GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc8956



Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) C. Loibl, Ed. Request for Comments: 8956 next layer Telekom GmbH Updates: 8955 R. Raszuk, Ed. Category: Standards Track NTT Network Innovations ISSN: 2070-1721 S. Hares, Ed.

                                                                Huawei
                                                         December 2020
         Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for IPv6

Abstract

 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules" (RFC 8955) provides a
 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) extension for the propagation of
 traffic flow information for the purpose of rate limiting or
 filtering IPv4 protocol data packets.
 This document extends RFC 8955 with IPv6 functionality.  It also
 updates RFC 8955 by changing the IANA Flow Spec Component Types
 registry.

Status of This Memo

 This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8956.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

 1.  Introduction
   1.1.  Definitions of Terms Used in This Memo
 2.  IPv6 Flow Specification Encoding in BGP
 3.  IPv6 Flow Specification Components
   3.1.  Type 1 - Destination IPv6 Prefix
   3.2.  Type 2 - Source IPv6 Prefix
   3.3.  Type 3 - Upper-Layer Protocol
   3.4.  Type 7 - ICMPv6 Type
   3.5.  Type 8 - ICMPv6 Code
   3.6.  Type 12 - Fragment
   3.7.  Type 13 - Flow Label (new)
   3.8.  Encoding Examples
 4.  Ordering of Flow Specifications
 5.  Validation Procedure
 6.  IPv6 Traffic Filtering Action Changes
   6.1.  Redirect IPv6 (rt-redirect-ipv6) Type 0x000d
 7.  Security Considerations
 8.  IANA Considerations
   8.1.  Flow Spec IPv6 Component Types
   8.2.  IPv6-Address-Specific Extended Community Flow Spec IPv6
         Actions
 9.  Normative References
 Appendix A.  Example Python Code: flow_rule_cmp_v6
 Acknowledgments
 Contributors
 Authors' Addresses

1. Introduction

 The growing amount of IPv6 traffic in private and public networks
 requires the extension of tools used in IPv4-only networks to also
 support IPv6 data packets.
 This document analyzes the differences between describing IPv6
 [RFC8200] flows and those of IPv4 packets.  It specifies new Border
 Gateway Protocol [RFC4271] encoding formats to enable "Dissemination
 of Flow Specification Rules" [RFC8955] for IPv6.
 This specification is an extension of the base established in
 [RFC8955].  It only defines the delta changes required to support
 IPv6, while all other definitions and operation mechanisms of
 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules" will remain in the main
 specification and will not be repeated here.

1.1. Definitions of Terms Used in This Memo

 AFI:      Address Family Identifier
 AS:       Autonomous System
 NLRI:     Network Layer Reachability Information
 SAFI:     Subsequent Address Family Identifier
 VRF:      Virtual Routing and Forwarding
 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
 "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
 BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
 capitals, as shown here.

2. IPv6 Flow Specification Encoding in BGP

 [RFC8955] defines SAFIs 133 (Dissemination of Flow Specification
 rules) and 134 (L3VPN Dissemination of Flow Specification rules) in
 order to carry the corresponding Flow Specification.
 Implementations wishing to exchange IPv6 Flow Specifications MUST use
 BGP's Capability Advertisement facility to exchange the Multiprotocol
 Extension Capability Code (Code 1), as defined in [RFC4760].  The
 (AFI, SAFI) pair carried in the Multiprotocol Extension Capability
 MUST be (AFI=2, SAFI=133) for IPv6 Flow Specification rules and
 (AFI=2, SAFI=134) for L3VPN Dissemination of Flow Specification
 rules.

3. IPv6 Flow Specification Components

 The encoding of each of the components begins with a Type field (1
 octet) followed by a variable length parameter.  The following
 sections define component types and parameter encodings for IPv6.
 Types 4 (Port), 5 (Destination Port), 6 (Source Port), 9 (TCP Flags),
 10 (Packet Length), and 11 (DSCP), as defined in [RFC8955], also
 apply to IPv6.  Note that IANA has updated the "Flow Spec Component
 Types" registry in order to contain both IPv4 and IPv6 Flow
 Specification component type numbers in a single registry
 (Section 8).

3.1. Type 1 - Destination IPv6 Prefix

 Encoding:  <type (1 octet), length (1 octet), offset (1 octet),
    pattern (variable), padding (variable) >
 This defines the destination prefix to match.  The offset has been
 defined to allow for flexible matching to portions of an IPv6 address
 where one is required to skip over the first N bits of the address.
 (These bits skipped are often indicated as "don't care" bits.)  This
 can be especially useful where part of the IPv6 address consists of
 an embedded IPv4 address, and matching needs to happen only on the
 embedded IPv4 address.  The encoded pattern contains enough octets
 for the bits used in matching (length minus offset bits).
 length:    This indicates the N-th most significant bit in the
            address where bitwise pattern matching stops.
 offset:    This indicates the number of most significant address bits
            to skip before bitwise pattern matching starts.
 pattern:   This contains the matching pattern.  The length of the
            pattern is defined by the number of bits needed for
            pattern matching (length minus offset).
 padding:   This contains the minimum number of bits required to pad
            the component to an octet boundary.  Padding bits MUST be
            0 on encoding and MUST be ignored on decoding.
 If length = 0 and offset = 0, this component matches every address;
 otherwise, length MUST be in the range offset < length < 129 or the
 component is malformed.
 Note: This Flow Specification component can be represented by the
 notation ipv6address/length if offset is 0 or ipv6address/offset-
 length.  The ipv6address in this notation is the textual IPv6
 representation of the pattern shifted to the right by the number of
 offset bits.  See also Section 3.8.

3.2. Type 2 - Source IPv6 Prefix

 Encoding:  <type (1 octet), length (1 octet), offset (1 octet),
    pattern (variable), padding (variable) >
 This defines the source prefix to match.  The length, offset,
 pattern, and padding are the same as in Section 3.1.

3.3. Type 3 - Upper-Layer Protocol

 Encoding:  <type (1 octet), [numeric_op, value]+>
 This contains a list of {numeric_op, value} pairs that are used to
 match the first Next Header value octet in IPv6 packets that is not
 an extension header and thus indicates that the next item in the
 packet is the corresponding upper-layer header (see Section 4 of
 [RFC8200]).
 This component uses the Numeric Operator (numeric_op) described in
 Section 4.2.1.1 of [RFC8955].  Type 3 component values SHOULD be
 encoded as a single octet (numeric_op len=00).
 Note: While IPv6 allows for more than one Next Header field in the
 packet, the main goal of the Type 3 Flow Specification component is
 to match on the first upper-layer IP protocol value.  Therefore, the
 definition is limited to match only on this specific Next Header
 field in the packet.

3.4. Type 7 - ICMPv6 Type

 Encoding:  <type (1 octet), [numeric_op, value]+>
 This defines a list of {numeric_op, value} pairs used to match the
 Type field of an ICMPv6 packet (see also Section 2.1 of [RFC4443]).
 This component uses the Numeric Operator (numeric_op) described in
 Section 4.2.1.1 of [RFC8955].  Type 7 component values SHOULD be
 encoded as a single octet (numeric_op len=00).
 In case of the presence of the ICMPv6 type component, only ICMPv6
 packets can match the entire Flow Specification.  The ICMPv6 type
 component, if present, never matches when the packet's upper-layer IP
 protocol value is not 58 (ICMPv6), if the packet is fragmented and
 this is not the first fragment, or if the system is unable to locate
 the transport header.  Different implementations may or may not be
 able to decode the transport header.

3.5. Type 8 - ICMPv6 Code

 Encoding:  <type (1 octet), [numeric_op, value]+>
 This defines a list of {numeric_op, value} pairs used to match the
 code field of an ICMPv6 packet (see also Section 2.1 of [RFC4443]).
 This component uses the Numeric Operator (numeric_op) described in
 Section 4.2.1.1 of [RFC8955].  Type 8 component values SHOULD be
 encoded as a single octet (numeric_op len=00).
 In case of the presence of the ICMPv6 code component, only ICMPv6
 packets can match the entire Flow Specification.  The ICMPv6 code
 component, if present, never matches when the packet's upper-layer IP
 protocol value is not 58 (ICMPv6), if the packet is fragmented and
 this is not the first fragment, or if the system is unable to locate
 the transport header.  Different implementations may or may not be
 able to decode the transport header.

3.6. Type 12 - Fragment

 Encoding:  <type (1 octet), [bitmask_op, bitmask]+>
 This defines a list of {bitmask_op, bitmask} pairs used to match
 specific IP fragments.
 This component uses the Bitmask Operator (bitmask_op) described in
 Section 4.2.1.2 of [RFC8955].  The Type 12 component bitmask MUST be
 encoded as a single octet bitmask (bitmask_op len=00).
                    0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
                  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
                  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |LF |FF |IsF| 0 |
                  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
                   Figure 1: Fragment Bitmask Operand
 Bitmask values:
 IsF:  Is a fragment other than the first -- match if IPv6 Fragment
       Header (Section 4.5 of [RFC8200]) Fragment Offset is not 0
 FF:   First fragment -- match if IPv6 Fragment Header (Section 4.5 of
       [RFC8200]) Fragment Offset is 0 AND M flag is 1
 LF:   Last fragment -- match if IPv6 Fragment Header (Section 4.5 of
       [RFC8200]) Fragment Offset is not 0 AND M flag is 0
 0:    MUST be set to 0 on NLRI encoding and MUST be ignored during
       decoding

3.7. Type 13 - Flow Label (new)

 Encoding:  <type (1 octet), [numeric_op, value]+>
 This contains a list of {numeric_op, value} pairs that are used to
 match the 20-bit Flow Label IPv6 header field (Section 3 of
 [RFC8200]).
 This component uses the Numeric Operator (numeric_op) described in
 Section 4.2.1.1 of [RFC8955].  Type 13 component values SHOULD be
 encoded as 4-octet quantities (numeric_op len=10).

3.8. Encoding Examples

3.8.1. Example 1

 The following example demonstrates the prefix encoding for packets
 from ::1234:5678:9a00:0/64-104 to 2001:db8::/32 and upper-layer
 protocol tcp.
 +======+======================+=========================+==========+
 | len  | destination          | source                  | ul-proto |
 +======+======================+=========================+==========+
 | 0x12 | 01 20 00 20 01 0d bb | 02 68 40 12 34 56 78 9a | 03 81 06 |
 +------+----------------------+-------------------------+----------+
                               Table 1
 Decoded:
 +=======+============+=================================+
 | Value |            |                                 |
 +=======+============+=================================+
 | 0x12  | length     | 18 octets (if len<240, 1 octet) |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x01  | type       | Type 1 - Dest. IPv6 Prefix      |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x20  | length     | 32 bits                         |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x00  | offset     | 0 bits                          |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x20  | pattern    |                                 |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x01  | pattern    |                                 |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x0d  | pattern    |                                 |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0xb8  | pattern    | (no padding needed)             |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x02  | type       | Type 2 - Source IPv6 Prefix     |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x68  | length     | 104 bits                        |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x40  | offset     | 64 bits                         |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x12  | pattern    |                                 |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x34  | pattern    |                                 |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x56  | pattern    |                                 |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x78  | pattern    |                                 |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x9a  | pattern    | (no padding needed)             |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x03  | type       | Type 3 - Upper-Layer Protocol   |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x81  | numeric_op | end-of-list, value size=1, ==   |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x06  | value      | 06                              |
 +-------+------------+---------------------------------+
                         Table 2
 This constitutes an NLRI with an NLRI length of 18 octets.
 Padding is not needed either for the destination prefix pattern
 (length - offset = 32 bits) or for the source prefix pattern (length
 - offset = 40 bits), as both patterns end on an octet boundary.

3.8.2. Example 2

 The following example demonstrates the prefix encoding for all
 packets from ::1234:5678:9a00:0/65-104 to 2001:db8::/32.
 +========+======================+=========================+
 | length | destination          | source                  |
 +========+======================+=========================+
 | 0x0f   | 01 20 00 20 01 0d b8 | 02 68 41 24 68 ac f1 34 |
 +--------+----------------------+-------------------------+
                           Table 3
 Decoded:
 +=======+=============+=================================+
 | Value |             |                                 |
 +=======+=============+=================================+
 | 0x0f  | length      | 15 octets (if len<240, 1 octet) |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x01  | type        | Type 1 - Dest. IPv6 Prefix      |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x20  | length      | 32 bits                         |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x00  | offset      | 0 bits                          |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x20  | pattern     |                                 |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x01  | pattern     |                                 |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x0d  | pattern     |                                 |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0xb8  | pattern     | (no padding needed)             |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x02  | type        | Type 2 - Source IPv6 Prefix     |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x68  | length      | 104 bits                        |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x41  | offset      | 65 bits                         |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x24  | pattern     |                                 |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x68  | pattern     |                                 |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0xac  | pattern     |                                 |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0xf1  | pattern     |                                 |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
 | 0x34  | pattern/pad | (contains 1 bit of padding)     |
 +-------+-------------+---------------------------------+
                          Table 4
 This constitutes an NLRI with an NLRI length of 15 octets.
 The source prefix pattern is 104 - 65 = 39 bits in length.  After the
 pattern, one bit of padding needs to be added so that the component
 ends on an octet boundary.  However, only the first 39 bits are
 actually used for bitwise pattern matching, starting with a 65-bit
 offset from the topmost bit of the address.

4. Ordering of Flow Specifications

 The definition for the order of traffic filtering rules from
 Section 5.1 of [RFC8955] is reused with new consideration for the
 IPv6 prefix offset.  As long as the offsets are equal, the comparison
 is the same, retaining longest-prefix-match semantics.  If the
 offsets are not equal, the lowest offset has precedence, as this Flow
 Specification matches the most significant bit.
 The code in Appendix A shows a Python3 implementation of the
 resulting comparison algorithm.  The full code was tested with Python
 3.7.2 and can be obtained at <https://github.com/stoffi92/draft-ietf-
 idr-flow-spec-v6/tree/master/flowspec-cmp>.

5. Validation Procedure

 The validation procedure is the same as specified in Section 6 of
 [RFC8955] with the exception that item a) of the validation procedure
 should now read as follows:
 |  a)  A destination prefix component with offset=0 is embedded in
 |      the Flow Specification

6. IPv6 Traffic Filtering Action Changes

 Traffic Filtering Actions from Section 7 of [RFC8955] can also be
 applied to IPv6 Flow Specifications.  To allow an IPv6-Address-
 Specific Route-Target, a new Traffic Filtering Action IPv6-Address-
 Specific Extended Community is specified in Section 6.1 below.

6.1. Redirect IPv6 (rt-redirect-ipv6) Type 0x000d

 The redirect IPv6-Address-Specific Extended Community allows the
 traffic to be redirected to a VRF routing instance that lists the
 specified IPv6-Address-Specific Route-Target in its import policy.
 If several local instances match this criteria, the choice between
 them is a local matter (for example, the instance with the lowest
 Route Distinguisher value can be elected).
 This IPv6-Address-Specific Extended Community uses the same encoding
 as the IPv6-Address-Specific Route-Target Extended Community
 (Section 2 of [RFC5701]) with the Type value always 0x000d.
 The Local Administrator subfield contains a number from a numbering
 space that is administered by the organization to which the IP
 address carried in the Global Administrator subfield has been
 assigned by an appropriate authority.
 Interferes with: All BGP Flow Specification redirect Traffic
 Filtering Actions (with itself and those specified in Section 7.4 of
 [RFC8955]).

7. Security Considerations

 This document extends the functionality in [RFC8955] to be applicable
 to IPv6 data packets.  The same security considerations from
 [RFC8955] now also apply to IPv6 networks.
 [RFC7112] describes the impact of oversized IPv6 header chains when
 trying to match on the transport header; Section 4.5 of [RFC8200]
 also requires that the first fragment must include the upper-layer
 header, but there could be wrongly formatted packets not respecting
 [RFC8200].  IPv6 Flow Specification component Type 3 (Section 3.3)
 will not be enforced for those illegal packets.  Moreover, there are
 hardware limitations in several routers (Section 1 of [RFC8883]) that
 may make it impossible to enforce a policy signaled by a Type 3 Flow
 Specification component or Flow Specification components that match
 on upper-layer properties of the packet.

8. IANA Considerations

 This section complies with [RFC7153].

8.1. Flow Spec IPv6 Component Types

 IANA has created and maintains a registry entitled "Flow Spec
 Component Types".  IANA has added this document as a reference for
 that registry.  Furthermore, the registry has been updated to also
 contain the IPv6 Flow Specification Component Types as described
 below.  The registration procedure remains unchanged.

8.1.1. Registry Template

 Type Value:  contains the assigned Flow Specification component type
              value
 IPv4 Name:   contains the associated IPv4 Flow Specification
              component name as specified in [RFC8955]
 IPv6 Name:   contains the associated IPv6 Flow Specification
              component name as specified in this document
 Reference:   contains references to the specifications

8.1.2. Registry Contents

 Type Value:  0
 IPv4 Name:   Reserved
 IPv6 Name:   Reserved
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  1
 IPv4 Name:   Destination Prefix
 IPv6 Name:   Destination IPv6 Prefix
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  2
 IPv4 Name:   Source Prefix
 IPv6 Name:   Source IPv6 Prefix
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  3
 IPv4 Name:   IP Protocol
 IPv6 Name:   Upper-Layer Protocol
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  4
 IPv4 Name:   Port
 IPv6 Name:   Port
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  5
 IPv4 Name:   Destination Port
 IPv6 Name:   Destination Port
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  6
 IPv4 Name:   Source Port
 IPv6 Name:   Source Port
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  7
 IPv4 Name:   ICMP Type
 IPv6 Name:   ICMPv6 Type
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  8
 IPv4 Name:   ICMP Code
 IPv6 Name:   ICMPv6 Code
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  9
 IPv4 Name:   TCP Flags
 IPv6 Name:   TCP Flags
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  10
 IPv4 Name:   Packet Length
 IPv6 Name:   Packet Length
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  11
 IPv4 Name:   DSCP
 IPv6 Name:   DSCP
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  12
 IPv4 Name:   Fragment
 IPv6 Name:   Fragment
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956
 Type Value:  13
 IPv4 Name:   Unassigned
 IPv6 Name:   Flow Label
 Reference:   RFC 8956
 Type Value:  14-254
 IPv4 Name:   Unassigned
 IPv6 Name:   Unassigned
 Type Value:  255
 IPv4 Name:   Reserved
 IPv6 Name:   Reserved
 Reference:   [RFC8955], RFC 8956

8.2. IPv6-Address-Specific Extended Community Flow Spec IPv6 Actions

 IANA maintains a registry entitled "Transitive IPv6-Address-Specific
 Extended Community Types".  For the purpose of this work, IANA has
 assigned a new value:
    +============+===================================+===========+
    | Type Value | Name                              | Reference |
    +============+===================================+===========+
    | 0x000d     | Flow spec rt-redirect-ipv6 format | RFC 8956  |
    +------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+
          Table 5: Transitive IPv6-Address-Specific Extended
                       Community Types Registry

9. Normative References

 [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
            Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
 [RFC4271]  Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
            Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
 [RFC4443]  Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, Ed., "Internet
            Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet
            Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", STD 89,
            RFC 4443, DOI 10.17487/RFC4443, March 2006,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4443>.
 [RFC4760]  Bates, T., Chandra, R., Katz, D., and Y. Rekhter,
            "Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4", RFC 4760,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC4760, January 2007,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4760>.
 [RFC5701]  Rekhter, Y., "IPv6 Address Specific BGP Extended Community
            Attribute", RFC 5701, DOI 10.17487/RFC5701, November 2009,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5701>.
 [RFC7112]  Gont, F., Manral, V., and R. Bonica, "Implications of
            Oversized IPv6 Header Chains", RFC 7112,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC7112, January 2014,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7112>.
 [RFC7153]  Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "IANA Registries for BGP
            Extended Communities", RFC 7153, DOI 10.17487/RFC7153,
            March 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7153>.
 [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
            2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
            May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
 [RFC8200]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
            (IPv6) Specification", STD 86, RFC 8200,
            DOI 10.17487/RFC8200, July 2017,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200>.
 [RFC8883]  Herbert, T., "ICMPv6 Errors for Discarding Packets Due to
            Processing Limits", RFC 8883, DOI 10.17487/RFC8883,
            September 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8883>.
 [RFC8955]  Loibl, C., Hares, S., Raszuk, R., McPherson, D., and M.
            Bacher, "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules",
            RFC 8955, DOI 10.17487/RFC8955, December 2020,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8955>.

Appendix A. Example Python Code: flow_rule_cmp_v6

 <CODE BEGINS>
 """
 Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors
 of the code. All rights reserved.
 Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license
 terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section
 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
 """
 import itertools
 import collections
 import ipaddress
 EQUAL = 0
 A_HAS_PRECEDENCE = 1
 B_HAS_PRECEDENCE = 2
 IP_DESTINATION = 1
 IP_SOURCE = 2
 FS_component = collections.namedtuple('FS_component',
                                       'component_type value')
 class FS_IPv6_prefix_component:
     def __init__(self, prefix, offset=0,
                  component_type=IP_DESTINATION):
         self.offset = offset
         self.component_type = component_type
         # make sure if offset != 0 that none of the
         # first offset bits are set in the prefix
         self.value = prefix
         if offset != 0:
             i = ipaddress.IPv6Interface(
                 (self.value.network_address, offset))
             if i.network.network_address != \
                 ipaddress.ip_address('0::0'):
                 raise ValueError('Bits set in the offset')
 class FS_nlri(object):
     """
     FS_nlri class implementation that allows sorting.
     By calling .sort() on an array of FS_nlri objects these
     will be sorted according to the flow_rule_cmp algorithm.
     Example:
     nlri = [ FS_nlri(components=[
              FS_component(component_type=4,
                           value=bytearray([0,1,2,3,4,5,6])),
              ]),
              FS_nlri(components=[
              FS_component(component_type=5,
                           value=bytearray([0,1,2,3,4,5,6])),
              FS_component(component_type=6,
                           value=bytearray([0,1,2,3,4,5,6])),
              ]),
            ]
     nlri.sort() # sorts the array according to the algorithm
     """
     def __init__(self, components = None):
         """
         components: list of type FS_component
         """
         self.components = components
     def __lt__(self, other):
         # use the below algorithm for sorting
         result = flow_rule_cmp_v6(self, other)
         if result == B_HAS_PRECEDENCE:
             return True
         else:
             return False
 def flow_rule_cmp_v6(a, b):
     """
     Implementation of the flowspec sorting algorithm in
     RFC 8956.
     """
     for comp_a, comp_b in itertools.zip_longest(a.components,
                                            b.components):
         # If a component type does not exist in one rule
         # this rule has lower precedence
         if not comp_a:
             return B_HAS_PRECEDENCE
         if not comp_b:
             return A_HAS_PRECEDENCE
         # Higher precedence for lower component type
         if comp_a.component_type < comp_b.component_type:
             return A_HAS_PRECEDENCE
         if comp_a.component_type > comp_b.component_type:
             return B_HAS_PRECEDENCE
         # component types are equal -> type-specific comparison
         if comp_a.component_type in (IP_DESTINATION, IP_SOURCE):
             if comp_a.offset < comp_b.offset:
                 return A_HAS_PRECEDENCE
             if comp_a.offset > comp_b.offset:
                 return B_HAS_PRECEDENCE
             # both components have the same offset
             # assuming comp_a.value, comp_b.value of type
             # ipaddress.IPv6Network
             # and the offset bits are reset to 0 (since they are
             # not represented in the NLRI)
             if comp_a.value.overlaps(comp_b.value):
                 # longest prefixlen has precedence
                 if comp_a.value.prefixlen > \
                     comp_b.value.prefixlen:
                     return A_HAS_PRECEDENCE
                 if comp_a.value.prefixlen < \
                     comp_b.value.prefixlen:
                     return B_HAS_PRECEDENCE
                 # components equal -> continue with next
                 # component
             elif comp_a.value > comp_b.value:
                 return B_HAS_PRECEDENCE
             elif comp_a.value < comp_b.value:
                 return A_HAS_PRECEDENCE
         else:
             # assuming comp_a.value, comp_b.value of type
             # bytearray
             if len(comp_a.value) == len(comp_b.value):
                 if comp_a.value > comp_b.value:
                     return B_HAS_PRECEDENCE
                 if comp_a.value < comp_b.value:
                     return A_HAS_PRECEDENCE
                 # components equal -> continue with next
                 # component
             else:
                 common = min(len(comp_a.value),
                              len(comp_b.value))
                 if comp_a.value[:common] > \
                     comp_b.value[:common]:
                     return B_HAS_PRECEDENCE
                 elif comp_a.value[:common] < \
                       comp_b.value[:common]:
                     return A_HAS_PRECEDENCE
                 # the first common bytes match
                 elif len(comp_a.value) > len(comp_b.value):
                     return A_HAS_PRECEDENCE
                 else:
                     return B_HAS_PRECEDENCE
     return EQUAL
 <CODE ENDS>

Acknowledgments

 The authors would like to thank Pedro Marques, Hannes Gredler, Bruno
 Rijsman, Brian Carpenter, and Thomas Mangin for their valuable input.

Contributors

 Danny McPherson
 Verisign, Inc.
 Email: dmcpherson@verisign.com
 Burjiz Pithawala
 Individual
 Email: burjizp@gmail.com
 Andy Karch
 Cisco Systems
 170 West Tasman Drive
 San Jose, CA 95134
 United States of America
 Email: akarch@cisco.com

Authors' Addresses

 Christoph Loibl (editor)
 next layer Telekom GmbH
 Mariahilfer Guertel 37/7
 1150 Vienna
 Austria
 Phone: +43 664 1176414
 Email: cl@tix.at
 Robert Raszuk (editor)
 NTT Network Innovations
 940 Stewart Dr
 Sunnyvale, CA 94085
 United States of America
 Email: robert@raszuk.net
 Susan Hares (editor)
 Huawei
 7453 Hickory Hill
 Saline, MI 48176
 United States of America
 Email: shares@ndzh.com
/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc8956.txt · Last modified: 2020/12/31 21:49 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki