GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc2698

Network Working Group J. Heinanen Request for Comments: 2698 Telia Finland Category: Informational R. Guerin

                                            University of Pennsylvania
                                                        September 1999
                   A Two Rate Three Color Marker

Status of this Memo

 This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
 not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
 memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

 This document defines a Two Rate Three Color Marker (trTCM), which
 can be used as a component in a Diffserv traffic conditioner
 [RFC2475, RFC2474].  The trTCM meters an IP packet stream and marks
 its packets based on two rates, Peak Information Rate (PIR) and
 Committed Information Rate (CIR), and their associated burst sizes to
 be either green, yellow, or red.  A packet is marked red if it
 exceeds the PIR.  Otherwise it is marked either yellow or green
 depending on whether it exceeds or doesn't exceed the CIR.

1. Introduction

 The Two Rate Three Color Marker (trTCM) meters an IP packet stream
 and marks its packets either green, yellow, or red.  A packet is
 marked red if it exceeds the Peak Information Rate (PIR).  Otherwise
 it is marked either yellow or green depending on whether it exceeds
 or doesn't exceed the Committed Information Rate (CIR).  The trTCM is
 useful, for example, for ingress policing of a service, where a peak
 rate needs to be enforced separately from a committed rate.

Heinanen & Guerin Informational [Page 1] RFC 2698 A Two Rate Three Color Marker September 1999

 The Meter meters each packet and passes the packet and the metering
 result to the Marker:
                          +------------+
                          |   Result   |
                          |            V
                      +-------+    +--------+
                      |       |    |        |
    Packet Stream ===>| Meter |===>| Marker |===> Marked Packet Stream
                      |       |    |        |
                      +-------+    +--------+
 The Meter operates in one of two modes.  In the Color-Blind mode, the
 Meter assumes that the packet stream is uncolored.  In the Color-
 Aware mode the Meter assumes that some preceding entity has pre-
 colored the incoming packet stream so that each packet is either
 green, yellow, or red.  The details of the pre-coloring process,
 including handling of error scenarios, and how the Meter determines
 the color of a pre-colored packet are DS domain specific and outside
 the scope of this document.
 The Marker (re)colors an IP packet according to the results of the
 Meter.  The color is coded in the DS field [RFC2474] of the packet in
 a PHB specific manner (see section 4 for an example).
 A companion document [RFC2697] describes another three color marker,
 called a Single Rate Three Color Maker (srTCM), where packets are
 marked based on a single rate and two burst sizes.

2. Configuration

 The trTCM is configured by setting its mode and by assigning values
 to four traffic parameters: a Peak Information Rate (PIR) and its
 associated Peak Burst Size (PBS) and a Committed Information Rate
 (CIR) and its associated Committed Burst Size (CBS).
 The PIR and CIR are measured in bytes of IP packets per second, i.e.,
 it includes the IP header, but not link specific headers.  The PIR
 must be equal to or greater than the CIR.
 The PBS and the CBS and are measured in bytes and both of them must
 be configured to be greater than 0.  It is recommended that they be
 configured to be equal to or greater than the size of the largest
 possible IP packet in the stream.

Heinanen & Guerin Informational [Page 2] RFC 2698 A Two Rate Three Color Marker September 1999

3. Metering

 The behavior of the Meter is specified in terms of its mode and two
 token buckets, P and C, with rates PIR and CIR, respectively.  The
 maximum size of the token bucket P is PBS and the maximum size of the
 token bucket C is CBS.
 The token buckets P and C are initially (at time 0) full, i.e., the
 token count Tp(0) = PBS and the token count Tc(0) = CBS.  Thereafter,
 the token count Tp is incremented by one PIR times per second up to
 PBS and the token count Tc is incremented by one CIR times per second
 up to CBS.
 When a packet of size B bytes arrives at time t, the following
 happens if the trTCM is configured to operate in the Color-Blind
 mode:
   o If Tp(t)-B < 0, the packet is red, else
   o if Tc(t)-B < 0, the packet is yellow and Tp is decremented by B,
     else
   o the packet is green and both Tp and Tc are decremented by B.
 When a packet of size B bytes arrives at time t, the following
 happens if the trTCM is configured to operate in the Color-Aware
 mode:
   o If the packet has been precolored as red or if Tp(t)-B < 0, the
     packet is red, else
   o if the packet has been precolored as yellow or if Tc(t)-B < 0,
     the packet is yellow and Tp is decremented by B, else
   o the packet is green and both Tp and Tc are decremented by B.
 The actual implementation of a Meter doesn't need to be modeled
 according to the above formal specification.

4. Marking

 The Marker reflects the metering result by setting the DS field of
 the packet to a particular codepoint.  In case of the AF PHB
 [RFC2597], the color can be coded as the drop precedence of the
 packet.

Heinanen & Guerin Informational [Page 3] RFC 2698 A Two Rate Three Color Marker September 1999

5. Service Example

 The trTCM can be used to mark a IP packet stream in a service, where
 different, decreasing levels of assurances (either absolute or
 relative) are given to packets which are green, yellow, or red.  For
 example, a service may discard all red packets, because they exceeded
 the peak rate, forward yellow packets as best effort, and forward
 green packets with a low drop probability.

6. Security Considerations

 The trTCM has no known security concerns.

7. References

 [RFC2697] Heinanen, J. and R. Guerin, "A Single Rate Three Color
             Marker", RFC 2697, September 1999.
 [RFC2597] Heinanen, J., Baker, F., Weiss, W. and J. Wroclawski,
             "Assured Forwarding PHB Group", RFC 2597, June 1999.
 [RFC2474]   Nichols, K., Blake, S., Baker, F. and D. Black,
             "Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS
             Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers", RFC 2474, December
             1998.
 [RFC2475]   Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z
             and W. Weiss, "An Architecture for Differentiated
             Services",  RFC 2475, December 1998.

8. Authors' Addresses

 Juha Heinanen
 Telia Finland, Inc.
 Myyrmaentie 2
 01600 Vantaa, Finland
 EMail: jh@telia.fi
 Roch Guerin
 University of Pennsylvania
 Department of Electrical Engineering, Rm 367 GRW
 200 South 33rd Street
 Philadelphia, PA 19104
 EMail: guerin@ee.upenn.edu

Heinanen & Guerin Informational [Page 4] RFC 2698 A Two Rate Three Color Marker September 1999

9. Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.
 This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
 others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
 or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
 and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
 kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
 included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
 document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
 the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
 Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
 developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
 copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
 followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
 English.
 The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
 revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
 This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
 TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
 BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
 HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

 Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 Internet Society.

Heinanen & Guerin Informational [Page 5]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc2698.txt · Last modified: 1999/09/14 22:10 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki