GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc4735

Network Working Group T. Taylor Request for Comments: 4735 Nortel Category: Standards Track October 2006

            Example Media Types for Use in Documentation

Status of This Memo

 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

 This document is registration for the 'example' media type and
 'example' subtypes within the standards tree.  The 'example/*' and
 '*/example' media types are defined for documentation purposes only.

1. Introduction

 From time to time, documents created by the IETF or by other
 standards bodies show examples involving the use of media types,
 where the actual media type is not relevant.  It would be useful in
 such cases to be able to show a media type whose illustrative role in
 the example is clear.  In the worst case, this can be useful to debug
 implementations where the designer mistook the example for a
 requirement of the protocol concerned.
 To meet this need, this document registers the following media types:
 o  the 'example' media type;
 o  the 'application/example', 'audio/example', 'image/example',
    'message/example', 'model/example', 'multipart/example',
    'text/example', and 'video/example' media subtypes.
 It is suggested that compilers of illustrative examples involving
 media types in trees other than the standards tree might also
 incorporate the string "example" into their hypothetical media types.

Taylor Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006

2. Terminology

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3. Registration of the 'example' Media Type

 This section registers the 'example' media type in accordance with
 the requirements of RFC 4288.
 Type name: example.
 Subtype name: any subtype may be used with the 'example' type.
 However, IANA MUST NOT register any subtypes for the 'example' media
 type.
 Required parameters: as invented by the user.
 Optional parameters: as invented by the user.
 Encoding considerations: as invented by the user.
 Security considerations: The 'example' media type is defined for use
 in documentation only.  It MUST NOT be implemented.  Its appearance
 in real code could lead to unpredictable results and therefore open
 up security holes.
 Interoperability considerations: Any attempt to negotiate or send the
 'example' media type is bound to lead to interoperability problems.
 Published specification: this document.
 Applications that use this media type: as invented by the user.
 Additional information:
    Magic number(s): not applicable.
    File extension(s): not applicable.
    Macintosh file type code(s): not applicable.
 Person & email address to contact for further information:
 ietf-types@iana.org.
 Intended usage: LIMITED USE.

Taylor Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006

 Restrictions on usage: This type is intended only for use in
 documents providing examples involving specification of some media
 type, where the actual media type used is irrelevant.
 Author: Internet Engineering Task Force
 Change controller: Internet Engineering Task Force

4. Registration of the 'application/example', 'audio/example',

  'image/example', 'message/example', 'model/example',
  'multipart/example', 'text/example', and 'video/example' Subtypes
  This section registers 'example' media subtypes in accordance with
  the requirements of RFC 4288.
  Type name: 'application', 'audio', 'image', 'message', 'model',
  'multipart', 'text', and 'video'.
  Subtype name: 'example'.
  Required parameters: those required by the type and any others as
  invented by the user.
  Optional parameters: those offered by the type and any others as
  invented by the user.
  Encoding considerations: as invented by the user.
  Security considerations: The 'example' media subtypes are defined
  for use in documentation only.  They MUST NOT be implemented.  Their
  appearance in real code could lead to unpredictable results and
  therefore open up security holes.
  Interoperability considerations: Any attempt to negotiate or send
  one of these 'example' media subtypes is bound to lead to
  interoperability problems.
  Published specification: this document.
  Applications that use this media type: as invented by the user.
 Additional information:
    Magic number(s): not applicable.
    File extension(s): not applicable.
    Macintosh file type code(s): not applicable.
 Person & email address to contact for further information:
 ietf-types@iana.org.

Taylor Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006

 Intended usage: LIMITED USE.
 Restrictions on usage: These subtypes are intended only for use in
 documents providing examples involving specification of some subtype
 of the given media type, where the actual subtype used is irrelevant.
 Author: Internet Engineering Task Force
 Change controller: Internet Engineering Task Force

5. Security Considerations

 The 'example' media type and subtypes are defined for use in
 documentation only.  They MUST NOT be implemented.  Any attempt to
 implement them in real code could lead to unpredictable results and
 thus potentially open up security holes.

6. IANA Considerations

 This document specifies and registers the 'example' media type and
 the 'application/example', 'audio/example', 'image/example',
 'message/example', 'model/example', 'multipart/example',
 'text/example', and 'video/example' subtypes.

7. Acknowledgements

 This document sprang from Magnus Westerland's expression of need and
 Rod Walsh's support and suggestions for generalization.  Warnings
 against implementation in the Security Considerations and
 Interoperability Considerations sections and the 'multipart/example'
 subtype were added at John Klensin's suggestion.  Some editing
 touchups and strengthening of the language in the Security
 Considerations section were done in response to the Gen-ART reviewer,
 Sharon Chisholm.

8. Normative References

 [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
            Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
 [RFC4288]  Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
            Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.

Taylor Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006

Author's Address

 Tom Taylor
 Nortel
 1852 Lorraine Ave
 Ottawa, Ontario  K1H 6Z8
 Canada
 EMail: taylor@nortel.com

Taylor Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006

Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
 contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
 retain all their rights.
 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
 ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
 INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
 made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
 found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
 this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
 ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

 Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
 Administrative Support Activity (IASA).

Taylor Standards Track [Page 6]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc4735.txt · Last modified: 2006/10/26 00:17 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki