GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc4979

Network Working Group A. Mayrhofer Request for Comments: 4979 enum.at Category: Standards Track August 2007

              IANA Registration for Enumservice 'XMPP'

Status of This Memo

 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

Abstract

 This document requests IANA registration of an Enumservice for XMPP,
 the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol.  This Enumservice
 specifically allows the use of 'xmpp' Uniform Resource Identifiers
 (URIs) in the context of E.164 Number Mapping (ENUM).

Table of Contents

 1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 3.  Enumservice Registration - XMPP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 4.  XMPP IRI/URI Considerations for ENUM  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   4.1.  Authority Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   4.2.  IRI-to-URI mapping  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 5.  Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 6.  Security and Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 8.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 4979 XMPP Enumservice August 2007

1. Introduction

 E.164 Number Mapping (ENUM) [1] uses the Domain Name System (DNS) [6]
 to refer from E.164 numbers [7] to Uniform Resource Identifiers
 (URIs) [3].  Specific services to be used with ENUM must be
 registered with IANA.  Section 3 of RFC 3761 describes the process of
 such an Enumservice registration.
 The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) [9] provides
 means for streaming Extensible Markup Language (XML) [8] elements
 between endpoints in close to real time.  The XMPP framework is
 mainly used to provide instant messaging, presence, and streaming
 media services.
 RFC 4622 [5] registers a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) scheme for
 identifying an XMPP entity as a URI or as an Internationalized
 Resource Identifier (IRI) [4].  The Enumservice specified in this
 document allows the provisioning of such "xmpp" URIs (and the URI
 representations of "xmpp" IRIs) in ENUM.

2. Terminology

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [2].

3. Enumservice Registration - XMPP

 The following template contains information required for the IANA
 registrations of the 'XMPP' Enumservice, according to Section 3 of
 RFC 3761:
 Enumservice Name: "XMPP"
 Enumservice Type: "xmpp"
 Enumservice Subtype: n/a
 URI Schemes: "xmpp"
 Functional Specification:
    This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified is an XMPP
    entity.
 Security Considerations: see Section 6

Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 4979 XMPP Enumservice August 2007

 Intended Usage: COMMON
 Author: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at>

4. XMPP IRI/URI Considerations for ENUM

4.1. Authority Component

 XMPP IRIs/URIs optionally contain an "Authority Component" (see
 Section 2.3 of RFC 4622).  The presence of such an Authority
 Component in an IRI/URI signals the processing application to
 authenticate as the user indicated in the URI/IRI rather than using
 the preconfigured identity.
 In the context of this Enumservice, arbitrary clients may discover
 and use the XMPP URIs/IRIs associated to an E.164 number.  Hence, in
 most cases, those clients will not be able to authenticate as
 requested in the Authority Component.
 Therefore, URIs/IRIs that result from processing an XMPP Enumservice
 record SHOULD NOT contain an Authority Component.

4.2. IRI-to-URI mapping

 While XMPP supports IRIs as well as 'plain' URIs, ENUM itself
 supports only the use of URIs for Enumservices.
 Therefore, XMPP IRIs MUST be mapped to URIs for use in an XMPP
 Enumservice record.  The mapping MUST follow the procedures outlined
 in Section 3.1 of RFC 3987.

5. Example

 An example ENUM entry referencing to a XMPP URI could look like:
           $ORIGIN 6.9.4.0.6.9.4.5.1.1.4.4.e164.arpa.
           @  IN NAPTR  ( 100 10 "u"
                          "E2U+xmpp"
                          "!^.*$!xmpp:some-user@example.com!" .
                        )

Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 4979 XMPP Enumservice August 2007

6. Security and Privacy Considerations

 General security considerations of the protocols on which this
 Enumservice registration is based are addressed in Sections 3.1.3 and
 6 of RFC 3761 (ENUM) and Section 14 of RFC 3920 (XMPP).
 Since ENUM uses DNS -- a publicly available database -- any
 information contained in records provisioned in ENUM domains must be
 considered public as well.  Even after revoking the DNS entry and
 removing the referred resource, copies of the information could still
 be available.
 Information published in ENUM records could reveal associations
 between E.164 numbers and their owners -- especially if IRIs/URIs
 contain personal identifiers or domain names for which ownership
 information can be obtained easily.
 However, it is important to note that the ENUM record itself does not
 need to contain any personal information.  It just points to a
 location where access to personal information could be granted.
 ENUM records pointing to third-party resources can easily be
 provisioned on purpose by the ENUM domain owner -- so any assumption
 about the association between a number and an entity could therefore
 be completely bogus unless some kind of identity verification is in
 place.  This verification is out of scope for this memo.

7. IANA Considerations

 This memo requests IANA to add a new "XMPP" Enumservice to the
 'Enumservice Registrations' registry, according to the definitions in
 this document and RFC 3761 [1].
 The required template is contained in Section 3.

8. Acknowledgements

 Some text from RFC 4622 was used in the Introduction of this
 document.  Charles Clancy, Miguel Garcia, Andrew Newton, Jon
 Peterson, and Peter Saint-Andre provided extensive reviews and
 valuable feedback.

Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 4979 XMPP Enumservice August 2007

9. References

9.1. Normative References

 [1]  Faltstrom, P. and M. Mealling, "The E.164 to Uniform Resource
      Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS)
      Application (ENUM)", RFC 3761, April 2004.
 [2]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
      Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
 [3]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
      Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986,
      January 2005.
 [4]  Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource
      Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, January 2005.
 [5]  Saint-Andre, P., "Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)
      and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) for the Extensible
      Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)", RFC 4622, July 2006.

9.2. Informative References

 [6]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
      specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.
 [7]  ITU-T, "The international public telecommunication numbering
      plan", Recommendation E.164 (02/05), Feb. 2005.
 [8]  Maler, E., Paoli, J., Bray, T., Yergeau, F., and C. Sperberg-
      McQueen, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition)",
      World Wide Web Consortium FirstEdition REC-xml-20040204,
      February 2004, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204>.
 [9]  Saint-Andre, P., Ed., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
      Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 3920, October 2004.

Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 4979 XMPP Enumservice August 2007

Author's Address

 Alexander Mayrhofer
 enum.at GmbH
 Karlsplatz 1/2/9
 Wien  A-1010
 Austria
 Phone: +43 1 5056416 34
 EMail: alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at
 URI:   http://www.enum.at/

Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 4979 XMPP Enumservice August 2007

Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
 contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
 retain all their rights.
 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
 THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
 OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
 THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
 made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
 found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
 this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
 ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

 Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 Internet Society.

Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 7]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc4979.txt · Last modified: 2007/08/04 00:59 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki