GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc1393

Network Working Group G. Malkin Request for Comments: 1393 Xylogics, Inc.

                                                          January 1993
                   Traceroute Using an IP Option

Status of this Memo

 This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
 community.  Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
 Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol
 Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.
 Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

 Traceroute serves as a valuable network debugging tool.  The way in
 which it is currently implemented has the advantage of being
 automatically supported by all of the routers.  It's two problems are
 the number of packets it generates and the amount of time it takes to
 run.
 This document specifies a new IP option and ICMP message type which
 duplicates the functionality of the existing traceroute method while
 generating fewer packets and completing in a shorter time.

Table of Contents

 1.  Traceroute Today  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 2.  Traceroute Tomorrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 2.1 Basic Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 2.2 IP Traceroute option format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 2.3 ICMP Traceroute message format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 3.  Protocol  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
 3.1 Hop Counts  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
 3.2 Destination Node Operation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
 3.3 Router Operation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
 4.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
 5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
 6.  Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Malkin [Page 1] RFC 1393 Traceroute January 1993

1. Traceroute Today

 The existing traceroute operates by sending out a packet with a Time
 To Live (TTL) of 1.  The first hop then sends back an ICMP [1] error
 message indicating that the packet could not be forwarded because the
 TTL expired.  The packet is then resent with a TTL of 2, and the
 second hop returns the TTL expired.  This process continues until the
 destination is reached.  The purpose behind this is to record the
 source of each ICMP TTL exceeded message to provide a trace of the
 path the packet took to reach the destination.
 The advantage of this algorithm, is that every router already has the
 ability to send TTL exceeded messages.  No special code is required.
 The disadvantages are the number of packets generated (2n, where n is
 the number of hops), the time it takes to duplicate all the nearer
 hops with each successive packet, and the fact that the path may
 change during this process.  Also, this algorithm does not trace the
 return path, which may differ from the outbound path.

2. Traceroute Tomorrow

 The proposed traceroute would use a different algorithm to achieve
 the same goal, namely, to trace the path to a host.  Because the new
 traceroute uses an ICMP message designed for the purpose, additional
 information, unavailable to the original traceroute user, can be made
 available.

2.1 Basic Algorithm

 A new IP Traceroute option will be defined.  The presence of this
 option in an ICMP Echo (or any other) packet, hereinafter referred to
 as the Outbound Packet, will cause a router to send the newly defined
 ICMP Traceroute message to the originator of the Outbound Packet.  In
 this way, the path of the Outbound Packet will be logged by the
 originator with only n+1 (instead of 2n) packets.  This algorithm
 does not suffer from a changing path and allows the response to the
 Outbound Packet, hereinafter refered to as the Return Packet, to be
 traced (provided the Outbound Packet's destination preserves the IP
 Traceroute option in the Return Packet).
 The disadvantage of this method is that the traceroute function will
 have to be put into the routers.  To counter this disadvantage,
 however, is the fact that this mechanism may be easily ported to a
 new IP version.

Malkin [Page 2] RFC 1393 Traceroute January 1993

2.2 IP Traceroute option format

  0               8              16              24
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 |F| C |  Number |    Length     |          ID Number            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 |      Outbound Hop Count       |       Return Hop Count        |
 +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 |                     Originator IP Address                     |
 +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 F (copy to fragments)
    0 (do not copy to fragments)
 C (class)
    2 (Debugging & Measurement)
 Number
    18 (F+C+Number = 82)
 ID Number
    An arbitrary number used by the originator of the Outbound Packet
    to identify the ICMP Traceroute messages.  It is NOT related to
    the ID number in the IP header.
 Originator IP Address
    The IP address of the originator of the Outbound Packet.  This is
    needed so the routers know where to send the ICMP Traceroute
    message for Return Packets.  It is also needed for Outbound
    Packets which have a Source Route option.
 Outbound Hop Count (OHC)
    The number of routers through which the Outbound Packet has
    passed.  This field is not incremented by the Outbound Packet's
    destination.
 Return Hop Count (RHC)
    The number of routers through which the Return Packet has passed.
    This field is not incremented by the Return Packet's destination.

Malkin [Page 3] RFC 1393 Traceroute January 1993

2.3 ICMP Traceroute message format

  0               8              16              24
 +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 |     Type      |     Code      |           Checksum            |
 +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 |           ID Number           |            unused             |
 +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 |      Outbound Hop Count       |       Return Hop Count        |
 +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 |                       Output Link Speed                       |
 +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 |                        Output Link MTU                        |
 +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 Type
    30
 Code
    0 - Outbound Packet successfully forwarded
    1 - No route for Outbound Packet; packet discarded
 Checksum
    The 16 bit one's complement of the one's complement sum of all 16
    bit words in the header.  For computing the checksum, the checksum
    field should be zero.
 ID Number
    The ID Number as copied from the IP Traceroute option of the
    packet which caused this Traceroute message to be sent.  This is
    NOT related to the ID number in the IP header.
 Outbound Hop Count
    The Outbound Hop Count as copied from the IP Traceroute option of
    the packet which caused this Traceroute message to be sent.
 Return Hop Count
    The Return Hop Count as copied from the IP Traceroute option of
    the packet which caused this Traceroute message to be sent.

Malkin [Page 4] RFC 1393 Traceroute January 1993

 Output Link Speed
    The speed, in OCTETS per second, of the link over which the
    Outbound/Return Packet will be sent.  Since it will not be long
    before network speeds exceed 4.3Gb/s, and since some machines deal
    poorly with fields longer than 32 bits, octets per second was
    chosen over bits per second.  If this value cannot be determined,
    the field should be set to zero.
 Output Link MTU
    The MTU, in bytes, of the link over which the Outbound/Return
    Packet will be sent.  MTU refers to the data portion (includes IP
    header; excludes datalink header/trailer) of the packet.  If this
    value cannot be determined, the field should be set to zero.

3. Protocol

 The Outbound Packet which is used to carry the IP Traceroute option
 should use no special Type Of Service (TOS) or Precedence, unless the
 purpose is to trace the path of packets with special TOS or
 Precedence values.
 The TTL of the Outbound Packet should be set to the default value
 specified in "Assigned Numbers" [2].

3.1 Hop Counts

 The hop counts ultimately provide information on the length of the
 outbound and return paths to the destination.  They also provide a
 means of determining whether or not any ICMP Traceroute messages have
 been lost.  For example, if a Traceroute message with an OHC of 4 is
 followed by a message with an OHC of 6, then the the message with an
 OHC of 5 was lost.  This is why simply counting Traceroute messages
 is not sufficient for determining path length.
 The originator of the Outbound Packet should set the OHC to zero and
 the RHC to 0xFFFF.  0xFFFF is a special value which indicates to
 routers that the packet is an Outbound Packet rather than a Return
 Packet (which begins with an RHC of zero).
 It is important to note that the Traceroute hop counts are NOT
 related to the IP TTL.  A hop count should only be incremented when
 an ICMP Traceroute message is sent.

Malkin [Page 5] RFC 1393 Traceroute January 1993

3.2 Destination Node Operation

 When a node receives an Outbound Packet with an IP Traceroute option,
 the Return Packet, if such is required (e.g., ICMP Echo
 Request/Reply), should also carry that option.  The values in the ID
 Number, OHC, and Originator Address fields should be copied into the
 Return Packet.  The value of the RHC field should be set to zero.
 The destination should NOT increment any hop counts or send any ICMP
 Traceroute messages.

3.3 Router Operation

 When a router forwards a packet with an IP Traceroute option, it
 should send an ICMP Traceroute message to the host in the Originator
 IP Address field of the option.  If the value of the RHC field is
 0xFFFF then the packet is an Outbound Packet and the OHC should be
 incremented; otherwise, the RHC field should be incremented.  The
 Traceroute message should reflect the incremented hop count.  The
 Output Link Speed field should be set to the speed, in OCTETS per
 second, of the link over which the Outbound/Return Packet will be
 sent (e.g., 1,250,000 for an Ethernet) or zero if the output link
 speed cannot be determined.  The Output Link MTU field should be set
 to the MTU of the link over which the Outbound/Return Packet will be
 sent or zero if the MTU cannot be determined.
 The Outbound/Return Packet should be forwarded as though the
 Traceroute option did not exist; that is, it should take the same
 path to the destination as an optionless packet.
 The ICMP Traceroute message should have the same TOS and Precedence
 values as the Outbound/Return Packet.  The TTL should be set to the
 default defined in "Assigned Numbers".
 The ICMP Traceroute message should not carry the IP Traceroute
 option.
 If the Outbound Packet cannot be forwarded, the ICMP Traceroute
 message should have a Code value of 1.  If the Return Packet cannot
 be forwarded because there is no route, then there is no need to send
 a Traceroute message since it could not be forwarded either.

Malkin [Page 6] RFC 1393 Traceroute January 1993

4. References

 [1] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD 5, RFC 792,
     USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
 [2] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, RFC 1340,
     USC/Information Sciences Institute, July 1992.

5. Security Considerations

 Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

6. Author's Address

 Gary Scott Malkin
 Xylogics, Inc.
 53 Third Avenue
 Burlington, MA 01803
 Phone:  (617) 272-8140
 EMail:  gmalkin@Xylogics.COM

Malkin [Page 7]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc1393.txt · Last modified: 1993/01/07 21:11 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki