rfc:rfc6668
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. Bider Request for Comments: 6668 Bitvise Limited Updates: 4253 M. Baushke Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks, Inc. ISSN: 2070-1721 July 2012
SHA-2 Data Integrity Verification for
the Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol
Abstract
This memo defines algorithm names and parameters for use in some of the SHA-2 family of secure hash algorithms for data integrity verification in the Secure Shell (SSH) protocol. It also updates RFC 4253 by specifying a new RECOMMENDED data integrity algorithm.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6668.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Bider & Baushke Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 6668 Sha2-Transport Layer Protocol July 2012
1. Overview and Rationale
The Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC4251] is a very common protocol for secure remote login on the Internet. Currently, SSH defines data integrity verification using SHA-1 and MD5 algorithms [RFC4253]. Due to recent security concerns with these two algorithms ([RFC6194] and [RFC6151], respectively), implementors and users request support for data integrity verification using some of the SHA-2 family of secure hash algorithms.
1.1. Requirements Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. Data Integrity Algorithms
This memo adopts the style and conventions of [RFC4253] in specifying how the use of new data integrity algorithms are indicated in SSH.
The following new data integrity algorithms are defined:
hmac-sha2-256 RECOMMENDED HMAC-SHA2-256
(digest length = 32 bytes,
key length = 32 bytes)
hmac-sha2-512 OPTIONAL HMAC-SHA2-512
(digest length = 64 bytes,
key length = 64 bytes)
Figure 1
The Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC) mechanism was
originally defined in [RFC2104] and has been updated in [RFC6151].
The SHA-2 family of secure hash algorithms is defined in [FIPS-180-3].
Sample code for the SHA-based HMAC algorithms are available in [RFC6234]. The variants, HMAC-SHA2-224 and HMAC-SHA2-384 algorithms, were considered but not added to this list as they have the same computational requirements of HMAC-SHA2-256 and HMAC-SHA2-512, respectively, and do not seem to be much used in practice.
Bider & Baushke Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 6668 Sha2-Transport Layer Protocol July 2012
Test vectors for use of HMAC with SHA-2 are provided in [RFC4231]. Users, implementors, and administrators may choose to put these new MACs into the proposal ahead of the REQUIRED hmac-sha1 algorithm defined in [RFC4253] so that they are negotiated first.
3. IANA Considerations
This document augments the MAC Algorithm Names in [RFC4253] and [RFC4250].
IANA has updated the "Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Parameters" registry with the following entries:
MAC Algorithm Name Reference Note hmac-sha2-256 RFC 6668 Section 2 hmac-sha2-512 RFC 6668 Section 2
Figure 2
4. Security Considerations
The security considerations of RFC 4253 [RFC4253] apply to this document.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publications: NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-107 [800-107] and NIST SP 800-131A [800-131A] suggest that HMAC-SHA1 and HMAC-SHA2-256 have a security strength of 128 bits and 256 bits, respectively, which are considered acceptable key lengths.
Many users seem to be interested in the perceived safety of using the SHA2-based algorithms for hashing.
5. References
5.1. Normative References
[FIPS-180-3]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
United States of America, "Secure Hash Standard (SHS)",
FIPS PUB 180-3, October 2008, <http://csrc.nist.gov/
publications/fips/fips180-3/fips180-3_final.pdf>.
[RFC2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-
Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104, February
1997.
Bider & Baushke Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 6668 Sha2-Transport Layer Protocol July 2012
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4231] Nystrom, M., "Identifiers and Test Vectors for HMAC-
SHA-224, HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384, and HMAC-SHA-512",
RFC 4231, December 2005.
[RFC4253] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Transport Layer Protocol", RFC 4253, January 2006.
5.2. Informative References
[800-107] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
"Recommendation for Applications Using Approved Hash
Algorithms", NIST Special Publication 800-107, February
2009, <http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/
nistpubs/800-107/NIST-SP-800-107.pdf>.
[800-131A] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
"Transitions: Recommendation for the Transitioning of the
Use of Cryptographic Algorithms and Key Lengths", DRAFT
NIST Special Publication 800-131A, January 2011,
<http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-131A/
sp800-131A.pdf>.
[RFC4250] Lehtinen, S. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Protocol Assigned Numbers", RFC 4250, January 2006.
[RFC4251] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Protocol Architecture", RFC 4251, January 2006.
[RFC6151] Turner, S. and L. Chen, "Updated Security Considerations
for the MD5 Message-Digest and the HMAC-MD5 Algorithms",
RFC 6151, March 2011.
[RFC6194] Polk, T., Chen, L., Turner, S., and P. Hoffman, "Security
Considerations for the SHA-0 and SHA-1 Message-Digest
Algorithms", RFC 6194, March 2011.
[RFC6234] Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
(SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234, May 2011.
Bider & Baushke Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 6668 Sha2-Transport Layer Protocol July 2012
Authors' Addresses
Denis Bider Bitvise Limited Suites 41/42, Victoria House 26 Main Street GI
Phone: +1 869 762 1410 EMail: ietf-ssh2@denisbider.com URI: http://www.bitvise.com/
Mark D. Baushke Juniper Networks, Inc. 1194 N Mathilda Av Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1206 US
Phone: +1 408 745 2952 EMail: mdb@juniper.net URI: http://www.juniper.net/
Bider & Baushke Standards Track [Page 5]
/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc6668.txt · Last modified: 2012/07/06 19:58 by 127.0.0.1