GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


rfc:rfc2164

Network Working Group S. Kille Request for Comments: 2164 Isode Ltd. Obsoletes: 1838 January 1998 Category: Standards Track

  Use of an X.500/LDAP directory to support MIXER address mapping

Status of this Memo

 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998).  All Rights Reserved.

1 MIXER X.400/RFC 822 Mappings

 MIXER (RFC 2156) defines an algorithm for use of a set of global
 mapping between X.400 and RFC 822 addresses [4].  This specification
 defines how to represent and maintain these mappings (MIXER
 Conformant Global Address Mappings of MCGAMs) in an X.500 or LDAP
 directory.  Mechanisms for representing OR Address and Domain
 hierarchies within the DIT are defined in [5, 2].  These techniques
 are used to define two independent subtrees in the DIT, which contain
 the mapping information.  The benefits of this approach are:
 1.  The mapping information is kept in a clearly defined area which
     can be widely replicated in an efficient manner.  The tree is
     constrained to hold only information needed to support the
     mapping.  This is important as gateways need good access to the
     entire mapping.
 2.  It facilitates migration from a table-based approach.
 3.  It handles the issues of "missing components" in a natural
     manner.
        An alternative approach which is not taken is to locate the
        information in the routing subtrees.  The benefits of this
        would be:

Kille Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

      o  It is the "natural" location, and will also help to
         ensure correct administrative authority for a mapping
         definition.
      o  The tree will usually be accessed for routing, and so it
         will be efficient for addresses which are being routed.
        This is not done, as the benefits of the approach proposed are
        greater.
 MCGAMs are global.  A MIXER gateway may use any set of MCGAMs.  A key
 use of the directory is to enable MIXER gateways to share MCGAMs and
 to share the effort of maintaining and publishing MCGAMs.  This
 specification and MIXER also recognise that there is not a single
 unique location for publication of all MCGAMs.  This specification
 allows for multiple sets of MCGAMs to be published.  Each set of
 MCGAMs is published under a single part of the directory.  There are
 four mappings, which are represented by two subtrees located under
 any part of the DIT. For the examples the location defined below is
 used:
 OU=MIXER MCGAMs, O=Zydeco Plc,  C=GB
 These subtree roots are of object class subtree, and use the
 mechanism for representing subtrees defined in [1].
 X.400 to RFC 822 This table gives the equivalence mapping from X.400
     to RFC 822.  There is an OR Address tree under this.  An example
     entry is:
     PRMD=Isode, ADMD=Mailnet, C=FI, CN=X.400 to RFC 822,
     OU=MIXER MCGAMs, O=Zydeco Plc,  C=GB
 RFC 822 to X.400 There is a domain tree under this.  This table holds
     the equivalence mapping from RFC 822 to X.400, and the gateway
     mapping defined in RFC 1327.  An example entry is:
     DomainComponent=ISODE, DomainComponent=COM,
     CN=RFC 822 to X.400,
     OU=MIXER MCGAMs, O=Zydeco Plc,  C=GB
 The values of the table mapping are defined by use of two new object
 classes, as specified in Figure 1.  The objects give pointers to the
 mapped components.

Kille Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

2 Omitted Components

 In MIXER, it is possible to have omitted components in OR Addresses
 on either side of the mapping.  A mechanism to represent such omitted
 components is defined in Figure 2.  The attribute at-or-address-
 component-type is set to the X.500 attribute type associated with the
 omitted component (e.g.,

rFC822ToX400Mapping OBJECT-CLASS ::= {

  SUBCLASS OF {domain-component}
  MAY CONTAIN {
      associatedORAddress|
      associatedX400Gateway}
  ID oc-rfc822-to-x400-mapping}

x400ToRFC822Mapping OBJECT-CLASS ::= {

  SUBCLASS OF {top}
  MAY CONTAIN {                                                   10
      associatedDomain|
      associatedInternetGateway}
  ID oc-x400-to-rfc822-mapping}

associatedORAddress ATTRIBUTE ::= {

  SUBTYPE OF distinguishedName
  SINGLE VALUE
  ID at-associated-or-address}
                                                                  20

associatedX400Gateway ATTRIBUTE ::= {

  SUBTYPE OF mhs-or-addresses
  MULTI VALUE
  ID at-associated-x400-gateway}

associatedDomain ATTRIBUTE ::= {

  SUBTYPE OF name
  WITH SYNTAX caseIgnoreIA5String
  SINGLE VALUE
  ID at-associated-domain}                                        30

associatedInternetGateway ATTRIBUTE ::= {

  SUBTYPE OF name
  WITH SYNTAX caseIgnoreIA5String
  MULTI VALUE
  ID at-associated-internet-gateway}
            Figure 1:  Object Classes for MIXER mappings

Kille Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

omittedORAddressComponent OBJECT-CLASS ::=

      SUBCLASS OF {top}
      MUST Contain {
              oRAddressComponentType
      }
      ID oc-omitted-or-address-component}

oRAddressComponentType ATTRIBUTE ::= {

      SUBTYPE OF  objectIdentifier                                10
      SINGLE VALUE
      ID at-or-address-component-type}
              Figure 2:  Omitted OR Address Component
 at-prmd-name).  This mechanism is for use only within the X.400 to
 RFC 822 subtree and for the at-associated-or-address attribute.

3 Mapping from X.400 to RFC 822

 As an example, consider the mapping from the OR Address:
 P=Isode; A=Mailnet; C=FI
 This would be keyed by the directory entry:
 PRMD=Isode, ADMD=Mailnet, C=FI, CN=X.400 to RFC 822,
 OU=MIXER MCGAMs, O=Zydeco Plc,  C=GB
 and return the mapping from the associatedDomain attribute, which
 gives the domain which this OR address maps to.  This attribute is
 used to define authoritative mappings, which are placed in the open
 community tree.  The manager of an MCGAM shall make the appropriate
 entry.
 The Internet gateway mapping defined in MIXER[4] is provided by the
 associatedInternetGateway attribute.  This value may identify
 multiple possible associated gateways.  This information is looked up
 at the same time as mapped OR addresses.  In effect, this provides a
 fallback mapping, which is found if there is no equivalence mapping.
 Because of the nature of the mapping an OR Address will map to either
 a gateway or a domain, but not both.  Thus, there shall never be both

Kille Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

 an associatedDomain and associatedInternetGateway attribute present
 in the same entry.  Functionally, mapping takes place exactly
 according to MIXER. The longest match is found by the following
 algorithm.
 1.  Take the OR Address, and derive a directory name.  This will be
     the OR Address as far as the lowest OU.
 2.  Look up the entire name derived from the MIXER key in the in the
     X.400 to RFC 822 subtree.  This lookup will either succeed, or it
     will fail and indicate the longest possible match, which can then
     be looked up.
 3.  Check for an associatedDomain or associatedInternetGateway
     attribute in the matched entry.
 The mapping can always be achieved with two lookups.  Because of the
 availability of aliases, some of the table mappings may be
 simplified.  In addition, the directory can support mapping from
 addresses using the numeric country codes.

4 Mapping from RFC 822 to X.400

 There is an analogous structure for mappings in the reverse
 direction.  The domain hierarchy is represented in the DIT according
 to RFC 1279.  The domain:
 ISODE.COM
 Is represented in the DIT as:
 DomainComponent=ISODE, DomainComponent=COM,  CN=RFC 822 to X.400,
 OU=MIXER MCGAMs, O=Zydeco Plc,  C=GB
 This has associated with it the attribute associatedORAddress encoded
 as a distinguished name with a value: PRMD=Isode, ADMD=Mailnet, C=FI
 The X.400 gateway mapping defined in MIXER[4] is provided by the
 associatedX400Gateway attribute.  This value may identify multiple
 possible associated gateways.  This information is looked up at the
 same time as mapped OR addresses.  In effect, this provides a
 fallback mapping, which is found if there is no equivalence mapping.
 Because of the nature of the mapping a domain will map to either a
 gateway or a domain, but not both.  Thus, there shall never be both
 an associatedX400Gateway and associatedORAddress attribute present in
 the same entry.  Functionally, mapping takes place exactly according
 to MIXER. The longest match is found by the following algorithm.

Kille Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

 1.  Derive a directory name from the domain part of the RFC 822
     address.
 2.  Look up this name in the RFC 822 to X.400 subtree to find the
     mapped value (either associatedORAddress or
     associatedX400Gateway.).  If the lookup fails, the error will
     indicate the longest match, which can then be looked up.
 If associatedORAddress is found, this will define the mapped OR
 Address.  The mapping can always be achieved with two lookups.  If an
 associatedX400Gateway is present, the address in question will be
 encoded as a domain defined attribute, relative to the OR Address
 defined by this attribute.  If multiple associatedX400Gateway
 attributes are found, the MTA may select the one it chooses to use.
 Because of the availability of aliases, some of the table mappings
 may be simplified.  In addition, the directory can support mapping
 from addresses using the numeric country codes.

5 Gateway Selection of MCGAMs

 The directory information to support identification of MCGAMs is
 given in Figure 3.  A MIXER gateway simply identifies the an ordered
 lists of MCGAM collections that it will use for lookup.  These are
 referenced by name.  A gateway is not required to use any MCGAMs.
 Where MCGAMs are accessed from multiple sources, it is recommended
 that all of the sources be accessed in order to determine the MCGAM
 which gives the

mixerGateway OBJECT-CLASS ::=

      KIND auxiliary
      SUBCLASS OF {mhs-message-transfer-agent}
      MUST Contain {
              mcgamTables
      }
      ID oc-mixer-gateway}

mcgamTables ATTRIBUTE ::= { 10

      WITH SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF DistinguishedName
      SINGLE VALUE
      ID at-mcgam-tables}
           Figure 3:  Object Classes for MCGAM selection

best match.

Kille Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

6 Acknowledgements

 Acknowledgements for work on this document are given in [3].

References

 [1] Kille, S., "Representing tables and subtrees in the X.500
     directory", RFC 1837, August 1995.
 [2] Kille, S., "Representing the O/R Address hierarchy in the X.500
     directory information tree," RFC 1836, August 1995.
 [3] Kille, S., " X.400-MHS use of the X.500 directory to support
     X.400-MHS routing," RFC 1801, June 1995.
 [4] Kille, S., "MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay):
     Mapping between X.400 and RFC 822/MIME," RFC 2156, January 1998.
 [5] Kille, S., Wahl, M., Grimsatd, A., Huber, R., and S. Sataluri,
     "Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished Names", RFC 2247,
     January 1998.

7 Security Considerations

 This document specifies a means by which the X.500/LDAP directory
 service can direct the translation between X.400 and Internet mail
 addresses.  This can indirectly affect the routing of messages across
 a gateway between X.400 and Internet Mail.  A succesful attack on
 this service could cause incorrect translation of an originator
 address (thus "forging" the originator address), or incorrect
 translation of a recipient address (thus directing the mail to an
 unauthorized recipient, or making it appear to an authorized
 recipient, that the message was intended for recipients other than
 those chosen by the originator).  When cryptographic authentication
 is available for directory responses, clients shall employ those
 mechanisms to verify the authenticity and integrity of those
 responses.

Kille Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

8 Author's Address

 Steve Kille
 Isode Ltd.
 The Dome
 The Square
 Richmond
 TW9 1DT
 England
 Phone:  +44-181-332-9091
 Internet EMail:  S.Kille@ISODE.COM

Kille Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

A Object Identifier Assignment

mhs-ds OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) private(4)

        enterprises(1) isode-consortium (453) mhs-ds (7)}

mapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mhs-ds 4}

oc OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mapping 1} at OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mapping 2}

oc-rfc822-to-x400-mapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {oc 1} 10 oc-x400-to-rfc822-mapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {oc 2} oc-omitted-or-address-component OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {oc 3} oc-mixer-gateway ::= {oc 4}

at-associated-or-address OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 6} at-associated-x400-gateway OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 3} at-associated-domain OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 4} at-or-address-component-type OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 7} at-associated-internet-gateway OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {at 8} at-mcgam-tables ::= {at 9} 20

              Figure 4:  Object Identifier Assignment

Kille Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 2164 X.500/LDAP Directory to Support MIXER January 1998

Full Copyright Statement

 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998).  All Rights Reserved.
 This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
 others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
 or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
 and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
 kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
 included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
 document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
 the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
 Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
 developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
 copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
 followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
 English.
 The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
 revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
 This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
 TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
 BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
 HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Kille Standards Track [Page 10]

/home/gen.uk/domains/wiki.gen.uk/public_html/data/pages/rfc/rfc2164.txt · Last modified: 1998/01/08 00:08 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki