GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc7291

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Boucadair Request for Comments: 7291 France Telecom Category: Standards Track R. Penno ISSN: 2070-1721 D. Wing

                                                                 Cisco
                                                             July 2014
          DHCP Options for the Port Control Protocol (PCP)

Abstract

 This document specifies DHCP (IPv4 and IPv6) options to configure
 hosts with Port Control Protocol (PCP) server IP addresses.  The use
 of DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 depends on the PCP deployment scenarios.  The set
 of deployment scenarios to which DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 can be applied is
 outside the scope of this document.

Status of This Memo

 This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
 (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
 received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7291.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.  Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

Table of Contents

 1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   1.1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
 2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
 3.  DHCPv6 PCP Server Option  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.1.  Format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.2.  DHCPv6 Client Behavior  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
 4.  DHCPv4 PCP Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.1.  Format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.2.  DHCPv4 Client Behavior  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
 5.  DHCP Server Configuration Guidelines  . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
 6.  Dual-Stack Hosts  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
 7.  Hosts with Multiple Interfaces  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
 8.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
 9.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   9.1.  DHCPv6 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   9.2.  DHCPv4 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
 10. Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
 11. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   11.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   11.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10

1. Introduction

 This document defines DHCPv4 [RFC2131] and DHCPv6 [RFC3315] options
 that can be used to configure hosts with PCP server [RFC6887] IP
 addresses.
 This specification assumes a PCP server is reachable with one or
 multiple IP addresses.  As such, a list of IP addresses can be
 returned in the DHCP PCP server option.
 This specification allows returning one or multiple lists of PCP
 server IP addresses.  This is used as a hint to guide the PCP client
 when determining whether to send PCP requests to one or multiple PCP
 servers.  Concretely, the PCP client needs an indication to decide
 whether entries need to be instantiated in all PCP servers (e.g.,
 multi-homing, multiple PCP-controlled devices providing distinct
 services, etc.) or use one IP address from the list (e.g., redundancy
 group scenario, proxy-based model, etc.).  Refer to [PCP-DEPLOYMENT]
 for a discussion on PCP deployment scenarios.
 For guidelines on how a PCP client can use multiple IP addresses and
 multiple PCP servers, see [PCP-SERVER].

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

1.1. Requirements Language

 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

2. Terminology

 This document makes use of the following terms:
 o  "PCP server" denotes a functional element that receives and
    processes PCP requests from a PCP client.  A PCP server can be
    co-located with or be separated from the function (e.g., NAT,
    Firewall) it controls.  Refer to [RFC6887].
 o  "PCP client" denotes a PCP software instance responsible for
    issuing PCP requests to a PCP server.  Refer to [RFC6887].
 o  "DHCP" refers to both DHCPv4 [RFC2131] and DHCPv6 [RFC3315].
 o  "DHCP client" denotes a node that initiates requests to obtain
    configuration parameters from one or more DHCP servers.
 o  "DHCP server" refers to a node that responds to requests from DHCP
    clients.

3. DHCPv6 PCP Server Option

3.1. Format

 The DHCPv6 PCP server option can be used to configure a list of IPv6
 addresses of a PCP server.
 The format of this option is shown in Figure 1.
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |     OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER      |         Option-length         |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                                                               |
 |                     PCP Server IPv6 Address                   |
 |                                                               |
 |                                                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                              ...                              |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                  Figure 1: DHCPv6 PCP Server Option

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

 The fields of the option shown in Figure 1 are as follows:
 o  Option-code: OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER (86; see Section 9.1)
 o  Option-length: Length of the "PCP Server IPv6 Address(es)" field
    in octets.  MUST be a multiple of 16.
 o  PCP Server IPv6 Addresses: Includes one or more IPv6 addresses
    [RFC4291] of the PCP server to be used by the PCP client.  Note,
    IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (Section 2.5.5.2 of [RFC4291]) are
    allowed to be included in this option.
 To return more than one PCP server to the DHCPv6 client (as opposed
 to more than one address for a single PCP server), the DHCPv6 server
 returns multiple instances of OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER.

3.2. DHCPv6 Client Behavior

 To discover one or more PCP servers, the DHCPv6 client requests PCP
 server IP addresses by including OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER in an Option
 Request Option (ORO), as described in Section 22.7 of [RFC3315].
 The DHCPv6 client MUST be prepared to receive multiple instances of
 OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER; each instance is to be treated as a separate
 PCP server.
 If an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address is received in OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER,
 it indicates that the PCP server has the corresponding IPv4 address.
    Note: When presented with the IPv4-mapped prefix, current versions
    of Windows and Mac OS generate IPv4 packets but will not send IPv6
    packets [RFC6052].  Representing IPv4 addresses as IPv4-mapped
    IPv6 addresses follows the same logic as in Section 5 of
    [RFC6887].
 The DHCPv6 client MUST silently discard multicast and host loopback
 addresses [RFC6890] conveyed in OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER.

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

4. DHCPv4 PCP Option

4.1. Format

 The DHCPv4 PCP server option can be used to configure a list of IPv4
 addresses of a PCP server.  The format of this option is illustrated
 in Figure 2.
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |  Code         |     Length    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | List-Length   |   List of     |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  PCP Server   |
       /              IPv4 Addresses   /
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   ---
       | List-Length   |   List of     |    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  PCP Server   |    |
       /              IPv4 Addresses   /    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |
       .             ...               . optional
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |
       | List-Length   |   List of     |    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  PCP Server   |    |
       /              IPv4 Addresses   /    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   ---
                  Figure 2: DHCPv4 PCP Server Option
 The descriptions of the fields are as follows:
 o  Code: OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER (158; see Section 9.2);
 o  Length: Length of all included data in octets.  The minimum length
    is 5.
 o  List-Length: Length of the "List of PCP Server IPv4 Addresses"
    field in octets.  MUST be a multiple of 4.
 o  List of PCP Server IPv4 Addresses: Contains one or more IPv4
    addresses of the PCP server to be used by the PCP client.  The
    format of this field is shown in Figure 3.

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

       0     8     16    24    32    40    48
       +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--
       |  a1 |  a2 |  a3 |  a4 |  a1 |  a2 | ...
       +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--
        IPv4 Address 1          IPv4 Address 2 ...
 This format assumes that an IPv4 address is encoded as a1.a2.a3.a4.
       Figure 3: Format of the List of PCP Server IPv4 Addresses
 OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER can include multiple lists of PCP server IPv4
 addresses; each list is treated as a separate PCP server.  When
 several lists of PCP server IPv4 addresses are to be included, the
 "List-Length" and "List of PCP Server IPv4 Addresses" fields are
 repeated.
 OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER is a concatenation-requiring option.  As such,
 the mechanism specified in [RFC3396] MUST be used if
 OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER exceeds the maximum DHCPv4 option size of 255
 octets.

4.2. DHCPv4 Client Behavior

 To discover one or more PCP servers, the DHCPv4 client requests PCP
 server IP addresses by including OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER in a Parameter
 Request List option [RFC2132].
 The DHCPv4 client MUST be prepared to receive multiple lists of PCP
 server IPv4 addresses in the same DHCPv4 PCP server option; each list
 is to be treated as a separate PCP server.
 The DHCPv4 client MUST silently discard multicast and host loopback
 addresses [RFC6890] conveyed in OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER.

5. DHCP Server Configuration Guidelines

 DHCP servers supporting the DHCP PCP server option can be configured
 with a list of IP addresses of the PCP server(s).  If multiple IP
 addresses are configured, the DHCP server MUST be explicitly
 configured whether all or some of these addresses refer to:
 1.  the same PCP server: the DHCP server returns multiple addresses
     in the same instance of the DHCP PCP server option.

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

 2.  distinct PCP servers: the DHCP server returns multiple lists of
     PCP server IP addresses to the requesting DHCP client (encoded as
     multiple OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVERs or in the same
     OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER); each list is referring to a distinct PCP
     server.  For example, multiple PCP servers may be configured to a
     PCP client in some deployment contexts such as multi-homing.  It
     is out of the scope of this document to enumerate all deployment
     scenarios that require multiple PCP servers to be returned.
 Precisely how DHCP servers are configured to separate lists of IP
 addresses according to which PCP server they address is out of the
 scope of this document.  However, DHCP servers MUST NOT combine the
 IP addresses of multiple PCP servers and return them to the DHCP
 client as if they belong to a single PCP server, and DHCP servers
 MUST NOT separate the addresses of a single PCP server and return
 them as if they belong to distinct PCP servers.  For example, if an
 administrator configures the DHCP server by providing a Fully
 Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) for a PCP server, even if that FQDN
 resolves to multiple addresses, the DHCP server MUST deliver them
 within a single server address block.
 DHCPv6 servers that implement this option and that can populate the
 option by resolving FQDNs will need a mechanism for indicating
 whether to query for A records or only AAAA records.  When a query
 returns A records, the IP addresses in those records are returned in
 the DHCPv6 response as IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.
    Discussion: The motivation for this design is to accommodate
    deployment cases where an IPv4 connectivity service is provided
    while only DHCPv6 is in use (e.g., an IPv4-only PCP server in a
    Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite) context [RFC6333]).
 Since this option requires support for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, a
 DHCPv6 server implementation will not be complete if it does not
 query for A records and represent any that are returned as
 IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses in DHCPv6 responses.  This behavior is
 neither required nor suggested for DHCPv6 options in general: it is
 specific to OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER.  The mechanism whereby DHCPv6
 implementations provide this functionality is beyond the scope of
 this document.
 For guidelines on providing context-specific configuration
 information (e.g., returning a regional-based configuration) and
 information on how a DHCP server might be configured with FQDNs that
 get resolved on demand, see [DHC-CONFIG].

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

6. Dual-Stack Hosts

 A dual-stack host might receive a PCP server option via both DHCPv4
 and DHCPv6.  For guidance on how a DHCP client can handle PCP server
 IP lists for the same network but obtained via different mechanisms,
 see [PCP-SERVER].

7. Hosts with Multiple Interfaces

 A host may have multiple network interfaces (e.g., 3G, IEEE 802.11,
 etc.), each configured differently.  Each PCP server learned MUST be
 associated with the interface via which it was learned.
 Refer to [PCP-SERVER] and Section 8.4 of [RFC6887] for more
 discussion on multi-interface considerations.

8. Security Considerations

 The security considerations in [RFC2131] and [RFC3315] are to be
 considered.  PCP-related security considerations are discussed in
 [RFC6887].
 The PCP server option defined here is applicable when operating under
 the simple threat model (Section 18.1 of [RFC6887]).  Operation under
 the advanced threat model (Section 18.2 of [RFC6887]) may or may not
 be appropriate; analysis of this question is out of the scope of this
 document.

9. IANA Considerations

9.1. DHCPv6 Option

 IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv6 Option Code in the
 registry maintained in
 <http://www.iana.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters>:
                      Option Name          Value
                      -------------------- -----
                      OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER 86

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

9.2. DHCPv4 Option

 IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv4 Option Code in the
 registry maintained in
 <http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters>:
 Option Name          Tag Data Length Meaning
 -------------------- --- ----------- --------------------------------
 OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER 158 Variable;   Includes one or multiple lists
                          the minimum of PCP server IP addresses; each
                          length is   list is treated as a separate
                          5.          PCP server.

10. Acknowledgements

 Many thanks to C. Jacquenet, R. Maglione, D. Thaler, T. Mrugalski,
 T. Reddy, S. Cheshire, M. Wasserman, C. Holmberg, A. Farrel,
 S. Farrel, B. Haberman, and P. Resnick for their review and comments.
 Special thanks to T. Lemon and B. Volz for their reviews and their
 efforts to enhance this specification.

11. References

11.1. Normative References

 [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
            Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
 [RFC2131]  Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC
            2131, March 1997.
 [RFC2132]  Alexander, S. and R. Droms, "DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor
            Extensions", RFC 2132, March 1997.
 [RFC3315]  Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
            and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
            IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.
 [RFC3396]  Lemon, T. and S. Cheshire, "Encoding Long Options in the
            Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4)", RFC 3396,
            November 2002.
 [RFC4291]  Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
            Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006.

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

 [RFC6887]  Wing, D., Cheshire, S., Boucadair, M., Penno, R., and P.
            Selkirk, "Port Control Protocol (PCP)", RFC 6887, April
            2013.
 [RFC6890]  Cotton, M., Vegoda, L., Bonica, R., and B. Haberman,
            "Special-Purpose IP Address Registries", BCP 153, RFC
            6890, April 2013.

11.2. Informative References

 [DHC-CONFIG]
            Lemon, T. and T. Mrugalski, "Customizing DHCP
            Configuration on the Basis of Network Topology", Work in
            Progress, February 2014.
 [PCP-DEPLOYMENT]
            Boucadair, M., "Port Control Protocol (PCP) Deployment
            Models", Work in Progress, April 2014.
 [PCP-SERVER]
            Boucadair, M., Penno, R., Wing, D., Patil, P., and T.
            Reddy, "PCP Server Selection", Work in Progress, April
            2014.
 [RFC6052]  Bao, C., Huitema, C., Bagnulo, M., Boucadair, M., and X.
            Li, "IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators", RFC 6052,
            October 2010.
 [RFC6333]  Durand, A., Droms, R., Woodyatt, J., and Y. Lee, "Dual-
            Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4
            Exhaustion", RFC 6333, August 2011.

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 10] RFC 7291 PCP DHCP Options July 2014

Authors' Addresses

 Mohamed Boucadair
 France Telecom
 Rennes  35000
 France
 EMail: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
 Reinaldo Penno
 Cisco
 USA
 EMail: repenno@cisco.com
 Dan Wing
 Cisco Systems, Inc.
 170 West Tasman Drive
 San Jose, California  95134
 USA
 EMail: dwing@cisco.com

Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc7291.txt · Last modified: 2014/07/15 01:28 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki