GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc1764

Network Working Group S. Senum Request for Comments: 1764 DigiBoard Category: Standards Track March 1995

              The PPP XNS IDP Control Protocol (XNSCP)

Status of this Memo

 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

 The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method for
 transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links.  PPP
 defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of
 Network Control Protocols for establishing and configuring different
 network-layer protocols.
 This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing
 and configuring the Xerox Network Systems (XNS) Internet Datagram
 Protocol (IDP) over PPP.

Table of Contents

 1.     Introduction ..........................................    2
    1.1       Specification of Requirements ...................    2
    1.2       Terminology .....................................    3
 2.     A PPP Network Control Protocol for XNS IDP ............    3
    2.1       Sending XNS IDP Datagrams .......................    4
 SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS ......................................    5
 REFERENCES ...................................................    5
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..........................................    5
 CHAIR'S ADDRESS ..............................................    5
 AUTHOR'S ADDRESS .............................................    5

Senum [Page 1] RFC 1764 PPP XNSCP March 1995

1. Introduction

 PPP has three main components:
    1. A method for encapsulating multi-protocol datagrams.
    2. A Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring,
       and testing the data-link connection.
    3. A family of Network Control Protocols for establishing and
       configuring different network-layer protocols.
 In order to establish communications over a point-to-point link, each
 end of the PPP link must first send LCP packets to configure and test
 the data link.  After the link has been established and optional
 facilities have been negotiated as needed by the LCP, PPP must send
 XNSCP packets to choose and configure the XNS IDP network-layer
 protocol.  Once XNSCP has reached the Opened state, XNS IDP datagrams
 can be sent over the link.
 The link will remain configured for communications until explicit LCP
 or XNSCP packets close the link down, or until some external event
 occurs (an inactivity timer expires or network administrator
 intervention).

1.1. Specification of Requirements

 In this document, several words are used to signify the requirements
 of the specification.  These words are often capitalized.
 MUST      This word, or the adjective "required", means that the
           definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.
 MUST NOT  This phrase means that the definition is an absolute
           prohibition of the specification.
 SHOULD    This word, or the adjective "recommended", means that there
           may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to
           ignore this item, but the full implications must be
           understood and carefully weighed before choosing a
           different course.
 MAY       This word, or the adjective "optional", means that this
           item is one of an allowed set of alternatives.  An
           implementation which does not include this option MUST be
           prepared to interoperate with another implementation which
           does include the option.

Senum [Page 2] RFC 1764 PPP XNSCP March 1995

1.2. Terminology

 This document frequently uses the following terms:
 datagram  The unit of transmission in the network layer (such as IP).
           A datagram may be encapsulated in one or more packets
           passed to the data link layer.
 frame     The unit of transmission at the data link layer.  A frame
           may include a header and/or a trailer, along with some
           number of units of data.
 packet    The basic unit of encapsulation, which is passed across the
           interface between the network layer and the data link
           layer.  A packet is usually mapped to a frame; the
           exceptions are when data link layer fragmentation is being
           performed, or when multiple packets are incorporated into a
           single frame.
 peer      The other end of the point-to-point link.
 silently discard
           This means the implementation discards the packet without
           further processing.  The implementation SHOULD provide the
           capability of logging the error, including the contents of
           the silently discarded packet, and SHOULD record the event
           in a statistics counter.

2. A PPP Network Control Protocol for XNS IDP

 The XNS IDP Control Protocol (XNSCP) is responsible for configuring,
 enabling, and disabling the XNS IDP protocol modules on both ends of
 the point-to-point link.  XNSCP uses the same packet exchange
 mechanism as the Link Control Protocol (LCP).  XNSCP packets may not
 be exchanged until PPP has reached the Network-Layer Protocol phase.
 XNSCP packets received before this phase is reached should be
 silently discarded.
 The XNS IDP Control Protocol is exactly the same as the Link Control
 Protocol [1] with the following exceptions:
 Frame Modifications
    The packet may utilize any modifications to the basic frame format
    which have been negotiated during the Link Establishment phase.

Senum [Page 3] RFC 1764 PPP XNSCP March 1995

 Data Link Layer Protocol Field
    Exactly one XNSCP packet is encapsulated in the Information field
    of a PPP Data Link Layer frame, where the PPP Protocol field
    indicates type hex 8025 (XNS IDP Control Protocol).
 Code field
    Only Codes 1 through 7 (Configure-Request, Configure-Ack,
    Configure-Nak, Configure-Reject, Terminate-Request, Terminate-Ack
    and Code-Reject) are used.  Other Codes should be treated as
    unrecognized and should result in Code-Rejects.
 Timeouts
    XNSCP packets may not be exchanged until PPP has reached the
    Network-Layer Protocol phase.  An implementation should be
    prepared to wait for Authentication and Link Quality Determination
    to finish before timing out waiting for a Configure-Ack or other
    response.  It is suggested that an implementation give up only
    after user intervention or a configurable amount of time.
 Configuration Option Types
    XNSCP has no Configuration Options.

2.1. Sending XNS IDP Datagrams

 Before any XNS IDP packets may be communicated, PPP must reach the
 Network-Layer Protocol phase, and the XNS IDP Control Protocol must
 reach the Opened state.
 Exactly one XNS IDP packet is encapsulated in the Information field
 of a PPP Data Link Layer frame where the Protocol field indicates
 type hex 0025 (XNS IDP datagram).
 The maximum length of a XNS IDP datagram transmitted over a PPP link
 is the same as the maximum length of the Information field of a PPP
 data link layer frame.  Since there is no standard method for
 fragmenting and reassembling XNS IDP datagrams, PPP links supporting
 XNS IDP MUST allow at least 576 octets in the information field of a
 data link layer frame.
 The format of the Information field itself is the same as that
 defined in [2].

Senum [Page 4] RFC 1764 PPP XNSCP March 1995

Security Considerations

 Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

References

 [1] Simpson, W., "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", STD 51, RFC
     1661, Daydreamer, July 1994.
 [2] Xerox, "Internet Transport Protocols", January 1991, Order No.
     XNSS 029101.

Acknowledgements

 Some of the text in this document is taken from previous documents
 produced by the Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group of the Internet
 Engineering Task Force (IETF).
 In particular, Bill Simpson provided the boiler-plate used to create
 this document.

Chair's Address

 The working group can be contacted via the current chair:
 Fred Baker
 Cisco Systems
 519 Lado Drive
 Santa Barbara, California 93111
 Phone: (805) 681-0115
 EMail: fred@cisco.com

Author's Address

 Questions about this memo can also be directed to:
 Steven J. Senum
 DigiBoard
 6400 Flying Cloud Drive
 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
 Phone: (612) 943-9020
 EMail: sjs@digibd.com

Senum [Page 5]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc1764.txt · Last modified: 1995/02/28 20:34 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki