GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc3411

Network Working Group D. Harrington Request for Comments: 3411 Enterasys Networks STD: 62 R. Presuhn Obsoletes: 2571 BMC Software, Inc. Category: Standards Track B. Wijnen

                                                   Lucent Technologies
                                                         December 2002
                   An Architecture for Describing
  Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks

Status of this Memo

 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

 This document describes an architecture for describing Simple Network
 Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks.  The architecture
 is designed to be modular to allow the evolution of the SNMP protocol
 standards over time.  The major portions of the architecture are an
 SNMP engine containing a Message Processing Subsystem, a Security
 Subsystem and an Access Control Subsystem, and possibly multiple SNMP
 applications which provide specific functional processing of
 management data.  This document obsoletes RFC 2571.

Table of Contents

 1. Introduction ................................................    4
 1.1. Overview ..................................................    4
 1.2. SNMP ......................................................    5
 1.3. Goals of this Architecture ................................    6
 1.4. Security Requirements of this Architecture ................    6
 1.5. Design Decisions ..........................................    8
 2. Documentation Overview ......................................   10
 2.1. Document Roadmap ..........................................   11
 2.2. Applicability Statement ...................................   11

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 2.3. Coexistence and Transition ................................   11
 2.4. Transport Mappings ........................................   12
 2.5. Message Processing ........................................   12
 2.6. Security ..................................................   12
 2.7. Access Control ............................................   13
 2.8. Protocol Operations .......................................   13
 2.9. Applications ..............................................   14
 2.10. Structure of Management Information ......................   15
 2.11. Textual Conventions ......................................   15
 2.12. Conformance Statements ...................................   15
 2.13. Management Information Base Modules ......................   15
 2.13.1. SNMP Instrumentation MIBs ..............................   15
 2.14. SNMP Framework Documents .................................   15
 3. Elements of the Architecture ................................   16
 3.1. The Naming of Entities ....................................   17
 3.1.1. SNMP engine .............................................   18
 3.1.1.1. snmpEngineID ..........................................   18
 3.1.1.2. Dispatcher ............................................   18
 3.1.1.3. Message Processing Subsystem ..........................   19
 3.1.1.3.1. Message Processing Model ............................   19
 3.1.1.4. Security Subsystem ....................................   20
 3.1.1.4.1. Security Model ......................................   20
 3.1.1.4.2. Security Protocol ...................................   20
 3.1.2. Access Control Subsystem ................................   21
 3.1.2.1. Access Control Model ..................................   21
 3.1.3. Applications ............................................   21
 3.1.3.1. SNMP Manager ..........................................   22
 3.1.3.2. SNMP Agent ............................................   23
 3.2. The Naming of Identities ..................................   25
 3.2.1. Principal ...............................................   25
 3.2.2. securityName ............................................   25
 3.2.3. Model-dependent security ID .............................   26
 3.3. The Naming of Management Information ......................   26
 3.3.1. An SNMP Context .........................................   28
 3.3.2. contextEngineID .........................................   28
 3.3.3. contextName .............................................   29
 3.3.4. scopedPDU ...............................................   29
 3.4. Other Constructs ..........................................   29
 3.4.1. maxSizeResponseScopedPDU ................................   29
 3.4.2. Local Configuration Datastore ...........................   29
 3.4.3. securityLevel ...........................................   29
 4. Abstract Service Interfaces .................................   30
 4.1. Dispatcher Primitives .....................................   30
 4.1.1. Generate Outgoing Request or Notification ...............   31
 4.1.2. Process Incoming Request or Notification PDU ............   31
 4.1.3. Generate Outgoing Response ..............................   32
 4.1.4. Process Incoming Response PDU ...........................   32
 4.1.5. Registering Responsibility for Handling SNMP PDUs .......   32

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 4.2. Message Processing Subsystem Primitives ...................   33
 4.2.1. Prepare Outgoing SNMP Request or Notification Message ...   33
 4.2.2. Prepare an Outgoing SNMP Response Message ...............   34
 4.2.3. Prepare Data Elements from an Incoming SNMP Message .....   35
 4.3. Access Control Subsystem Primitives .......................   35
 4.4. Security Subsystem Primitives .............................   36
 4.4.1. Generate a Request or Notification Message ..............   36
 4.4.2. Process Incoming Message ................................   36
 4.4.3. Generate a Response Message .............................   37
 4.5. Common Primitives .........................................   37
 4.5.1. Release State Reference Information .....................   37
 4.6. Scenario Diagrams .........................................   38
 4.6.1. Command Generator or Notification Originator ............   38
 4.6.2. Scenario Diagram for a Command Responder Application ....   39
 5. Managed Object Definitions for SNMP Management Frameworks ...   40
 6. IANA Considerations .........................................   51
 6.1. Security Models ...........................................   51
 6.2. Message Processing Models .................................   51
 6.3. SnmpEngineID Formats ......................................   52
 7. Intellectual Property .......................................   52
 8. Acknowledgements ............................................   52
 9. Security Considerations .....................................   54
 10. References .................................................   54
 10.1. Normative References .....................................   54
 10.2. Informative References ...................................   56
 A. Guidelines for Model Designers ..............................   57
 A.1. Security Model Design Requirements ........................   57
 A.1.1. Threats .................................................   57
 A.1.2. Security Processing .....................................   58
 A.1.3. Validate the security-stamp in a received message .......   59
 A.1.4. Security MIBs ...........................................   59
 A.1.5. Cached Security Data ....................................   59
 A.2. Message Processing Model Design Requirements ..............   60
 A.2.1. Receiving an SNMP Message from the Network ..............   60
 A.2.2. Sending an SNMP Message to the Network ..................   60
 A.3. Application Design Requirements ...........................   61
 A.3.1. Applications that Initiate Messages .....................   61
 A.3.2. Applications that Receive Responses .....................   62
 A.3.3. Applications that Receive Asynchronous Messages .........   62
 A.3.4. Applications that Send Responses ........................   62
 A.4. Access Control Model Design Requirements ..................   63
 Editors' Addresses .............................................   63
 Full Copyright Statement .......................................   64

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

1. Introduction

1.1. Overview

 This document defines a vocabulary for describing SNMP Management
 Frameworks, and an architecture for describing the major portions of
 SNMP Management Frameworks.
 This document does not provide a general introduction to SNMP.  Other
 documents and books can provide a much better introduction to SNMP.
 Nor does this document provide a history of SNMP.  That also can be
 found in books and other documents.
 Section 1 describes the purpose, goals, and design decisions of this
 architecture.
 Section 2 describes various types of documents which define (elements
 of) SNMP Frameworks, and how they fit into this architecture.  It
 also provides a minimal road map to the documents which have
 previously defined SNMP frameworks.
 Section 3 details the vocabulary of this architecture and its pieces.
 This section is important for understanding the remaining sections,
 and for understanding documents which are written to fit within this
 architecture.
 Section 4 describes the primitives used for the abstract service
 interfaces between the various subsystems, models and applications
 within this architecture.
 Section 5 defines a collection of managed objects used to instrument
 SNMP entities within this architecture.
 Sections 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 are administrative in nature.
 Appendix A contains guidelines for designers of Models which are
 expected to fit within this architecture.
 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

1.2. SNMP

 An SNMP management system contains:
  1. several (potentially many) nodes, each with an SNMP entity

containing command responder and notification originator

       applications, which have access to management instrumentation
       (traditionally called agents);
  1. at least one SNMP entity containing command generator and/or

notification receiver applications (traditionally called a

       manager) and,
  1. a management protocol, used to convey management information

between the SNMP entities.

 SNMP entities executing command generator and notification receiver
 applications monitor and control managed elements.  Managed elements
 are devices such as hosts, routers, terminal servers, etc., which are
 monitored and controlled via access to their management information.
 It is the purpose of this document to define an architecture which
 can evolve to realize effective management in a variety of
 configurations and environments.  The architecture has been designed
 to meet the needs of implementations of:
  1. minimal SNMP entities with command responder and/or

notification originator applications (traditionally called SNMP

       agents),
  1. SNMP entities with proxy forwarder applications (traditionally

called SNMP proxy agents),

  1. command line driven SNMP entities with command generator and/or

notification receiver applications (traditionally called SNMP

       command line managers),
  1. SNMP entities with command generator and/or notification

receiver, plus command responder and/or notification originator

       applications (traditionally called SNMP mid-level managers or
       dual-role entities),
  1. SNMP entities with command generator and/or notification

receiver and possibly other types of applications for managing

       a potentially very large number of managed nodes (traditionally
       called (network) management stations).

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

1.3. Goals of this Architecture

 This architecture was driven by the following goals:
  1. Use existing materials as much as possible. It is heavily

based on previous work, informally known as SNMPv2u and

       SNMPv2*, based in turn on SNMPv2p.
  1. Address the need for secure SET support, which is considered

the most important deficiency in SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c.

  1. Make it possible to move portions of the architecture forward

in the standards track, even if consensus has not been reached

       on all pieces.
  1. Define an architecture that allows for longevity of the SNMP

Frameworks that have been and will be defined.

  1. Keep SNMP as simple as possible.
  1. Make it relatively inexpensive to deploy a minimal conforming

implementation.

  1. Make it possible to upgrade portions of SNMP as new approaches

become available, without disrupting an entire SNMP framework.

  1. Make it possible to support features required in large

networks, but make the expense of supporting a feature directly

       related to the support of the feature.

1.4. Security Requirements of this Architecture

 Several of the classical threats to network protocols are applicable
 to the management problem and therefore would be applicable to any
 Security Model used in an SNMP Management Framework.  Other threats
 are not applicable to the management problem.  This section discusses
 principal threats, secondary threats, and threats which are of lesser
 importance.
 The principal threats against which any Security Model used within
 this architecture SHOULD provide protection are:
    Modification of Information
       The modification threat is the danger that some unauthorized
       entity may alter in-transit SNMP messages generated on behalf
       of an authorized principal in such a way as to effect
       unauthorized management operations, including falsifying the
       value of an object.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

    Masquerade
       The masquerade threat is the danger that management operations
       not authorized for some principal may be attempted by assuming
       the identity of another principal that has the appropriate
       authorizations.
 Secondary threats against which any Security Model used within this
 architecture SHOULD provide protection are:
    Message Stream Modification
       The SNMP protocol is typically based upon a connectionless
       transport service which may operate over any subnetwork
       service.  The re-ordering, delay or replay of messages can and
       does occur through the natural operation of many such
       subnetwork services.  The message stream modification threat is
       the danger that messages may be maliciously re-ordered, delayed
       or replayed to an extent which is greater than can occur
       through the natural operation of a subnetwork service, in order
       to effect unauthorized management operations.
    Disclosure
       The disclosure threat is the danger of eavesdropping on the
       exchanges between SNMP engines.  Protecting against this threat
       may be required as a matter of local policy.
 There are at least two threats against which a Security Model within
 this architecture need not protect, since they are deemed to be of
 lesser importance in this context:
    Denial of Service
       A Security Model need not attempt to address the broad range of
       attacks by which service on behalf of authorized users is
       denied.  Indeed, such denial-of-service attacks are in many
       cases indistinguishable from the type of network failures with
       which any viable management protocol must cope as a matter of
       course.
    Traffic Analysis
       A Security Model need not attempt to address traffic analysis
       attacks.  Many traffic patterns are predictable - entities may
       be managed on a regular basis by a relatively small number of
       management stations - and therefore there is no significant
       advantage afforded by protecting against traffic analysis.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

1.5. Design Decisions

 Various design decisions were made in support of the goals of the
 architecture and the security requirements:
  1. Architecture

An architecture should be defined which identifies the

       conceptual boundaries between the documents.  Subsystems should
       be defined which describe the abstract services provided by
       specific portions of an SNMP framework.  Abstract service
       interfaces, as described by service primitives, define the
       abstract boundaries between documents, and the abstract
       services that are provided by the conceptual subsystems of an
       SNMP framework.
  1. Self-contained Documents

Elements of procedure plus the MIB objects which are needed for

       processing for a specific portion of an SNMP framework should
       be defined in the same document, and as much as possible,
       should not be referenced in other documents.  This allows
       pieces to be designed and documented as independent and self-
       contained parts, which is consistent with the general SNMP MIB
       module approach.  As portions of SNMP change over time, the
       documents describing other portions of SNMP are not directly
       impacted.  This modularity allows, for example, Security
       Models, authentication and privacy mechanisms, and message
       formats to be upgraded and supplemented as the need arises.
       The self-contained documents can move along the standards track
       on different time-lines.
       This modularity of specification is not meant to be interpreted
       as imposing any specific requirements on implementation.
  1. Threats

The Security Models in the Security Subsystem SHOULD protect

       against the principal and secondary threats: modification of
       information, masquerade, message stream modification and
       disclosure.  They do not need to protect against denial of
       service and traffic analysis.
  1. Remote Configuration

The Security and Access Control Subsystems add a whole new set

       of SNMP configuration parameters.  The Security Subsystem also
       requires frequent changes of secrets at the various SNMP
       entities.  To make this deployable in a large operational
       environment, these SNMP parameters must be remotely
       configurable.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

  1. Controlled Complexity

It is recognized that producers of simple managed devices want

       to keep the resources used by SNMP to a minimum.  At the same
       time, there is a need for more complex configurations which can
       spend more resources for SNMP and thus provide more
       functionality.  The design tries to keep the competing
       requirements of these two environments in balance and allows
       the more complex environments to logically extend the simple
       environment.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

2. Documentation Overview

 The following figure shows the set of documents that fit within the
 SNMP Architecture.
 +------------------------- Document Set ----------------------------+
 |                                                                   |
 | +----------+              +-----------------+  +----------------+ |
 | | Document |              | Applicability   |  | Coexistence    | |
 | | Roadmap  |              | Statement       |  | & Transition   | |
 | +----------+              +-----------------+  +----------------+ |
 |                                                                   |
 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 | | Message Handling                                              | |
 | | +----------------+  +-----------------+  +-----------------+  | |
 | | | Transport      |  | Message         |  | Security        |  | |
 | | | Mappings       |  | Processing and  |  |                 |  | |
 | | |                |  | Dispatcher      |  |                 |  | |
 | | +----------------+  +-----------------+  +-----------------+  | |
 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 |                                                                   |
 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 | | PDU Handling                                                  | |
 | | +----------------+  +-----------------+  +-----------------+  | |
 | | | Protocol       |  | Applications    |  | Access          |  | |
 | | | Operations     |  |                 |  | Control         |  | |
 | | +----------------+  +-----------------+  +-----------------+  | |
 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 |                                                                   |
 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 | | Information Model                                             | |
 | | +--------------+   +--------------+    +---------------+      | |
 | | | Structure of |   | Textual      |    | Conformance   |      | |
 | | | Management   |   | Conventions  |    | Statements    |      | |
 | | | Information  |   |              |    |               |      | |
 | | +--------------+   +--------------+    +---------------+      | |
 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 |                                                                   |
 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 | | MIB Modules written in various formats, e.g.:                 | |
 | | +----------------+ +----------------+                         | |
 | | | SMIv1 (STD 18) | | SMIv2 (STD 58) |                         | |
 | | | format         | | format         |                         | |
 | | +----------------+ +----------------+                         | |
 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 |                                                                   |
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 10] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 Each of these documents may be replaced or supplemented.  This
 Architecture document specifically describes how new documents fit
 into the set of documents in the area of Message and PDU handling.

2.1. Document Roadmap

 One or more documents may be written to describe how sets of
 documents taken together form specific Frameworks.  The configuration
 of document sets might change over time, so the "road map" should be
 maintained in a document separate from the standards documents
 themselves.
 An example of such a roadmap is "Introduction and Applicability
 Statements for the Internet-Standard Management Framework" [RFC3410].

2.2. Applicability Statement

 SNMP is used in networks that vary widely in size and complexity, by
 organizations that vary widely in their requirements of management.
 Some models will be designed to address specific problems of
 management, such as message security.
 One or more documents may be written to describe the environments to
 which certain versions of SNMP or models within SNMP would be
 appropriately applied, and those to which a given model might be
 inappropriately applied.

2.3. Coexistence and Transition

 The purpose of an evolutionary architecture is to permit new models
 to replace or supplement existing models.  The interactions between
 models could result in incompatibilities, security "holes", and other
 undesirable effects.
 The purpose of Coexistence documents is to detail recognized
 anomalies and to describe required and recommended behaviors for
 resolving the interactions between models within the architecture.
 Coexistence documents may be prepared separately from model
 definition documents, to describe and resolve interaction anomalies
 between a model definition and one or more other model definitions.
 Additionally, recommendations for transitions between models may also
 be described, either in a coexistence document or in a separate
 document.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 11] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 One such coexistence document is [RFC2576], "Coexistence between
 Version 1, Version 2, and Version 3 of the Internet-Standard Network
 Management Framework".

2.4. Transport Mappings

 SNMP messages are sent over various transports.  It is the purpose of
 Transport Mapping documents to define how the mapping between SNMP
 and the transport is done.

2.5. Message Processing

 A Message Processing Model document defines a message format, which
 is typically identified by a version field in an SNMP message header.
 The document may also define a MIB module for use in message
 processing and for instrumentation of version-specific interactions.
 An SNMP engine includes one or more Message Processing Models, and
 thus may support sending and receiving multiple versions of SNMP
 messages.

2.6. Security

 Some environments require secure protocol interactions.  Security is
 normally applied at two different stages:
  1. in the transmission/receipt of messages, and
  1. in the processing of the contents of messages.
 For purposes of this document, "security" refers to message-level
 security; "access control" refers to the security applied to protocol
 operations.
 Authentication, encryption, and timeliness checking are common
 functions of message level security.
 A security document describes a Security Model, the threats against
 which the model protects, the goals of the Security Model, the
 protocols which it uses to meet those goals, and it may define a MIB
 module to describe the data used during processing, and to allow the
 remote configuration of message-level security parameters, such as
 keys.
 An SNMP engine may support multiple Security Models concurrently.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

2.7. Access Control

 During processing, it may be required to control access to managed
 objects for operations.
 An Access Control Model defines mechanisms to determine whether
 access to a managed object should be allowed.  An Access Control
 Model may define a MIB module used during processing and to allow the
 remote configuration of access control policies.

2.8. Protocol Operations

 SNMP messages encapsulate an SNMP Protocol Data Unit (PDU).  SNMP
 PDUs define the operations performed by the receiving SNMP engine.
 It is the purpose of a Protocol Operations document to define the
 operations of the protocol with respect to the processing of the
 PDUs.  Every PDU belongs to one or more of the PDU classes defined
 below:
    1) Read Class:
       The Read Class contains protocol operations that retrieve
       management information.  For example, [RFC3416] defines the
       following protocol operations for the Read Class: GetRequest-
       PDU, GetNextRequest-PDU, and GetBulkRequest-PDU.
    2) Write Class:
       The Write Class contains protocol operations which attempt to
       modify management information.  For example, [RFC3416] defines
       the following protocol operation for the Write Class:
       SetRequest-PDU.
    3) Response Class:
       The Response Class contains protocol operations which are sent
       in response to a previous request.  For example, [RFC3416]
       defines the following for the Response Class: Response-PDU,
       Report-PDU.
    4) Notification Class:
       The Notification Class contains protocol operations which send
       a notification to a notification receiver application.  For
       example, [RFC3416] defines the following operations for the
       Notification Class: Trapv2-PDU, InformRequest-PDU.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 13] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

    5) Internal Class:
       The Internal Class contains protocol operations which are
       exchanged internally between SNMP engines.  For example,
       [RFC3416] defines the following operation for the Internal
       Class: Report-PDU.
 The preceding five classifications are based on the functional
 properties of a PDU.  It is also useful to classify PDUs based on
 whether a response is expected:
    6) Confirmed Class:
       The Confirmed Class contains all protocol operations which
       cause the receiving SNMP engine to send back a response.  For
       example, [RFC3416] defines the following operations for the
       Confirmed Class: GetRequest-PDU, GetNextRequest-PDU,
       GetBulkRequest-PDU, SetRequest-PDU, and InformRequest-PDU.
    7) Unconfirmed Class:
       The Unconfirmed Class contains all protocol operations which
       are not acknowledged.  For example, [RFC3416] defines the
       following operations for the Unconfirmed Class: Report-PDU,
       Trapv2-PDU, and GetResponse-PDU.
 An application document defines which Protocol Operations are
 supported by the application.

2.9. Applications

 An SNMP entity normally includes a number of applications.
 Applications use the services of an SNMP engine to accomplish
 specific tasks.  They coordinate the processing of management
 information operations, and may use SNMP messages to communicate with
 other SNMP entities.
 An applications document describes the purpose of an application, the
 services required of the associated SNMP engine, and the protocol
 operations and informational model that the application uses to
 perform management operations.
 An application document defines which set of documents are used to
 specifically define the structure of management information, textual
 conventions, conformance requirements, and operations supported by
 the application.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 14] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

2.10. Structure of Management Information

 Management information is viewed as a collection of managed objects,
 residing in a virtual information store, termed the Management
 Information Base (MIB).  Collections of related objects are defined
 in MIB modules.
 It is the purpose of a Structure of Management Information document
 to establish the notation for defining objects, modules, and other
 elements of managed information.

2.11. Textual Conventions

 When designing a MIB module, it is often useful to define new types
 similar to those defined in the SMI, but with more precise semantics,
 or which have special semantics associated with them.  These newly
 defined types are termed textual conventions, and may be defined in
 separate documents, or within a MIB module.

2.12. Conformance Statements

 It may be useful to define the acceptable lower-bounds of
 implementation, along with the actual level of implementation
 achieved.  It is the purpose of the Conformance Statements document
 to define the notation used for these purposes.

2.13. Management Information Base Modules

 MIB documents describe collections of managed objects which
 instrument some aspect of a managed node.

2.13.1. SNMP Instrumentation MIBs

 An SNMP MIB document may define a collection of managed objects which
 instrument the SNMP protocol itself.  In addition, MIB modules may be
 defined within the documents which describe portions of the SNMP
 architecture, such as the documents for Message processing Models,
 Security Models, etc. for the purpose of instrumenting those Models,
 and for the purpose of allowing their remote configuration.

2.14. SNMP Framework Documents

 This architecture is designed to allow an orderly evolution of
 portions of SNMP Frameworks.
 Throughout the rest of this document, the term "subsystem" refers to
 an abstract and incomplete specification of a portion of a Framework,
 that is further refined by a model specification.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 A "model" describes a specific design of a subsystem, defining
 additional constraints and rules for conformance to the model.  A
 model is sufficiently detailed to make it possible to implement the
 specification.
 An "implementation" is an instantiation of a subsystem, conforming to
 one or more specific models.
 SNMP version 1 (SNMPv1), is the original Internet-Standard Network
 Management Framework, as described in RFCs 1155, 1157, and 1212.
 SNMP version 2 (SNMPv2), is the SNMPv2 Framework as derived from the
 SNMPv1 Framework.  It is described in STD 58, RFCs 2578, 2579, 2580,
 and STD 62, RFCs 3416, 3417, and 3418.  SNMPv2 has no message
 definition.
 The Community-based SNMP version 2 (SNMPv2c), is an experimental SNMP
 Framework which supplements the SNMPv2 Framework, as described in
 [RFC1901].  It adds the SNMPv2c message format, which is similar to
 the SNMPv1 message format.
 SNMP version 3 (SNMPv3), is an extensible SNMP Framework which
 supplements the SNMPv2 Framework, by supporting the following:
  1. a new SNMP message format,
  1. Security for Messages,
  1. Access Control, and
  1. Remote configuration of SNMP parameters.
 Other SNMP Frameworks, i.e., other configurations of implemented
 subsystems, are expected to also be consistent with this
 architecture.

3. Elements of the Architecture

 This section describes the various elements of the architecture and
 how they are named.  There are three kinds of naming:
    1) the naming of entities,
    2) the naming of identities, and
    3) the naming of management information.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 16] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 This architecture also defines some names for other constructs that
 are used in the documentation.

3.1. The Naming of Entities

 An SNMP entity is an implementation of this architecture.  Each such
 SNMP entity consists of an SNMP engine and one or more associated
 applications.
 The following figure shows details about an SNMP entity and the
 components within it.
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |  SNMP entity                                                      |
 |                                                                   |
 |  +-------------------------------------------------------------+  |
 |  |  SNMP engine (identified by snmpEngineID)                   |  |
 |  |                                                             |  |
 |  |  +------------+ +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+  |  |
 |  |  |            | |            | |           | |           |  |  |
 |  |  | Dispatcher | | Message    | | Security  | | Access    |  |  |
 |  |  |            | | Processing | | Subsystem | | Control   |  |  |
 |  |  |            | | Subsystem  | |           | | Subsystem |  |  |
 |  |  |            | |            | |           | |           |  |  |
 |  |  +------------+ +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+  |  |
 |  |                                                             |  |
 |  +-------------------------------------------------------------+  |
 |                                                                   |
 |  +-------------------------------------------------------------+  |
 |  |  Application(s)                                             |  |
 |  |                                                             |  |
 |  |  +-------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+        |  |
 |  |  | Command     |  | Notification |  | Proxy        |        |  |
 |  |  | Generator   |  | Receiver     |  | Forwarder    |        |  |
 |  |  +-------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+        |  |
 |  |                                                             |  |
 |  |  +-------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+        |  |
 |  |  | Command     |  | Notification |  | Other        |        |  |
 |  |  | Responder   |  | Originator   |  |              |        |  |
 |  |  +-------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+        |  |
 |  |                                                             |  |
 |  +-------------------------------------------------------------+  |
 |                                                                   |
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 17] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.1.1. SNMP engine

 An SNMP engine provides services for sending and receiving messages,
 authenticating and encrypting messages, and controlling access to
 managed objects.  There is a one-to-one association between an SNMP
 engine and the SNMP entity which contains it.
 The engine contains:
    1) a Dispatcher,
    2) a Message Processing Subsystem,
    3) a Security Subsystem, and
    4) an Access Control Subsystem.

3.1.1.1. snmpEngineID

 Within an administrative domain, an snmpEngineID is the unique and
 unambiguous identifier of an SNMP engine.  Since there is a one-to-
 one association between SNMP engines and SNMP entities, it also
 uniquely and unambiguously identifies the SNMP entity within that
 administrative domain.  Note that it is possible for SNMP entities in
 different administrative domains to have the same value for
 snmpEngineID.  Federation of administrative domains may necessitate
 assignment of new values.

3.1.1.2. Dispatcher

 There is only one Dispatcher in an SNMP engine.  It allows for
 concurrent support of multiple versions of SNMP messages in the SNMP
 engine.  It does so by:
  1. sending and receiving SNMP messages to/from the network,
  1. determining the version of an SNMP message and interacting with

the corresponding Message Processing Model,

  1. providing an abstract interface to SNMP applications for

delivery of a PDU to an application.

  1. providing an abstract interface for SNMP applications that

allows them to send a PDU to a remote SNMP entity.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 18] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.1.1.3. Message Processing Subsystem

 The Message Processing Subsystem is responsible for preparing
 messages for sending, and extracting data from received messages.
 The Message Processing Subsystem potentially contains multiple
 Message Processing Models as shown in the next figure.
  • One or more Message Processing Models may be present.
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                                                  |
 |  Message Processing Subsystem                                    |
 |                                                                  |
 |  +------------+  +------------+  +------------+  +------------+  |
 |  |          * |  |          * |  |          * |  |          * |  |
 |  | SNMPv3     |  | SNMPv1     |  | SNMPv2c    |  | Other      |  |
 |  | Message    |  | Message    |  | Message    |  | Message    |  |
 |  | Processing |  | Processing |  | Processing |  | Processing |  |
 |  | Model      |  | Model      |  | Model      |  | Model      |  |
 |  |            |  |            |  |            |  |            |  |
 |  +------------+  +------------+  +------------+  +------------+  |
 |                                                                  |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+

3.1.1.3.1. Message Processing Model

 Each Message Processing Model defines the format of a particular
 version of an SNMP message and coordinates the preparation and
 extraction of each such version-specific message format.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 19] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.1.1.4. Security Subsystem

 The Security Subsystem provides security services such as the
 authentication and privacy of messages and potentially contains
 multiple Security Models as shown in the following figure
  • One or more Security Models may be present.
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                                                  |
 |  Security Subsystem                                              |
 |                                                                  |
 |  +----------------+  +-----------------+  +-------------------+  |
 |  |              * |  |               * |  |                 * |  |
 |  | User-Based     |  | Other           |  | Other             |  |
 |  | Security       |  | Security        |  | Security          |  |
 |  | Model          |  | Model           |  | Model             |  |
 |  |                |  |                 |  |                   |  |
 |  +----------------+  +-----------------+  +-------------------+  |
 |                                                                  |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+

3.1.1.4.1. Security Model

 A Security Model specifies the threats against which it protects, the
 goals of its services, and the security protocols used to provide
 security services such as authentication and privacy.

3.1.1.4.2. Security Protocol

 A Security Protocol specifies the mechanisms, procedures, and MIB
 objects used to provide a security service such as authentication or
 privacy.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 20] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.1.2. Access Control Subsystem

 The Access Control Subsystem provides authorization services by means
 of one or more (*) Access Control Models.
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                                                  |
 |  Access Control Subsystem                                        |
 |                                                                  |
 |  +---------------+   +-----------------+   +------------------+  |
 |  |             * |   |               * |   |                * |  |
 |  | View-Based    |   | Other           |   | Other            |  |
 |  | Access        |   | Access          |   | Access           |  |
 |  | Control       |   | Control         |   | Control          |  |
 |  | Model         |   | Model           |   | Model            |  |
 |  |               |   |                 |   |                  |  |
 |  +---------------+   +-----------------+   +------------------+  |
 |                                                                  |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+

3.1.2.1. Access Control Model

 An Access Control Model defines a particular access decision function
 in order to support decisions regarding access rights.

3.1.3. Applications

 There are several types of applications, including:
  1. command generators, which monitor and manipulate management

data,

  1. command responders, which provide access to management data,
  1. notification originators, which initiate asynchronous messages,
  1. notification receivers, which process asynchronous messages,
    and
  1. proxy forwarders, which forward messages between entities.
 These applications make use of the services provided by the SNMP
 engine.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 21] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.1.3.1. SNMP Manager

 An SNMP entity containing one or more command generator and/or
 notification receiver applications (along with their associated SNMP
 engine) has traditionally been called an SNMP manager.
                     (traditional SNMP manager)
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
 | +--------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+  SNMP entity |
 | | NOTIFICATION |  | NOTIFICATION |  |   COMMAND    |              |
 | |  ORIGINATOR  |  |   RECEIVER   |  |  GENERATOR   |              |
 | | applications |  | applications |  | applications |              |
 | +--------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+              |
 |         ^                ^                 ^                      |
 |         |                |                 |                      |
 |         v                v                 v                      |
 |         +-------+--------+-----------------+                      |
 |                 ^                                                 |
 |                 |     +---------------------+  +----------------+ |
 |                 |     | Message Processing  |  | Security       | |
 | Dispatcher      v     | Subsystem           |  | Subsystem      | |
 | +-------------------+ |     +------------+  |  |                | |
 | | PDU Dispatcher    | |  +->| v1MP     * |<--->| +------------+ | |
 | |                   | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Other      | | |
 | |                   | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Security   | | |
 | |                   | |  +->| v2cMP    * |<--->| | Model      | | |
 | | Message           | |  |  +------------+  |  | +------------+ | |
 | | Dispatcher  <--------->+                  |  |                | |
 | |                   | |  |  +------------+  |  | +------------+ | |
 | |                   | |  +->| v3MP     * |<--->| | User-based | | |
 | | Transport         | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Security   | | |
 | | Mapping           | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Model      | | |
 | | (e.g., RFC 3417)  | |  +->| otherMP  * |<--->| +------------+ | |
 | +-------------------+ |     +------------+  |  |                | |
 |          ^            +---------------------+  +----------------+ |
 |          |                                                        |
 |          v                                                        |
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
 +-----+ +-----+       +-------+
 | UDP | | IPX | . . . | other |
 +-----+ +-----+       +-------+
    ^       ^              ^
    |       |              |      * One or more models may be present.
    v       v              v
 +------------------------------+
 |           Network            |
 +------------------------------+

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 22] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.1.3.2. SNMP Agent

 An SNMP entity containing one or more command responder and/or
 notification originator applications (along with their associated
 SNMP engine) has traditionally been called an SNMP agent.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 23] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

  • One or more models may be present.
 +------------------------------+
 |           Network            |
 +------------------------------+
    ^       ^              ^
    |       |              |
    v       v              v
 +-----+ +-----+       +-------+
 | UDP | | IPX | . . . | other |
 +-----+ +-----+       +-------+              (traditional SNMP agent)
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |              ^                                                    |
 |              |        +---------------------+  +----------------+ |
 |              |        | Message Processing  |  | Security       | |
 | Dispatcher   v        | Subsystem           |  | Subsystem      | |
 | +-------------------+ |     +------------+  |  |                | |
 | | Transport         | |  +->| v1MP     * |<--->| +------------+ | |
 | | Mapping           | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Other      | | |
 | | (e.g., RFC 3417)  | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Security   | | |
 | |                   | |  +->| v2cMP    * |<--->| | Model      | | |
 | | Message           | |  |  +------------+  |  | +------------+ | |
 | | Dispatcher  <--------->|  +------------+  |  | +------------+ | |
 | |                   | |  +->| v3MP     * |<--->| | User-based | | |
 | |                   | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Security   | | |
 | | PDU Dispatcher    | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Model      | | |
 | +-------------------+ |  +->| otherMP  * |<--->| +------------+ | |
 |              ^        |     +------------+  |  |                | |
 |              |        +---------------------+  +----------------+ |
 |              v                                                    |
 |      +-------+-------------------------+---------------+          |
 |      ^                                 ^               ^          |
 |      |                                 |               |          |
 |      v                                 v               v          |
 | +-------------+   +---------+   +--------------+  +-------------+ |
 | |   COMMAND   |   | ACCESS  |   | NOTIFICATION |  |    PROXY    | |
 | |  RESPONDER  |<->| CONTROL |<->|  ORIGINATOR  |  |  FORWARDER  | |
 | | application |   |         |   | applications |  | application | |
 | +-------------+   +---------+   +--------------+  +-------------+ |
 |      ^                                 ^                          |
 |      |                                 |                          |
 |      v                                 v                          |
 | +----------------------------------------------+                  |
 | |             MIB instrumentation              |      SNMP entity |
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 24] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.2. The Naming of Identities

                          principal
                              ^
                              |
                              |
 +----------------------------|-------------+
 | SNMP engine                v             |
 |                    +--------------+      |
 |                    |              |      |
 |  +-----------------| securityName |---+  |
 |  | Security Model  |              |   |  |
 |  |                 +--------------+   |  |
 |  |                         ^          |  |
 |  |                         |          |  |
 |  |                         v          |  |
 |  |  +------------------------------+  |  |
 |  |  |                              |  |  |
 |  |  | Model                        |  |  |
 |  |  | Dependent                    |  |  |
 |  |  | Security ID                  |  |  |
 |  |  |                              |  |  |
 |  |  +------------------------------+  |  |
 |  |                         ^          |  |
 |  |                         |          |  |
 |  +-------------------------|----------+  |
 |                            |             |
 |                            |             |
 +----------------------------|-------------+
                              |
                              v
                           network

3.2.1. Principal

 A principal is the "who" on whose behalf services are provided or
 processing takes place.
 A principal can be, among other things, an individual acting in a
 particular role; a set of individuals, with each acting in a
 particular role; an application or a set of applications; and
 combinations thereof.

3.2.2. securityName

 A securityName is a human readable string representing a principal.
 It has a model-independent format, and can be used outside a
 particular Security Model.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 25] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.2.3. Model-dependent security ID

 A model-dependent security ID is the model-specific representation of
 a securityName within a particular Security Model.
 Model-dependent security IDs may or may not be human readable, and
 have a model-dependent syntax.  Examples include community names, and
 user names.
 The transformation of model-dependent security IDs into securityNames
 and vice versa is the responsibility of the relevant Security Model.

3.3. The Naming of Management Information

 Management information resides at an SNMP entity where a Command
 Responder Application has local access to potentially multiple
 contexts.  This application uses a contextEngineID equal to the
 snmpEngineID of its associated SNMP engine.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 26] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
 |  SNMP entity (identified by snmpEngineID, for example:          |
 |  '800002b804616263'H (enterpise 696, string "abc")              |
 |                                                                 |
 |  +------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 |  | SNMP engine (identified by snmpEngineID)                   | |
 |  |                                                            | |
 |  | +-------------+ +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ | |
 |  | |             | |            | |           | |           | | |
 |  | | Dispatcher  | | Message    | | Security  | | Access    | | |
 |  | |             | | Processing | | Subsystem | | Control   | | |
 |  | |             | | Subsystem  | |           | | Subsystem | | |
 |  | |             | |            | |           | |           | | |
 |  | +-------------+ +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ | |
 |  |                                                            | |
 |  +------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 |                                                                 |
 |  +------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 |  |  Command Responder Application                             | |
 |  |  (contextEngineID, example: '800002b804616263'H)           | |
 |  |                                                            | |
 |  |  example contextNames:                                     | |
 |  |                                                            | |
 |  |  "bridge1"          "bridge2"            "" (default)      | |
 |  |  ---------          ---------            ------------      | |
 |  |      |                  |                   |              | |
 |  +------|------------------|-------------------|--------------+ |
 |         |                  |                   |                |
 |  +------|------------------|-------------------|--------------+ |
 |  |  MIB | instrumentation  |                   |              | |
 |  |  +---v------------+ +---v------------+ +----v-----------+  | |
 |  |  | context        | | context        | | context        |  | |
 |  |  |                | |                | |                |  | |
 |  |  | +------------+ | | +------------+ | | +------------+ |  | |
 |  |  | | bridge MIB | | | | bridge MIB | | | | some  MIB  | |  | |
 |  |  | +------------+ | | +------------+ | | +------------+ |  | |
 |  |  |                | |                | |                |  | |
 |  |  |                | |                | | +------------+ |  | |
 |  |  |                | |                | | | other MIB  | |  | |
 |  |  |                | |                | | +------------+ |  | |
 |  |  |                | |                | |                |  | |
 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 27] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.3.1. An SNMP Context

 An SNMP context, or just "context" for short, is a collection of
 management information accessible by an SNMP entity.  An item of
 management information may exist in more than one context.  An SNMP
 entity potentially has access to many contexts.
 Typically, there are many instances of each managed object type
 within a management domain.  For simplicity, the method for
 identifying instances specified by the MIB module does not allow each
 instance to be distinguished amongst the set of all instances within
 a management domain; rather, it allows each instance to be identified
 only within some scope or "context", where there are multiple such
 contexts within the management domain.  Often, a context is a
 physical device, or perhaps, a logical device, although a context can
 also encompass multiple devices, or a subset of a single device, or
 even a subset of multiple devices, but a context is always defined as
 a subset of a single SNMP entity.  Thus, in order to identify an
 individual item of management information within the management
 domain, its contextName and contextEngineID must be identified in
 addition to its object type and its instance.
 For example, the managed object type ifDescr [RFC2863], is defined as
 the description of a network interface.  To identify the description
 of device-X's first network interface, four pieces of information are
 needed: the snmpEngineID of the SNMP entity which provides access to
 the management information at device-X, the contextName (device-X),
 the managed object type (ifDescr), and the instance ("1").
 Each context has (at least) one unique identification within the
 management domain.  The same item of management information can exist
 in multiple contexts.  An item of management information may have
 multiple unique identifications.  This occurs when an item of
 management information exists in multiple contexts, and this also
 occurs when a context has multiple unique identifications.
 The combination of a contextEngineID and a contextName unambiguously
 identifies a context within an administrative domain; note that there
 may be multiple unique combinations of contextEngineID and
 contextName that unambiguously identify the same context.

3.3.2. contextEngineID

 Within an administrative domain, a contextEngineID uniquely
 identifies an SNMP entity that may realize an instance of a context
 with a particular contextName.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 28] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

3.3.3. contextName

 A contextName is used to name a context.  Each contextName MUST be
 unique within an SNMP entity.

3.3.4. scopedPDU

 A scopedPDU is a block of data containing a contextEngineID, a
 contextName, and a PDU.
 The PDU is an SNMP Protocol Data Unit containing information named in
 the context which is unambiguously identified within an
 administrative domain by the combination of the contextEngineID and
 the contextName.  See, for example, RFC 3416 for more information
 about SNMP PDUs.

3.4. Other Constructs

3.4.1. maxSizeResponseScopedPDU

 The maxSizeResponseScopedPDU is the maximum size of a scopedPDU that
 a PDU's sender would be willing to accept.  Note that the size of a
 scopedPDU does not include the size of the SNMP message header.

3.4.2. Local Configuration Datastore

 The subsystems, models, and applications within an SNMP entity may
 need to retain their own sets of configuration information.
 Portions of the configuration information may be accessible as
 managed objects.
 The collection of these sets of information is referred to as an
 entity's Local Configuration Datastore (LCD).

3.4.3. securityLevel

 This architecture recognizes three levels of security:
  1. without authentication and without privacy (noAuthNoPriv)
  1. with authentication but without privacy (authNoPriv)
  1. with authentication and with privacy (authPriv)

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 29] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 These three values are ordered such that noAuthNoPriv is less than
 authNoPriv and authNoPriv is less than authPriv.
 Every message has an associated securityLevel.  All Subsystems
 (Message Processing, Security, Access Control) and applications are
 REQUIRED to either supply a value of securityLevel or to abide by the
 supplied value of securityLevel while processing the message and its
 contents.

4. Abstract Service Interfaces

 Abstract service interfaces have been defined to describe the
 conceptual interfaces between the various subsystems within an SNMP
 entity.  The abstract service interfaces are intended to help clarify
 the externally observable behavior of SNMP entities, and are not
 intended to constrain the structure or organization of
 implementations in any way.  Most specifically, they should not be
 interpreted as APIs or as requirements statements for APIs.
 These abstract service interfaces are defined by a set of primitives
 that define the services provided and the abstract data elements that
 are to be passed when the services are invoked.  This section lists
 the primitives that have been defined for the various subsystems.

4.1. Dispatcher Primitives

 The Dispatcher typically provides services to the SNMP applications
 via its PDU Dispatcher.  This section describes the primitives
 provided by the PDU Dispatcher.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 30] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

4.1.1. Generate Outgoing Request or Notification

 The PDU Dispatcher provides the following primitive for an
 application to send an SNMP Request or Notification to another SNMP
 entity:
 statusInformation =              -- sendPduHandle if success
                                  -- errorIndication if failure
   sendPdu(
   IN   transportDomain           -- transport domain to be used
   IN   transportAddress          -- transport address to be used
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   securityModel             -- Security Model to use
   IN   securityName              -- on behalf of this principal
   IN   securityLevel             -- Level of Security requested
   IN   contextEngineID           -- data from/at this entity
   IN   contextName               -- data from/in this context
   IN   pduVersion                -- the version of the PDU
   IN   PDU                       -- SNMP Protocol Data Unit
   IN   expectResponse            -- TRUE or FALSE
        )

4.1.2. Process Incoming Request or Notification PDU

 The PDU Dispatcher provides the following primitive to pass an
 incoming SNMP PDU to an application:
 processPdu(                      -- process Request/Notification PDU
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   securityModel             -- Security Model in use
   IN   securityName              -- on behalf of this principal
   IN   securityLevel             -- Level of Security
   IN   contextEngineID           -- data from/at this SNMP entity
   IN   contextName               -- data from/in this context
   IN   pduVersion                -- the version of the PDU
   IN   PDU                       -- SNMP Protocol Data Unit
   IN   maxSizeResponseScopedPDU  -- maximum size of the Response PDU
   IN   stateReference            -- reference to state information
        )                         -- needed when sending a response

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 31] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

4.1.3. Generate Outgoing Response

 The PDU Dispatcher provides the following primitive for an
 application to return an SNMP Response PDU to the PDU Dispatcher:
 result =                         -- SUCCESS or FAILURE
 returnResponsePdu(
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   securityModel             -- Security Model in use
   IN   securityName              -- on behalf of this principal
   IN   securityLevel             -- same as on incoming request
   IN   contextEngineID           -- data from/at this SNMP entity
   IN   contextName               -- data from/in this context
   IN   pduVersion                -- the version of the PDU
   IN   PDU                       -- SNMP Protocol Data Unit
   IN   maxSizeResponseScopedPDU  -- maximum size sender can accept
   IN   stateReference            -- reference to state information
                                  -- as presented with the request
   IN   statusInformation         -- success or errorIndication
        )                         -- error counter OID/value if error

4.1.4. Process Incoming Response PDU

 The PDU Dispatcher provides the following primitive to pass an
 incoming SNMP Response PDU to an application:
 processResponsePdu(              -- process Response PDU
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   securityModel             -- Security Model in use
   IN   securityName              -- on behalf of this principal
   IN   securityLevel             -- Level of Security
   IN   contextEngineID           -- data from/at this SNMP entity
   IN   contextName               -- data from/in this context
   IN   pduVersion                -- the version of the PDU
   IN   PDU                       -- SNMP Protocol Data Unit
   IN   statusInformation         -- success or errorIndication
   IN   sendPduHandle             -- handle from sendPdu
        )

4.1.5. Registering Responsibility for Handling SNMP PDUs

 Applications can register/unregister responsibility for a specific
 contextEngineID, for specific pduTypes, with the PDU Dispatcher
 according to the following primitives.  The list of particular
 pduTypes that an application can register for is determined by the
 Message Processing Model(s) supported by the SNMP entity that
 contains the PDU Dispatcher.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 32] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 statusInformation =            -- success or errorIndication
   registerContextEngineID(
   IN   contextEngineID         -- take responsibility for this one
   IN   pduType                 -- the pduType(s) to be registered
        )
 unregisterContextEngineID(
   IN   contextEngineID         -- give up responsibility for this one
   IN   pduType                 -- the pduType(s) to be unregistered
        )
 Note that realizations of the registerContextEngineID and
 unregisterContextEngineID abstract service interfaces may provide
 implementation-specific ways for applications to register/deregister
 responsibility for all possible values of the contextEngineID or
 pduType parameters.

4.2. Message Processing Subsystem Primitives

 The Dispatcher interacts with a Message Processing Model to process a
 specific version of an SNMP Message.  This section describes the
 primitives provided by the Message Processing Subsystem.

4.2.1. Prepare Outgoing SNMP Request or Notification Message

 The Message Processing Subsystem provides this service primitive for
 preparing an outgoing SNMP Request or Notification Message:
 statusInformation =              -- success or errorIndication
   prepareOutgoingMessage(
   IN   transportDomain           -- transport domain to be used
   IN   transportAddress          -- transport address to be used
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   securityModel             -- Security Model to use
   IN   securityName              -- on behalf of this principal
   IN   securityLevel             -- Level of Security requested
   IN   contextEngineID           -- data from/at this entity
   IN   contextName               -- data from/in this context
   IN   pduVersion                -- the version of the PDU
   IN   PDU                       -- SNMP Protocol Data Unit
   IN   expectResponse            -- TRUE or FALSE
   IN   sendPduHandle             -- the handle for matching
                                  -- incoming responses
   OUT  destTransportDomain       -- destination transport domain
   OUT  destTransportAddress      -- destination transport address
   OUT  outgoingMessage           -- the message to send
   OUT  outgoingMessageLength     -- its length
        )

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 33] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

4.2.2. Prepare an Outgoing SNMP Response Message

 The Message Processing Subsystem provides this service primitive for
 preparing an outgoing SNMP Response Message:
 result =                         -- SUCCESS or FAILURE
   prepareResponseMessage(
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   securityModel             -- same as on incoming request
   IN   securityName              -- same as on incoming request
   IN   securityLevel             -- same as on incoming request
   IN   contextEngineID           -- data from/at this SNMP entity
   IN   contextName               -- data from/in this context
   IN   pduVersion                -- the version of the PDU
   IN   PDU                       -- SNMP Protocol Data Unit
   IN   maxSizeResponseScopedPDU  -- maximum size able to accept
   IN   stateReference            -- reference to state information
                                  -- as presented with the request
   IN   statusInformation         -- success or errorIndication
                                  -- error counter OID/value if error
   OUT  destTransportDomain       -- destination transport domain
   OUT  destTransportAddress      -- destination transport address
   OUT  outgoingMessage           -- the message to send
   OUT  outgoingMessageLength     -- its length
        )

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 34] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

4.2.3. Prepare Data Elements from an Incoming SNMP Message

 The Message Processing Subsystem provides this service primitive for
 preparing the abstract data elements from an incoming SNMP message:
 result =                         -- SUCCESS or errorIndication
   prepareDataElements(
   IN   transportDomain           -- origin transport domain
   IN   transportAddress          -- origin transport address
   IN   wholeMsg                  -- as received from the network
   IN   wholeMsgLength            -- as received from the network
   OUT  messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   OUT  securityModel             -- Security Model to use
   OUT  securityName              -- on behalf of this principal
   OUT  securityLevel             -- Level of Security requested
   OUT  contextEngineID           -- data from/at this entity
   OUT  contextName               -- data from/in this context
   OUT  pduVersion                -- the version of the PDU
   OUT  PDU                       -- SNMP Protocol Data Unit
   OUT  pduType                   -- SNMP PDU type
   OUT  sendPduHandle             -- handle for matched request
   OUT  maxSizeResponseScopedPDU  -- maximum size sender can accept
   OUT  statusInformation         -- success or errorIndication
                                  -- error counter OID/value if error
   OUT  stateReference            -- reference to state information
                                  -- to be used for possible Response
        )

4.3. Access Control Subsystem Primitives

 Applications are the typical clients of the service(s) of the Access
 Control Subsystem.
 The following primitive is provided by the Access Control Subsystem
 to check if access is allowed:
 statusInformation =              -- success or errorIndication
   isAccessAllowed(
   IN   securityModel             -- Security Model in use
   IN   securityName              -- principal who wants to access
   IN   securityLevel             -- Level of Security
   IN   viewType                  -- read, write, or notify view
   IN   contextName               -- context containing variableName
   IN   variableName              -- OID for the managed object
        )

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 35] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

4.4. Security Subsystem Primitives

 The Message Processing Subsystem is the typical client of the
 services of the Security Subsystem.

4.4.1. Generate a Request or Notification Message

 The Security Subsystem provides the following primitive to generate a
 Request or Notification message:
 statusInformation =
   generateRequestMsg(
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   globalData                -- message header, admin data
   IN   maxMessageSize            -- of the sending SNMP entity
   IN   securityModel             -- for the outgoing message
   IN   securityEngineID          -- authoritative SNMP entity
   IN   securityName              -- on behalf of this principal
   IN   securityLevel             -- Level of Security requested
   IN   scopedPDU                 -- message (plaintext) payload
   OUT  securityParameters        -- filled in by Security Module
   OUT  wholeMsg                  -- complete generated message
   OUT  wholeMsgLength            -- length of the generated message
        )

4.4.2. Process Incoming Message

 The Security Subsystem provides the following primitive to process an
 incoming message:
 statusInformation =              -- errorIndication or success
                                  -- error counter OID/value if error
   processIncomingMsg(
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   maxMessageSize            -- of the sending SNMP entity
   IN   securityParameters        -- for the received message
   IN   securityModel             -- for the received message
   IN   securityLevel             -- Level of Security
   IN   wholeMsg                  -- as received on the wire
   IN   wholeMsgLength            -- length as received on the wire
   OUT  securityEngineID          -- authoritative SNMP entity
   OUT  securityName              -- identification of the principal
   OUT  scopedPDU,                -- message (plaintext) payload
   OUT  maxSizeResponseScopedPDU  -- maximum size sender can handle
   OUT  securityStateReference    -- reference to security state
        )                         -- information, needed for response

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 36] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

4.4.3. Generate a Response Message

 The Security Subsystem provides the following primitive to generate a
 Response message:
 statusInformation =
   generateResponseMsg(
   IN   messageProcessingModel    -- typically, SNMP version
   IN   globalData                -- message header, admin data
   IN   maxMessageSize            -- of the sending SNMP entity
   IN   securityModel             -- for the outgoing message
   IN   securityEngineID          -- authoritative SNMP entity
   IN   securityName              -- on behalf of this principal
   IN   securityLevel             -- for the outgoing message
   IN   scopedPDU                 -- message (plaintext) payload
   IN   securityStateReference    -- reference to security state
                                  -- information from original request
   OUT  securityParameters        -- filled in by Security Module
   OUT  wholeMsg                  -- complete generated message
   OUT  wholeMsgLength            -- length of the generated message
        )

4.5. Common Primitives

 These primitive(s) are provided by multiple Subsystems.

4.5.1. Release State Reference Information

 All Subsystems which pass stateReference information also provide a
 primitive to release the memory that holds the referenced state
 information:
 stateRelease(
   IN   stateReference       -- handle of reference to be released
        )

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 37] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

4.6. Scenario Diagrams

4.6.1. Command Generator or Notification Originator

 This diagram shows how a Command Generator or Notification Originator
 application requests that a PDU be sent, and how the response is
 returned (asynchronously) to that application.
 Command           Dispatcher               Message           Security
 Generator            |                     Processing           Model
 |                    |                     Model                    |
 |      sendPdu       |                        |                     |
 |------------------->|                        |                     |
 |                    | prepareOutgoingMessage |                     |
 :                    |----------------------->|                     |
 :                    |                        | generateRequestMsg  |
 :                    |                        |-------------------->|
 :                    |                        |                     |
 :                    |                        |<--------------------|
 :                    |                        |                     |
 :                    |<-----------------------|                     |
 :                    |                        |                     |
 :                    |------------------+     |                     |
 :                    | Send SNMP        |     |                     |
 :                    | Request Message  |     |                     |
 :                    | to Network       |     |                     |
 :                    |                  v     |                     |
 :                    :                  :     :                     :
 :                    :                  :     :                     :
 :                    :                  :     :                     :
 :                    |                  |     |                     |
 :                    | Receive SNMP     |     |                     |
 :                    | Response Message |     |                     |
 :                    | from Network     |     |                     |
 :                    |<-----------------+     |                     |
 :                    |                        |                     |
 :                    |   prepareDataElements  |                     |
 :                    |----------------------->|                     |
 :                    |                        | processIncomingMsg  |
 :                    |                        |-------------------->|
 :                    |                        |                     |
 :                    |                        |<--------------------|
 :                    |                        |                     |
 :                    |<-----------------------|                     |
 | processResponsePdu |                        |                     |
 |<-------------------|                        |                     |
 |                    |                        |                     |

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 38] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

4.6.2. Scenario Diagram for a Command Responder Application

 This diagram shows how a Command Responder or Notification Receiver
 application registers for handling a pduType, how a PDU is dispatched
 to the application after an SNMP message is received, and how the
 Response is (asynchronously) send back to the network.
 Command               Dispatcher            Message          Security
 Responder                 |                 Processing          Model
 |                         |                 Model                   |
 |                         |                    |                    |
 | registerContextEngineID |                    |                    |
 |------------------------>|                    |                    |
 |<------------------------|              |     |                    |
 |                         | Receive SNMP |     |                    |
 :                         | Message      |     |                    |
 :                         | from Network |     |                    |
 :                         |<-------------+     |                    |
 :                         |                    |                    |
 :                         |prepareDataElements |                    |
 :                         |------------------->|                    |
 :                         |                    | processIncomingMsg |
 :                         |                    |------------------->|
 :                         |                    |                    |
 :                         |                    |<-------------------|
 :                         |                    |                    |
 :                         |<-------------------|                    |
 |     processPdu          |                    |                    |
 |<------------------------|                    |                    |
 |                         |                    |                    |
 :                         :                    :                    :
 :                         :                    :                    :
 |    returnResponsePdu    |                    |                    |
 |------------------------>|                    |                    |
 :                         | prepareResponseMsg |                    |
 :                         |------------------->|                    |
 :                         |                    |generateResponseMsg |
 :                         |                    |------------------->|
 :                         |                    |                    |
 :                         |                    |<-------------------|
 :                         |                    |                    |
 :                         |<-------------------|                    |
 :                         |                    |                    |
 :                         |--------------+     |                    |
 :                         | Send SNMP    |     |                    |
 :                         | Message      |     |                    |
 :                         | to Network   |     |                    |
 :                         |              v     |                    |

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 39] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

5. Managed Object Definitions for SNMP Management Frameworks

SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS

  MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
  OBJECT-IDENTITY,
  snmpModules                           FROM SNMPv2-SMI
  TEXTUAL-CONVENTION                    FROM SNMPv2-TC
  MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP       FROM SNMPv2-CONF;

snmpFrameworkMIB MODULE-IDENTITY

  LAST-UPDATED "200210140000Z"
  ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
  CONTACT-INFO "WG-EMail:   snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com
                Subscribe:  snmpv3-request@lists.tislabs.com
                Co-Chair:   Russ Mundy
                            Network Associates Laboratories
                postal:     15204 Omega Drive, Suite 300
                            Rockville, MD 20850-4601
                            USA
                EMail:      mundy@tislabs.com
                phone:      +1 301-947-7107
                Co-Chair &
                Co-editor:  David Harrington
                            Enterasys Networks
                postal:     35 Industrial Way
                            P. O. Box 5005
                            Rochester, New Hampshire 03866-5005
                            USA
                EMail:      dbh@enterasys.com
                phone:      +1 603-337-2614
                Co-editor:  Randy Presuhn
                            BMC Software, Inc.
                postal:     2141 North First Street
                            San Jose, California 95131
                            USA
                EMail:      randy_presuhn@bmc.com
                phone:      +1 408-546-1006
                Co-editor:  Bert Wijnen
                            Lucent Technologies
                postal:     Schagen 33
                            3461 GL Linschoten
                            Netherlands

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 40] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

                EMail:      bwijnen@lucent.com
                phone:      +31 348-680-485
                  "
     DESCRIPTION  "The SNMP Management Architecture MIB
                   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). This
                   version of this MIB module is part of RFC 3411;
                   see the RFC itself for full legal notices.
                  "
     REVISION     "200210140000Z"         -- 14 October 2002
     DESCRIPTION  "Changes in this revision:
                   - Updated various administrative information.
                   - Corrected some typos.
                   - Corrected typo in description of SnmpEngineID
                     that led to range overlap for 127.
                   - Changed '255a' to '255t' in definition of
                     SnmpAdminString to align with current SMI.
                   - Reworded 'reserved' for value zero in
                     DESCRIPTION of SnmpSecurityModel.
                   - The algorithm for allocating security models
                     should give 256 per enterprise block, rather
                     than 255.
                   - The example engine ID of 'abcd' is not
                     legal. Replaced with '800002b804616263'H based
                     on example enterprise 696, string 'abc'.
                   - Added clarification that engineID should
                     persist across re-initializations.
                   This revision published as RFC 3411.
                  "
     REVISION     "199901190000Z"         -- 19 January 1999
     DESCRIPTION  "Updated editors' addresses, fixed typos.
                   Published as RFC 2571.
                  "
     REVISION     "199711200000Z"         -- 20 November 1997
     DESCRIPTION  "The initial version, published in RFC 2271.
                  "
     ::= { snmpModules 10 }
  1. - Textual Conventions used in the SNMP Management Architecture * SnmpEngineID ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An SNMP engine's administratively-unique identifier. Objects of this type are for identification, not for addressing, even though it is possible that an address may have been used in the generation of a specific value. Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 41] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002 The value for this object may not be all zeros or all 'ff'H or the empty (zero length) string. The initial value for this object may be configured via an operator console entry or via an algorithmic function. In the latter case, the following example algorithm is recommended. In cases where there are multiple engines on the same system, the use of this algorithm is NOT appropriate, as it would result in all of those engines ending up with the same ID value. 1) The very first bit is used to indicate how the rest of the data is composed. 0 - as defined by enterprise using former methods that existed before SNMPv3. See item 2 below. 1 - as defined by this architecture, see item 3 below. Note that this allows existing uses of the engineID (also known as AgentID [RFC1910]) to co-exist with any new uses. 2) The snmpEngineID has a length of 12 octets. The first four octets are set to the binary equivalent of the agent's SNMP management private enterprise number as assigned by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). For example, if Acme Networks has been assigned { enterprises 696 }, the first four octets would be assigned '000002b8'H. The remaining eight octets are determined via one or more enterprise-specific methods. Such methods must be designed so as to maximize the possibility that the value of this object will be unique in the agent's administrative domain. For example, it may be the IP address of the SNMP entity, or the MAC address of one of the interfaces, with each address suitably padded with random octets. If multiple methods are defined, then it is recommended that the first octet indicate the method being used and the remaining octets be a function of the method. Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 42] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002 3) The length of the octet string varies. The first four octets are set to the binary equivalent of the agent's SNMP management private enterprise number as assigned by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). For example, if Acme Networks has been assigned { enterprises 696 }, the first four octets would be assigned '000002b8'H. The very first bit is set to 1. For example, the above value for Acme Networks now changes to be '800002b8'H. The fifth octet indicates how the rest (6th and following octets) are formatted. The values for the fifth octet are: 0 - reserved, unused. 1 - IPv4 address (4 octets) lowest non-special IP address 2 - IPv6 address (16 octets) lowest non-special IP address 3 - MAC address (6 octets) lowest IEEE MAC address, canonical order 4 - Text, administratively assigned Maximum remaining length 27 5 - Octets, administratively assigned Maximum remaining length 27 6-127 - reserved, unused 128-255 - as defined by the enterprise Maximum remaining length 27 " SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(5..32)) Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 43] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002 SnmpSecurityModel ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An identifier that uniquely identifies a Security Model of the Security Subsystem within this SNMP Management Architecture. The values for securityModel are allocated as follows: - The zero value does not identify any particular security model. - Values between 1 and 255, inclusive, are reserved for standards-track Security Models and are managed by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). - Values greater than 255 are allocated to enterprise-specific Security Models. An enterprise-specific securityModel value is defined to be: enterpriseID * 256 + security model within enterprise For example, the fourth Security Model defined by the enterprise whose enterpriseID is 1 would be 259. This scheme for allocation of securityModel values allows for a maximum of 255 standards- based Security Models, and for a maximum of 256 Security Models per enterprise. It is believed that the assignment of new securityModel values will be rare in practice because the larger the number of simultaneously utilized Security Models, the larger the chance that interoperability will suffer. Consequently, it is believed that such a range will be sufficient. In the unlikely event that the standards committee finds this number to be insufficient over time, an enterprise number can be allocated to obtain an additional 256 possible values. Note that the most significant bit must be zero; hence, there are 23 bits allocated for various organizations to design and define non-standard Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 44] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002 securityModels. This limits the ability to define new proprietary implementations of Security Models to the first 8,388,608 enterprises. It is worthwhile to note that, in its encoded form, the securityModel value will normally require only a single byte since, in practice, the leftmost bits will be zero for most messages and sign extension is suppressed by the encoding rules. As of this writing, there are several values of securityModel defined for use with SNMP or reserved for use with supporting MIB objects. They are as follows: 0 reserved for 'any' 1 reserved for SNMPv1 2 reserved for SNMPv2c 3 User-Based Security Model (USM) " SYNTAX INTEGER(0 .. 2147483647) SnmpMessageProcessingModel ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An identifier that uniquely identifies a Message Processing Model of the Message Processing Subsystem within this SNMP Management Architecture. The values for messageProcessingModel are allocated as follows: - Values between 0 and 255, inclusive, are reserved for standards-track Message Processing Models and are managed by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). - Values greater than 255 are allocated to enterprise-specific Message Processing Models. An enterprise messageProcessingModel value is defined to be: enterpriseID * 256 + messageProcessingModel within enterprise For example, the fourth Message Processing Model defined by the enterprise whose enterpriseID Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 45] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002 is 1 would be 259. This scheme for allocating messageProcessingModel values allows for a maximum of 255 standards- based Message Processing Models, and for a maximum of 256 Message Processing Models per enterprise. It is believed that the assignment of new messageProcessingModel values will be rare in practice because the larger the number of simultaneously utilized Message Processing Models, the larger the chance that interoperability will suffer. It is believed that such a range will be sufficient. In the unlikely event that the standards committee finds this number to be insufficient over time, an enterprise number can be allocated to obtain an additional 256 possible values. Note that the most significant bit must be zero; hence, there are 23 bits allocated for various organizations to design and define non-standard messageProcessingModels. This limits the ability to define new proprietary implementations of Message Processing Models to the first 8,388,608 enterprises. It is worthwhile to note that, in its encoded form, the messageProcessingModel value will normally require only a single byte since, in practice, the leftmost bits will be zero for most messages and sign extension is suppressed by the encoding rules. As of this writing, there are several values of messageProcessingModel defined for use with SNMP. They are as follows: 0 reserved for SNMPv1 1 reserved for SNMPv2c 2 reserved for SNMPv2u and SNMPv2* 3 reserved for SNMPv3 " SYNTAX INTEGER(0 .. 2147483647) Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 46] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002 SnmpSecurityLevel ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A Level of Security at which SNMP messages can be sent or with which operations are being processed; in particular, one of: noAuthNoPriv - without authentication and without privacy, authNoPriv - with authentication but without privacy, authPriv - with authentication and with privacy. These three values are ordered such that noAuthNoPriv is less than authNoPriv and authNoPriv is less than authPriv. " SYNTAX INTEGER { noAuthNoPriv(1), authNoPriv(2), authPriv(3) } SnmpAdminString ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "255t" STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An octet string containing administrative information, preferably in human-readable form. To facilitate internationalization, this information is represented using the ISO/IEC IS 10646-1 character set, encoded as an octet string using the UTF-8 transformation format described in [RFC2279]. Since additional code points are added by amendments to the 10646 standard from time to time, implementations must be prepared to encounter any code point from 0x00000000 to 0x7fffffff. Byte sequences that do not correspond to the valid UTF-8 encoding of a code point or are outside this range are prohibited. The use of control codes should be avoided. When it is necessary to represent a newline, the control code sequence CR LF should be used. Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 47] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002 The use of leading or trailing white space should be avoided. For code points not directly supported by user interface hardware or software, an alternative means of entry and display, such as hexadecimal, may be provided. For information encoded in 7-bit US-ASCII, the UTF-8 encoding is identical to the US-ASCII encoding. UTF-8 may require multiple bytes to represent a single character / code point; thus the length of this object in octets may be different from the number of characters encoded. Similarly, size constraints refer to the number of encoded octets, not the number of characters represented by an encoding. Note that when this TC is used for an object that is used or envisioned to be used as an index, then a SIZE restriction MUST be specified so that the number of sub-identifiers for any object instance does not exceed the limit of 128, as defined by [RFC3416]. Note that the size of an SnmpAdminString object is measured in octets, not characters. " SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255)) – Administrative assignments *

snmpFrameworkAdmin

  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpFrameworkMIB 1 }

snmpFrameworkMIBObjects

  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpFrameworkMIB 2 }

snmpFrameworkMIBConformance

  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpFrameworkMIB 3 }

– the snmpEngine Group

snmpEngine OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpFrameworkMIBObjects 1 }

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 48] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

snmpEngineID OBJECT-TYPE

  SYNTAX       SnmpEngineID
  MAX-ACCESS   read-only
  STATUS       current
  DESCRIPTION "An SNMP engine's administratively-unique identifier.
               This information SHOULD be stored in non-volatile
               storage so that it remains constant across
               re-initializations of the SNMP engine.
              "
  ::= { snmpEngine 1 }

snmpEngineBoots OBJECT-TYPE

  SYNTAX       INTEGER (1..2147483647)
  MAX-ACCESS   read-only
  STATUS       current
  DESCRIPTION "The number of times that the SNMP engine has
               (re-)initialized itself since snmpEngineID
               was last configured.
              "
  ::= { snmpEngine 2 }

snmpEngineTime OBJECT-TYPE

  SYNTAX       INTEGER (0..2147483647)
  UNITS        "seconds"
  MAX-ACCESS   read-only
  STATUS       current
  DESCRIPTION "The number of seconds since the value of
               the snmpEngineBoots object last changed.
               When incrementing this object's value would
               cause it to exceed its maximum,
               snmpEngineBoots is incremented as if a
               re-initialization had occurred, and this
               object's value consequently reverts to zero.
              "
  ::= { snmpEngine 3 }

snmpEngineMaxMessageSize OBJECT-TYPE

  SYNTAX       INTEGER (484..2147483647)
  MAX-ACCESS   read-only
  STATUS       current
  DESCRIPTION "The maximum length in octets of an SNMP message
               which this SNMP engine can send or receive and
               process, determined as the minimum of the maximum
               message size values supported among all of the
               transports available to and supported by the engine.
              "
  ::= { snmpEngine 4 }

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 49] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

– Registration Points for Authentication and Privacy Protocols snmpAuthProtocols OBJECT-IDENTITY STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Registration point for standards-track authentication protocols used in SNMP Management Frameworks. " ::= { snmpFrameworkAdmin 1 } snmpPrivProtocols OBJECT-IDENTITY STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Registration point for standards-track privacy protocols used in SNMP Management Frameworks. " ::= { snmpFrameworkAdmin 2 } – Conformance information

snmpFrameworkMIBCompliances

             OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {snmpFrameworkMIBConformance 1}

snmpFrameworkMIBGroups

             OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {snmpFrameworkMIBConformance 2}

– compliance statements

snmpFrameworkMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

  STATUS       current
  DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP engines which
               implement the SNMP Management Framework MIB.
              "
  MODULE    -- this module
      MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpEngineGroup }
  ::= { snmpFrameworkMIBCompliances 1 }

– units of conformance

snmpEngineGroup OBJECT-GROUP

  OBJECTS {
            snmpEngineID,
            snmpEngineBoots,
            snmpEngineTime,
            snmpEngineMaxMessageSize
          }
  STATUS       current
  DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects for identifying and
               determining the configuration and current timeliness

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 50] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

               values of an SNMP engine.
              "
  ::= { snmpFrameworkMIBGroups 1 }

END

6. IANA Considerations

 This document defines three number spaces administered by IANA, one
 for security models, another for message processing models, and a
 third for SnmpEngineID formats.

6.1. Security Models

 The SnmpSecurityModel TEXTUAL-CONVENTION values managed by IANA are
 in the range from 0 to 255 inclusive, and are reserved for
 standards-track Security Models.  If this range should in the future
 prove insufficient, an enterprise number can be allocated to obtain
 an additional 256 possible values.
 As of this writing, there are several values of securityModel defined
 for use with SNMP or reserved for use with supporting MIB objects.
 They are as follows:
                         0  reserved for 'any'
                         1  reserved for SNMPv1
                         2  reserved for SNMPv2c
                         3  User-Based Security Model (USM)

6.2. Message Processing Models

 The SnmpMessageProcessingModel TEXTUAL-CONVENTION values managed by
 IANA are in the range 0 to 255, inclusive.  Each value uniquely
 identifies a standards-track Message Processing Model of the Message
 Processing Subsystem within the SNMP Management Architecture.
 Should this range prove insufficient in the future, an enterprise
 number may be obtained for the standards committee to get an
 additional 256 possible values.
 As of this writing, there are several values of
 messageProcessingModel defined for use with SNMP.  They are as
 follows:
                         0  reserved for SNMPv1
                         1  reserved for SNMPv2c
                         2  reserved for SNMPv2u and SNMPv2*
                         3  reserved for SNMPv3

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 51] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

6.3. SnmpEngineID Formats

 The SnmpEngineID TEXTUAL-CONVENTION's fifth octet contains a format
 identifier.  The values managed by IANA are in the range 6 to 127,
 inclusive.  Each value uniquely identifies a standards-track
 SnmpEngineID format.

7. Intellectual Property

 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
 intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
 might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
 has made any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the
 IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
 standards-related documentation can be found in RFC 2028.  Copies of
 claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
 licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
 obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
 proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
 be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
 rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
 this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive
 Director.

8. Acknowledgements

 This document is the result of the efforts of the SNMPv3 Working
 Group.  Some special thanks are in order to the following SNMPv3 WG
 members:
    Harald Tveit Alvestrand (Maxware)
    Dave Battle (SNMP Research, Inc.)
    Alan Beard (Disney Worldwide Services)
    Paul Berrevoets (SWI Systemware/Halcyon Inc.)
    Martin Bjorklund (Ericsson)
    Uri Blumenthal (IBM T.J. Watson Research Center)
    Jeff Case (SNMP Research, Inc.)
    John Curran (BBN)
    Mike Daniele (Compaq Computer Corporation)
    T. Max Devlin (Eltrax Systems)
    John Flick (Hewlett Packard)
    Rob Frye (MCI)
    Wes Hardaker (U.C.Davis, Information Technology - D.C.A.S.)

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 52] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

    David Harrington (Cabletron Systems Inc.)
    Lauren Heintz (BMC Software, Inc.)
    N.C. Hien (IBM T.J. Watson Research Center)
    Michael Kirkham (InterWorking Labs, Inc.)
    Dave Levi (SNMP Research, Inc.)
    Louis A Mamakos (UUNET Technologies Inc.)
    Joe Marzot (Nortel Networks)
    Paul Meyer (Secure Computing Corporation)
    Keith McCloghrie (Cisco Systems)
    Bob Moore (IBM)
    Russ Mundy (TIS Labs at Network Associates)
    Bob Natale (ACE*COMM Corporation)
    Mike O'Dell (UUNET Technologies Inc.)
    Dave Perkins (DeskTalk)
    Peter Polkinghorne (Brunel University)
    Randy Presuhn (BMC Software, Inc.)
    David Reeder (TIS Labs at Network Associates)
    David Reid (SNMP Research, Inc.)
    Aleksey Romanov (Quality Quorum)
    Shawn Routhier (Epilogue)
    Juergen Schoenwaelder (TU Braunschweig)
    Bob Stewart (Cisco Systems)
    Mike Thatcher (Independent Consultant)
    Bert Wijnen (IBM T.J. Watson Research Center)
 The document is based on recommendations of the IETF Security and
 Administrative Framework Evolution for SNMP Advisory Team.  Members
 of that Advisory Team were:
    David Harrington (Cabletron Systems Inc.)
    Jeff Johnson (Cisco Systems)
    David Levi (SNMP Research Inc.)
    John Linn (Openvision)
    Russ Mundy (Trusted Information Systems) chair
    Shawn Routhier (Epilogue)
    Glenn Waters (Nortel)
    Bert Wijnen (IBM T. J. Watson Research Center)
 As recommended by the Advisory Team and the SNMPv3 Working Group
 Charter, the design incorporates as much as practical from previous
 RFCs and drafts. As a result, special thanks are due to the authors
 of previous designs known as SNMPv2u and SNMPv2*:
    Jeff Case (SNMP Research, Inc.)
    David Harrington (Cabletron Systems Inc.)
    David Levi (SNMP Research, Inc.)
    Keith McCloghrie (Cisco Systems)
    Brian O'Keefe (Hewlett Packard)

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 53] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

    Marshall T. Rose (Dover Beach Consulting)
    Jon Saperia (BGS Systems Inc.)
    Steve Waldbusser (International Network Services)
    Glenn W. Waters (Bell-Northern Research Ltd.)

9. Security Considerations

 This document describes how an implementation can include a Security
 Model to protect management messages and an Access Control Model to
 control access to management information.
 The level of security provided is determined by the specific Security
 Model implementation(s) and the specific Access Control Model
 implementation(s) used.
 Applications have access to data which is not secured.  Applications
 SHOULD take reasonable steps to protect the data from disclosure.
 It is the responsibility of the purchaser of an implementation to
 ensure that:
    1) an implementation complies with the rules defined by this
       architecture,
    2) the Security and Access Control Models utilized satisfy the
       security and access control needs of the organization,
    3) the implementations of the Models and Applications comply with
       the model and application specifications,
    4) and the implementation protects configuration secrets from
       inadvertent disclosure.
 This document also contains a MIB definition module.  None of the
 objects defined is writable, and the information they represent is
 not deemed to be particularly sensitive.  However, if they are deemed
 sensitive in a particular environment, access to them should be
 restricted through the use of appropriately configured Security and
 Access Control models.

10. References

10.1. Normative References

 [RFC2119]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
             Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 54] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 [RFC2279]   Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
             10646", RFC 2279, January 1998.
 [RFC2578]   McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
             Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management
             Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April
             1999.
 [RFC2579]   McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
             Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for
             SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
 [RFC2580]   McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
             Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for
             SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
 [RFC3412]   Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen,
             "Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple
             Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3412,
             December 2002.
 [RFC3413]   Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "Simple Network
             Management Protocol (SNMP) Applications", STD 62, RFC
             3413, December 2002.
 [RFC3414]   Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-Based Security Model
             (USM) for Version 3 of the Simple Network Management
             Protocol (SNMPv3)", STD 62, RFC 3414, December 2002.
 [RFC3415]   Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based
             Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network
             Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3415, December
             2002.
 [RFC3416]   Presuhn, R., Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S.
             Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for the Simple Network
             Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3416, December
             2002.
 [RFC3417]   Presuhn, R., Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S.
             Waldbusser, "Transport Mappings for the Simple Network
             Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3417, December
             2002.
 [RFC3418]   Presuhn, R., Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S.
             Waldbusser, "Management Information Base (MIB) for the
             Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC
             3418, December 2002.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 55] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

10.2. Informative References

 [RFC1155]   Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification
             of Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets",
             STD 16, RFC 1155, May 1990.
 [RFC1157]   Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "The
             Simple Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157,
             May 1990.
 [RFC1212]   Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions",
             STD 16, RFC 1212, March 1991.
 [RFC1901]   Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
             "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901,
             January 1996.
 [RFC1909]   McCloghrie, K., Editor, "An Administrative Infrastructure
             for SNMPv2", RFC 1909, February 1996.
 [RFC1910]   Waters, G., Editor, "User-based Security Model for
             SNMPv2", RFC 1910, February 1996.
 [RFC2028]   Hovey, R. and S. Bradner, "The Organizations Involved in
             the IETF Standards Process", BCP 11, RFC 2028, October
             1996.
 [RFC2576]   Frye, R., Levi, D., Routhier, S. and B. Wijnen,
             "Coexistence between Version 1, Version 2, and Version 3
             of the Internet-Standard Network Management Framework",
             RFC 2576, March 2000.
 [RFC2863]   McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
             MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.
 [RFC3410]   Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart,
             "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
             Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 56] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

Appendix A

A. Guidelines for Model Designers

 This appendix describes guidelines for designers of models which are
 expected to fit into the architecture defined in this document.
 SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c are two SNMP frameworks which use communities to
 provide trivial authentication and access control.  SNMPv1 and
 SNMPv2c Frameworks can coexist with Frameworks designed according to
 this architecture, and modified versions of SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c
 Frameworks could be designed to meet the requirements of this
 architecture, but this document does not provide guidelines for that
 coexistence.
 Within any subsystem model, there should be no reference to any
 specific model of another subsystem, or to data defined by a specific
 model of another subsystem.
 Transfer of data between the subsystems is deliberately described as
 a fixed set of abstract data elements and primitive functions which
 can be overloaded to satisfy the needs of multiple model definitions.
 Documents which define models to be used within this architecture
 SHOULD use the standard primitives between subsystems, possibly
 defining specific mechanisms for converting the abstract data
 elements into model-usable formats.  This constraint exists to allow
 subsystem and model documents to be written recognizing common
 borders of the subsystem and model.  Vendors are not constrained to
 recognize these borders in their implementations.
 The architecture defines certain standard services to be provided
 between subsystems, and the architecture defines abstract service
 interfaces to request these services.
 Each model definition for a subsystem SHOULD support the standard
 service interfaces, but whether, or how, or how well, it performs the
 service is dependent on the model definition.

A.1. Security Model Design Requirements

A.1.1. Threats

 A document describing a Security Model MUST describe how the model
 protects against the threats described under "Security Requirements
 of this Architecture", section 1.4.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 57] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

A.1.2. Security Processing

 Received messages MUST be validated by a Model of the Security
 Subsystem.  Validation includes authentication and privacy processing
 if needed, but it is explicitly allowed to send messages which do not
 require authentication or privacy.
 A received message contains a specified securityLevel to be used
 during processing.  All messages requiring privacy MUST also require
 authentication.
 A Security Model specifies rules by which authentication and privacy
 are to be done.  A model may define mechanisms to provide additional
 security features, but the model definition is constrained to using
 (possibly a subset of) the abstract data elements defined in this
 document for transferring data between subsystems.
 Each Security Model may allow multiple security protocols to be used
 concurrently within an implementation of the model.  Each Security
 Model defines how to determine which protocol to use, given the
 securityLevel and the security parameters relevant to the message.
 Each Security Model, with its associated protocol(s) defines how the
 sending/receiving entities are identified, and how secrets are
 configured.
 Authentication and Privacy protocols supported by Security Models are
 uniquely identified using Object Identifiers.  IETF standard
 protocols for authentication or privacy should have an identifier
 defined within the snmpAuthProtocols or the snmpPrivProtocols
 subtrees.  Enterprise specific protocol identifiers should be defined
 within the enterprise subtree.
 For privacy, the Security Model defines what portion of the message
 is encrypted.
 The persistent data used for security should be SNMP-manageable, but
 the Security Model defines whether an instantiation of the MIB is a
 conformance requirement.
 Security Models are replaceable within the Security Subsystem.
 Multiple Security Model implementations may exist concurrently within
 an SNMP engine.  The number of Security Models defined by the SNMP
 community should remain small to promote interoperability.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 58] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

A.1.3. Validate the security-stamp in a received message

 A Message Processing Model requests that a Security Model:
  1. verifies that the message has not been altered,
  1. authenticates the identification of the principal for whom the

message was generated.

  1. decrypts the message if it was encrypted.
 Additional requirements may be defined by the model, and additional
 services may be provided by the model, but the model is constrained
 to use the following primitives for transferring data between
 subsystems.  Implementations are not so constrained.
 A Message Processing Model uses the processIncomingMsg primitive as
 described in section 4.4.2.

A.1.4. Security MIBs

 Each Security Model defines the MIB module(s) required for security
 processing, including any MIB module(s) required for the security
 protocol(s) supported.  The MIB module(s) SHOULD be defined
 concurrently with the procedures which use the MIB module(s).  The
 MIB module(s) are subject to normal access control rules.
 The mapping between the model-dependent security ID and the
 securityName MUST be able to be determined using SNMP, if the model-
 dependent MIB is instantiated and if access control policy allows
 access.

A.1.5. Cached Security Data

 For each message received, the Security Model caches the state
 information such that a Response message can be generated using the
 same security information, even if the Local Configuration Datastore
 is altered between the time of the incoming request and the outgoing
 response.
 A Message Processing Model has the responsibility for explicitly
 releasing the cached data if such data is no longer needed.  To
 enable this, an abstract securityStateReference data element is
 passed from the Security Model to the Message Processing Model.
 The cached security data may be implicitly released via the
 generation of a response, or explicitly released by using the
 stateRelease primitive, as described in section 4.5.1.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 59] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

A.2. Message Processing Model Design Requirements

 An SNMP engine contains a Message Processing Subsystem which may
 contain multiple Message Processing Models.
 The Message Processing Model MUST always (conceptually) pass the
 complete PDU, i.e., it never forwards less than the complete list of
 varBinds.

A.2.1. Receiving an SNMP Message from the Network

 Upon receipt of a message from the network, the Dispatcher in the
 SNMP engine determines the version of the SNMP message and interacts
 with the corresponding Message Processing Model to determine the
 abstract data elements.
 A Message Processing Model specifies the SNMP Message format it
 supports and describes how to determine the values of the abstract
 data elements (like msgID, msgMaxSize, msgFlags,
 msgSecurityParameters, securityModel, securityLevel etc).  A Message
 Processing Model interacts with a Security Model to provide security
 processing for the message using the processIncomingMsg primitive, as
 described in section 4.4.2.

A.2.2. Sending an SNMP Message to the Network

 The Dispatcher in the SNMP engine interacts with a Message Processing
 Model to prepare an outgoing message.  For that it uses the following
 primitives:
  1. for requests and notifications: prepareOutgoingMessage, as

described in section 4.2.1.

  1. for response messages: prepareResponseMessage, as described in

section 4.2.2.

 A Message Processing Model, when preparing an Outgoing SNMP Message,
 interacts with a Security Model to secure the message.  For that it
 uses the following primitives:
  1. for requests and notifications: generateRequestMsg, as

described in section 4.4.1.

  1. for response messages: generateResponseMsg as described in

section 4.4.3.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 60] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

 Once the SNMP message is prepared by a Message Processing Model, the
 Dispatcher sends the message to the desired address using the
 appropriate transport.

A.3. Application Design Requirements

 Within an application, there may be an explicit binding to a specific
 SNMP message version, i.e., a specific Message Processing Model, and
 to a specific Access Control Model, but there should be no reference
 to any data defined by a specific Message Processing Model or Access
 Control Model.
 Within an application, there should be no reference to any specific
 Security Model, or any data defined by a specific Security Model.
 An application determines whether explicit or implicit access control
 should be applied to the operation, and, if access control is needed,
 which Access Control Model should be used.
 An application has the responsibility to define any MIB module(s)
 used to provide application-specific services.
 Applications interact with the SNMP engine to initiate messages,
 receive responses, receive asynchronous messages, and send responses.

A.3.1. Applications that Initiate Messages

 Applications may request that the SNMP engine send messages
 containing SNMP commands or notifications using the sendPdu primitive
 as described in section 4.1.1.
 If it is desired that a message be sent to multiple targets, it is
 the responsibility of the application to provide the iteration.
 The SNMP engine assumes necessary access control has been applied to
 the PDU, and provides no access control services.
 The SNMP engine looks at the "expectResponse" parameter, and if a
 response is expected, then the appropriate information is cached such
 that a later response can be associated to this message, and can then
 be returned to the application.  A sendPduHandle is returned to the
 application so it can later correspond the response with this message
 as well.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 61] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

A.3.2. Applications that Receive Responses

 The SNMP engine matches the incoming response messages to outstanding
 messages sent by this SNMP engine, and forwards the response to the
 associated application using the processResponsePdu primitive, as
 described in section 4.1.4.

A.3.3. Applications that Receive Asynchronous Messages

 When an SNMP engine receives a message that is not the response to a
 request from this SNMP engine, it must determine to which application
 the message should be given.
 An Application that wishes to receive asynchronous messages registers
 itself with the engine using the primitive registerContextEngineID as
 described in section 4.1.5.
 An Application that wishes to stop receiving asynchronous messages
 should unregister itself with the SNMP engine using the primitive
 unregisterContextEngineID as described in section 4.1.5.
 Only one registration per combination of PDU type and contextEngineID
 is permitted at the same time.  Duplicate registrations are ignored.
 An errorIndication will be returned to the application that attempts
 to duplicate a registration.
 All asynchronously received messages containing a registered
 combination of PDU type and contextEngineID are sent to the
 application which registered to support that combination.
 The engine forwards the PDU to the registered application, using the
 processPdu primitive, as described in section 4.1.2.

A.3.4. Applications that Send Responses

 Request operations require responses.  An application sends a
 response via the returnResponsePdu primitive, as described in section
 4.1.3.
 The contextEngineID, contextName, securityModel, securityName,
 securityLevel, and stateReference parameters are from the initial
 processPdu primitive.  The PDU and statusInformation are the results
 of processing.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 62] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

A.4. Access Control Model Design Requirements

 An Access Control Model determines whether the specified securityName
 is allowed to perform the requested operation on a specified managed
 object.  The Access Control Model specifies the rules by which access
 control is determined.
 The persistent data used for access control should be manageable
 using SNMP, but the Access Control Model defines whether an
 instantiation of the MIB is a conformance requirement.
 The Access Control Model must provide the primitive isAccessAllowed.

Editors' Addresses

 Bert Wijnen
 Lucent Technologies
 Schagen 33
 3461 GL Linschoten
 Netherlands
 Phone: +31 348-680-485
 EMail: bwijnen@lucent.com
 David Harrington
 Enterasys Networks
 Post Office Box 5005
 35 Industrial Way
 Rochester, New Hampshire 03866-5005
 USA
 Phone: +1 603-337-2614
 EMail: dbh@enterasys.com
 Randy Presuhn
 BMC Software, Inc.
 2141 North First Street
 San Jose, California 95131
 USA
 Phone: +1 408-546-1006
 Fax: +1 408-965-0359
 EMail: randy_presuhn@bmc.com

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 63] RFC 3411 Architecture for SNMP Management Frameworks December 2002

Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.
 This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
 others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
 or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
 and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
 kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
 included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
 document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
 the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
 Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
 developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
 copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
 followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
 English.
 The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
 revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
 This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
 TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
 BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
 HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

 Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 Internet Society.

Harrington, et al. Standards Track [Page 64]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc3411.txt · Last modified: 2002/12/19 19:03 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki