCP HR [5] is likely to obsolete these metrics
 and the RTCP-XR Report Block defined here.

2. Requirements Notation

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in [4].

3. Extended Network Quality (XNQ) Report Block

 A set of metrics of packet-transport quality has been defined by BT
 for pre-standards use in its network.  These metrics are known as
 "XNQ" for "eXtended Network Quality".
 This document defines an RTCP-XR Report Block using the extension
 mechanism defined in [1].  The new Report Block provides transport of
 the XNQ measures from an RTP end system to its peer.
 The metrics are described in the following text.  However, some
 additional explanation is required for the metrics vmaxdiff, vrange,
 vsum, and c, which measure aspects of packet delay variation.  The
 metrics are based on the measure known as IP Packet Delay Variation
 (IPDV) defined in [3].  The IPDV of a packet is the amount by which
 the packet was delayed in the network, minus the amount a reference
 packet was delayed in the network.  The reference packet is usually
 the first packet of the connection.  IPDV is a signed quantity.

Hunt Informational [Page 2] RFC 5093 RTCP XR eXtended Network Quality December 2007

 The metric vrange is the difference (longest minus shortest) between
 the longest and shortest network packet delays seen over the duration
 of the connection to date.  The metric vrange is usually a positive
 quantity, but may be zero if the packet delay is exactly constant
 over the lifetime of the connection to date.
 The metric vmaxdiff is found as follows.  For each RTCP measurement
 cycle, find the difference (longest minus shortest) between the
 longest and shortest network packet delays within that measurement
 cycle.  These differences are usually all positive quantities, but a
 difference may be zero if the packet delay is exactly constant
 throughout the measurement cycle.  Take the set of these differences
 and find the maximum, which is vmaxdiff.  The metric vmaxdiff is also
 usually a positive quantity, but will be zero if all the members of
 the set of per-cycle differences are zero.
 The metric vsum is simply the sum of the per-RTCP-cycle differences,
 which were obtained to find vmaxdiff as described above.  The metric
 c is the number of per-RTCP-cycle differences, that is, the
 cardinality of the set of differences.  The two metrics vsum and c
 allow calculation of vsum/c, the average IPDV per RTCP measurement
 cycle.
 The format of the report is as shown in Figure 1.
   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |     BT=8      |   reserved    |      block length = 8         |
  +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
  |          begin_seq            |             end_seq           |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |           vmaxdiff            |             vrange            |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |                              vsum                             |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |               c               |            jbevents           |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |   reserved    |                     tdegnet                   |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |   reserved    |                     tdegjit                   |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |   reserved    |                        es                     |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |   reserved    |                       ses                     |
  +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
                               Figure 1

Hunt Informational [Page 3] RFC 5093 RTCP XR eXtended Network Quality December 2007

 The report consists of an RTCP-XR block header and a single 8-word
 sub-block.
 block type (BT): 8 bits
    An XNQ Metrics Report Block is identified by the constant 8.
 reserved: 8 bits
    These fields are reserved for future definition.  In the absence
    of such a definition, the bits in these fields MUST be set to zero
    and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
 block length: 16 bits
    Defined in Section 3 of [1].
 begin_seq: 16 bits
    As defined in Section 4.1 of [1].
 end_seq: 16 bits
    As defined in Section 4.1 of [1].
 vmaxdiff: 16 bits unsigned
    Largest IPDV difference seen to date within a single RTCP
    measurement cycle, measured in RTP timestamp units.  If the
    measured value exceeds 0xFFFE, the value 0xFFFF should be reported
    to indicate an over-range measurement.
 vrange: 16 bits unsigned
    Largest IPDV difference over the lifetime of the RTP flow to date,
    measured in RTP timestamp units.  If the measured value exceeds
    0xFFFE, the value 0xFFFF should be reported to indicate an over-
    range measurement.
 vsum: 32 bits unsigned
    Sum of the peak IPDV difference values within each RTCP cycle,
    summed over RTCP cycles over the lifetime of the RTP flow to date.
    If the measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFFFE, the value 0xFFFFFFFF
    should be reported to indicate an over-range measurement.

Hunt Informational [Page 4] RFC 5093 RTCP XR eXtended Network Quality December 2007

 c: 16 bits unsigned
    Number of RTCP cycles over which vsum was accumulated.  If the
    measured value exceeds 0xFFFE, the value 0xFFFF should be reported
    to indicate an over-range measurement.
 jbevents: 16 bits unsigned
    Cumulative number of jitter buffer adaptation events over the
    lifetime of the RTP flow to date.  If the measured value exceeds
    0xFFFE, the value 0xFFFF should be reported to indicate an over-
    range measurement.
 tdegnet: 24 bits unsigned
    The total time in sample periods affected either by packets
    unavailable due to network loss, or late delivery of packets,
    since the start of transmission.  If the measured value exceeds
    0xFFFFFE, the value 0xFFFFFF should be reported to indicate an
    over-range measurement.
 tdegjit: 24 bits unsigned
    The total time in sample periods degraded by jitter buffer
    adaptation events, e.g., where the jitter buffer either plays out
    a sample sequence not originating at the transmitter, repeats
    samples, or chooses not to play out a sample sequence that was
    sent by the transmitter.  If the measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFE,
    the value 0xFFFFFF should be reported to indicate an over-range
    measurement.
 es: 24 bits unsigned
    cumulative seconds affected by "unavailable packet" events over
    the lifetime of this ephemeral, to date.  If the measured value
    exceeds 0xFFFFFE, the value 0xFFFFFF should be reported to
    indicate an over-range measurement.
 ses: 24 bits unsigned
    cumulative seconds affected by severe "unavailable packet" events
    over the lifetime of this ephemeral, to date.  If the measured
    value exceeds 0xFFFFFE, the value 0xFFFFFF should be reported to
    indicate an over-range measurement.

Hunt Informational [Page 5] RFC 5093 RTCP XR eXtended Network Quality December 2007

4. IANA Considerations

 IANA has allocated the number 8 within the registry "RTP Control
 Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Block Types" to the RTCP XR
 report block described here.  This registry is defined in [1].

5. Security Considerations

 It is believed that this proposed RTCP XR report block introduces no
 new security considerations beyond those described in [1].  Some of
 the considerations in [1] do not apply to this report block.
 Specifically, XNQ does not provide per-packet statistics so the risk
 to confidentiality documented in Section 7, paragraph 3 of [1] does
 not apply, and XNQ packets cannot be very large so the risk of denial
 of service documented in Section 7, paragraph 7 of [1] does not
 apply.

6. References

6.1. Normative References

 [1]  Friedman, T., "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)",
      RFC 3611, November 2003.
 [2]  Schulzrinne, H., "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
      Applications", RFC 3550, July 2003.
 [3]  ITU-T, "Recommendation Y.1540, Internet protocol data
      communication service -- IP packet transfer and availability
      performance parameters", December 2002.
 [4]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
      Levels", RFC 2119, BCP 14, March 1997.

6.2. Informative References

 [5]  Clark, A., "RTCP HR - High Resolution VoIP Metrics Report
      Blocks", Work in Progress, November 2007.

Hunt Informational [Page 6] RFC 5093 RTCP XR eXtended Network Quality December 2007

Author's Address

 Geoff Hunt
 BT
 Orion 1 PP9
 Adastral Park
 Martlesham Heath
 Ipswich, Suffolk  IP5 3RE
 United Kingdom
 Phone: +44 1473 608325
 EMail: geoff.hunt@bt.com

Hunt Informational [Page 7] RFC 5093 RTCP XR eXtended Network Quality December 2007

Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
 contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
 retain all their rights.
 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
 THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
 OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
 THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
 made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
 found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
 this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
 ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Hunt Informational [Page 8]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc5093.txt · Last modified: 2007/12/13 02:30 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki