GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc2247

Network Working Group S. Kille Request for Comments: 2247 Isode Ltd. Category: Standards Track M. Wahl

                                                   Critical Angle Inc.
                                                           A. Grimstad
                                                                  AT&T
                                                              R. Huber
                                                                  AT&T
                                                           S. Sataluri
                                                                  AT&T
                                                          January 1998
          Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished Names

Status of this Memo

 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998).  All Rights Reserved.

1. Abstract

 The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) uses X.500-
 compatible distinguished names [3] for providing unique
 identification of entries.
 This document defines an algorithm by which a name registered with
 the Internet Domain Name Service [2] can be represented as an LDAP
 distinguished name.

2. Background

 The Domain (Nameserver) System (DNS) provides a hierarchical resource
 labeling system.   A name is made up of an ordered set of components,
 each of which are short strings. An example domain name with two
 components would be "CRITICAL-ANGLE.COM".

Kille, et. al. Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 2247 Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 January 1998

 LDAP-based directories provide a more general hierarchical naming
 framework. A primary difference in specification of distinguished
 names from domain names is that each component of an distinguished
 name has an explicit attribute type indication.
 X.500 does not mandate any particular naming structure.  It does
 contain suggested naming structures which are based on geographic and
 national regions, however there is not currently an established
 registration infrastructure in many regions which would be able to
 assign or ensure uniqueness of names.
 The mechanism described in this document automatically provides an
 enterprise a distinguished name for each domain name it has obtained
 for use in the Internet.  These distinguished names may be used to
 identify objects in an LDAP directory.
 An example distinguished name represented in the LDAP string format
 [3] is "DC=CRITICAL-ANGLE,DC=COM".  As with a domain name, the most
 significant component, closest to the root of the namespace, is
 written last.
 This document does not define how to represent objects which do not
 have domain names.  Nor does this document define the procedure to
 locate an enterprise's LDAP directory server, given their domain
 name.  Such procedures may be defined in future RFCs.

3. Mapping Domain Names into Distinguished Names

 This section defines a subset of the possible distinguished name
 structures for use in representing names allocated in the Internet
 Domain Name System.  It is possible to algorithmically transform any
 Internet domain name into a distinguished name, and to convert these
 distinguished names back into the original domain names.
 The algorithm for transforming a domain name is to begin with an
 empty distinguished name (DN) and then attach Relative Distinguished
 Names (RDNs) for each component of the domain, most significant (e.g.
 rightmost) first. Each of these RDNs is a single
 AttributeTypeAndValue, where the type is the attribute "DC" and the
 value is an IA5 string containing the domain name component.
 Thus the domain name "CS.UCL.AC.UK" can be transformed into
      DC=CS,DC=UCL,DC=AC,DC=UK

Kille, et. al. Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 2247 Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 January 1998

 Distinguished names in which there are one or more RDNs, all
 containing only the attribute type DC, can be mapped back into domain
 names. Note that this document does not define a domain name
 equivalence for any other distinguished names.

4. Attribute Type Definition

 The DC (short for domainComponent) attribute type is defined as
 follows:
  ( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25 NAME 'dc' EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match
   SUBSTR caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch
   SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 SINGLE-VALUE )
 The value of this attribute is a string holding one component of a
 domain name.  The encoding of IA5String for use in LDAP is simply the
 characters of the string itself.  The equality matching rule is case
 insensitive, as is today's DNS.

5. Object Class Definitions

 An object with a name derived from its domain name using the
 algorithm of section 3 is represented as an entry in the directory.
 The "DC" attribute is present in the entry and used as the RDN.
 An attribute can only be present in an entry held by an LDAP server
 when that attribute is permitted by the entry's object class.
 This section defines two object classes.  The first, dcObject, is
 intended to be used in entries for which there is an appropriate
 structural object class.  For example, if the domain represents a
 particular organization, the entry would have as its structural
 object class 'organization', and the 'dcObject' class would be an
 auxiliary class.  The second, domain, is a structural object class
 used for entries in which no other information is being stored. The
 domain object class is typically used for entries that are
 placeholders or whose domains do not correspond to real-world
 entities.

5.1. The dcObject object class

 The dcObject object class permits the dc attribute to be present in
 an entry.  This object class is defined as auxiliary, as it would
 typically be used in conjunction with an existing structural object
 class, such as organization, organizationalUnit or locality.
 The following object class, along with the dc attribute, can be added
 to any entry.

Kille, et. al. Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 2247 Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 January 1998

 ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.344 NAME 'dcObject' SUP top AUXILIARY MUST dc )
 An example entry would be:
 dn: dc=critical-angle,dc=com
 objectClass: top
 objectClass: organization
 objectClass: dcObject
 dc: critical-angle
 o: Critical Angle Inc.

5.2. The domain object class

 If the entry does not correspond to an organization, organizational
 unit or other type of object for which an object class has been
 defined, then the "domain" object class can be used.  The "domain"
 object class requires that the "DC" attribute be present, and permits
 several other attributes to be present in the entry.
 The entry will have as its structural object class the "domain"
 object class.

( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.13 NAME 'domain' SUP top STRUCTURAL MUST dc MAY ( userPassword $ searchGuide $ seeAlso $ businessCategory $ x121Address $ registeredAddress $ destinationIndicator $ preferredDeliveryMethod $ telexNumber $ teletexTerminalIdentifier $ telephoneNumber $ internationaliSDNNumber $ facsimileTelephoneNumber $ street $ postOfficeBox $ postalCode $ postalAddress $ physicalDeliveryOfficeName $ st $ l $ description $ o $ associatedName ) )

 The optional attributes of the domain class are used for describing
 the object represented by this domain, and may also be useful when
 searching.  These attributes are already defined for use with LDAP
 [4].
 An example entry would be:
 dn: dc=tcp,dc=critical-angle,dc=com
 objectClass: top
 objectClass: domain
 dc: tcp
 description: a placeholder entry used with SRV records
 The DC attribute is used for naming entries of the domain class, and
 this can be represented in X.500 servers by the following name form
 rule.

Kille, et. al. Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 2247 Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 January 1998

  ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.345 NAME 'domainNameForm' OC domain MUST ( dc ) )

6. References

 [1] The Directory: Selected Attribute Types. ITU-T Recommendation
     X.520, 1993.
 [2] Mockapetris, P., " Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities,"
     STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
 [3] Kille, S., and M. Wahl, " Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
     (v3): UTF-8 String Representation of Distinguished Names", RFC
     2253, December 1997.
 [4] Wahl, M., "A Summary of the X.500(96) User Schema for use with
     LDAP", RFC 2256, December 1997.

7. Security Considerations

 This memo describes how attributes of objects may be discovered and
 retrieved.  Servers should ensure that an appropriate security policy
 is maintained.
 An enterprise is not restricted in the information which it may store
 in DNS or LDAP servers.  A client which contacts an untrusted server
 may have incorrect or misleading information returned (e.g. an
 organization's server may claim to hold naming contexts representing
 domain names which have not been delegated to that organization).

8. Authors' Addresses

 Steve Kille
 Isode Ltd.
 The Dome
 The Square
 Richmond, Surrey
 TW9 1DT
 England
 Phone:  +44-181-332-9091
 EMail:  S.Kille@ISODE.COM

Kille, et. al. Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 2247 Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 January 1998

 Mark Wahl
 Critical Angle Inc.
 4815 W. Braker Lane #502-385
 Austin, TX 78759
 USA
 Phone:  (1) 512 372 3160
 EMail:  M.Wahl@critical-angle.com
 Al Grimstad
 AT&T
 Room 1C-429, 101 Crawfords Corner Road
 Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030
 USA
 EMail: alg@att.com
 Rick Huber
 AT&T
 Room 1B-433, 101 Crawfords Corner Road
 Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030
 USA
 EMail: rvh@att.com
 Sri Sataluri
 AT&T
 Room 4G-202, 101 Crawfords Corner Road
 Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030
 USA
 EMail: sri@att.com

Kille, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 2247 Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 January 1998

9. Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998).  All Rights Reserved.
 This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
 others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
 or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
 and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
 kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
 included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
 document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
 the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
 Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
 developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
 copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
 followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
 English.
 The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
 revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
 This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
 TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
 BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
 HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Kille, et. al. Standards Track [Page 7]

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/rfc/rfc2247.txt · Last modified: 1998/01/08 00:08 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki