GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc3912

Network Working Group L. Daigle Request for Comments: 3912 VeriSign, Inc. Obsoletes: 954, 812 September 2004 Category: Standards Track

                    WHOIS Protocol Specification

Status of this Memo

 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).

Abstract

 This document updates the specification of the WHOIS protocol,
 thereby obsoleting RFC 954.  The update is intended to remove the
 material from RFC 954 that does not have to do with the on-the-wire
 protocol, and is no longer applicable in today's Internet.  This
 document does not attempt to change or update the protocol per se, or
 document other uses of the protocol that have come into existence
 since the publication of RFC 954.

1. Introduction

 WHOIS is a TCP-based transaction-oriented query/response protocol
 that is widely used to provide information services to Internet
 users.  While originally used to provide "white pages" services and
 information about registered domain names, current deployments cover
 a much broader range of information services.  The protocol delivers
 its content in a human-readable format.  This document updates the
 specification of the WHOIS protocol, thereby obsoleting RFC 954 [1].
 For historic reasons, WHOIS lacks many of the protocol design
 attributes, for example internationalisation and strong security,
 that would be expected from any recently-designed IETF protocol.
 This document does not attempt to rectify any of those shortcomings.
 Instead, this memo documents the WHOIS protocol as it is.  In some
 areas, this document does document particular well known shortcomings
 of the WHOIS protocol.  The discussion of possible protocols to carry
 out these functions, with updated capabilities to address the

Daigle Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 3912 WHOIS Protocol Specification September 2004

 shortcomings, is being addressed in a separate IETF activity (CRISP
 Working Group).

2. Protocol Specification

 A WHOIS server listens on TCP port 43 for requests from WHOIS
 clients.  The WHOIS client makes a text request to the WHOIS server,
 then the WHOIS server replies with text content.  All requests are
 terminated with ASCII CR and then ASCII LF.  The response might
 contain more than one line of text, so the presence of ASCII CR or
 ASCII LF characters does not indicate the end of the response.  The
 WHOIS server closes its connection as soon as the output is finished.
 The closed TCP connection is the indication to the client that the
 response has been received.

3. Protocol Example

 If one places a request of the WHOIS server located at whois.nic.mil
 for information about "Smith", the packets on the wire will look
 like:
 client                           server at whois.nic.mil
 open TCP   ---- (SYN) ------------------------------>
            <---- (SYN+ACK) -------------------------
 send query ---- "Smith<CR><LF>" -------------------->
 get answer <---- "Info about Smith<CR><LF>" ---------
            <---- "More info about Smith<CR><LF>" ----
 close      <---- (FIN) ------------------------------
            ----- (FIN) ----------------------------->

4. Internationalisation

 The WHOIS protocol has not been internationalised.  The WHOIS
 protocol has no mechanism for indicating the character set in use.
 Originally, the predominant text encoding in use was US-ASCII.  In
 practice, some WHOIS servers, particularly those outside the USA,
 might be using some other character set either for requests, replies,
 or both.  This inability to predict or express text encoding has
 adversely impacted the interoperability (and, therefore, usefulness)
 of the WHOIS protocol.

5. Security Considerations

 The WHOIS protocol has no provisions for strong security.  WHOIS
 lacks mechanisms for access control, integrity, and confidentiality.
 Accordingly, WHOIS-based services should only be used for information
 which is non-sensitive and intended to be accessible to everyone.

Daigle Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 3912 WHOIS Protocol Specification September 2004

 The absence of such security mechanisms means this protocol would not
 normally be acceptable to the IETF at the time of this writing.

6. Acknowledgements

 Ran Atkinson created an earlier version of this document.  Ken
 Harrenstien, Mary Stahl, and Elizabeth Feinler were the authors of
 the original Draft Standard for WHOIS.

7. References

7.1. Normative References

 [1]  Harrenstien, K., Stahl, M., and E. Feinler, "NICNAME/WHOIS", RFC
      954, October 1985.

Author's Address

 Leslie Daigle
 VeriSign, Inc.
 21355 Ridgetop Circle
 Dulles, VA  20166
 US
 EMail: leslie@verisignlabs.com; leslie@thinkingcat.com

Daigle Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 3912 WHOIS Protocol Specification September 2004

Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
 contained in BCP 78, and at www.rfc-editor.org, and except as set
 forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/S HE
 REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE
 INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
 IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
 THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
 made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
 on the ISOC's procedures with respect to rights in ISOC Documents can
 be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
 this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
 ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

 Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 Internet Society.

Daigle Standards Track [Page 4]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc3912.txt · Last modified: 2004/09/20 17:56 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki