GENWiki

Premier IT Outsourcing and Support Services within the UK

User Tools

Site Tools


man:vfork

VFORK(2) Linux Programmer's Manual VFORK(2)

NAME

     vfork - create a child process and block parent

SYNOPSIS

     #include <sys/types.h>
     #include <unistd.h>
     pid_t vfork(void);
 Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)):
     vfork():
         Since glibc 2.12:
             (_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500) && ! (_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200809L)
                 || /* Since glibc 2.19: */ _DEFAULT_SOURCE
                 || /* Glibc versions <= 2.19: */ _BSD_SOURCE
         Before glibc 2.12:
             _BSD_SOURCE || _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500

DESCRIPTION

 Standard description
     (From  POSIX.1)  The  vfork()  function has the same effect as fork(2),
     except that the behavior is undefined if the process created by vfork()
     either  modifies  any  data other than a variable of type pid_t used to
     store the return value from vfork(), or returns from  the  function  in
     which  vfork()  was called, or calls any other function before success-
     fully calling _exit(2) or one of the exec(3) family of functions.
 Linux description
     vfork(), just like fork(2), creates a  child  process  of  the  calling
     process.  For details and return value and errors, see fork(2).
     vfork()  is  a special case of clone(2).  It is used to create new pro-
     cesses without copying the page tables of the parent process.   It  may
     be  useful  in performance-sensitive applications where a child is cre-
     ated which then immediately issues an execve(2).
     vfork() differs from fork(2) in that the calling  thread  is  suspended
     until  the  child  terminates (either normally, by calling _exit(2), or
     abnormally, after delivery of a fatal signal), or it makes  a  call  to
     execve(2).  Until that point, the child shares all memory with its par-
     ent, including the stack.  The child must not return from  the  current
     function  or  call exit(3) (which would have the effect of calling exit
     handlers established by the parent process and  flushing  the  parent's
     stdio(3) buffers), but may call _exit(2).
     As  with  fork(2), the child process created by vfork() inherits copies
     of various of the caller's process attributes (e.g., file  descriptors,
     signal  dispositions,  and current working directory); the vfork() call
     differs only  in  the  treatment  of  the  virtual  address  space,  as
     described above.
     Signals sent to the parent arrive after the child releases the parent's
     memory (i.e., after the child terminates or calls execve(2)).
 Historic description
     Under Linux, fork(2) is implemented using copy-on-write pages,  so  the
     only  penalty  incurred  by  fork(2) is the time and memory required to
     duplicate the parent's page tables, and to create a unique task  struc-
     ture  for  the  child.   However,  in  the bad old days a fork(2) would
     require making a complete copy of the caller's data space, often  need-
     lessly,  since usually immediately afterward an exec(3) is done.  Thus,
     for greater efficiency, BSD introduced the vfork() system  call,  which
     did  not  fully  copy the address space of the parent process, but bor-
     rowed the parent's memory  and  thread  of  control  until  a  call  to
     execve(2)  or an exit occurred.  The parent process was suspended while
     the child was using its resources.  The use of vfork() was tricky:  for
     example,  not  modifying data in the parent process depended on knowing
     which variables were held in a register.

CONFORMING TO

     4.3BSD; POSIX.1-2001 (but marked OBSOLETE).  POSIX.1-2008  removes  the
     specification of vfork().
     The  requirements put on vfork() by the standards are weaker than those
     put on fork(2), so an implementation where the two  are  synonymous  is
     compliant.   In  particular,  the  programmer cannot rely on the parent
     remaining blocked until the child either terminates or calls execve(2),
     and cannot rely on any specific behavior with respect to shared memory.

NOTES

     Some consider the semantics of vfork() to be an architectural  blemish,
     and  the  4.2BSD  man page stated: "This system call will be eliminated
     when proper system sharing mechanisms are  implemented.   Users  should
     not  depend  on  the memory sharing semantics of vfork() as it will, in
     that case, be made synonymous to fork(2)."  However, even though modern
     memory  management  hardware  has  decreased the performance difference
     between fork(2) and vfork(), there are various reasons  why  Linux  and
     other systems have retained vfork():
  • Some performance-critical applications require the small performance

advantage conferred by vfork().

  • vfork() can be implemented on systems that lack a memory-management

unit (MMU), but fork(2) can't be implemented on such systems.

        (POSIX.1-2008 removed vfork() from the standard; the POSIX rationale
        for the posix_spawn(3) function notes that that function, which pro-
        vides functionality equivalent to fork(2)+exec(3), is designed to be
        implementable on systems that lack an MMU.)
  • On systems where memory is constrained, vfork() avoids the need to

temporarily commit memory (see the description of /proc/sys/vm/over-

        commit_memory  in proc(5)) in order to execute a new program.  (This
        can be especially beneficial where a large parent process wishes  to
        execute  a  small  helper program in a child process.)  By contrast,
        using fork(2) in this scenario requires either committing an  amount
        of  memory  equal to the size of the parent process (if strict over-
        committing is in force) or overcommitting memory with the risk  that
        a process is terminated by the out-of-memory (OOM) killer.
 Caveats
     The  child  process  should take care not to modify the memory in unin-
     tended ways, since such changes will be seen by the parent process once
     the child terminates or executes another program.  In this regard, sig-
     nal handlers can be especially problematic: if a signal handler that is
     invoked  in  the  child  of  vfork()  changes memory, those changes may
     result in an inconsistent process state from  the  perspective  of  the
     parent  process  (e.g.,  memory changes would be visible in the parent,
     but changes to the state of open file descriptors would  not  be  visi-
     ble).
     When  vfork()  is  called  in a multithreaded process, only the calling
     thread is suspended until the child terminates or executes a  new  pro-
     gram.  This means that the child is sharing an address space with other
     running code.  This can be dangerous if another thread  in  the  parent
     process  changes  credentials (using setuid(2) or similar), since there
     are now two processes with different privilege levels  running  in  the
     same  address space.  As an example of the dangers, suppose that a mul-
     tithreaded program running as  root  creates  a  child  using  vfork().
     After  the vfork(), a thread in the parent process drops the process to
     an unprivileged user in order to run some untrusted code (e.g., perhaps
     via plug-in opened with dlopen(3)).  In this case, attacks are possible
     where the parent process uses mmap(2) to map in code that will be  exe-
     cuted by the privileged child process.
 Linux notes
     Fork handlers established using pthread_atfork(3) are not called when a
     multithreaded  program  employing  the  NPTL  threading  library  calls
     vfork().   Fork handlers are called in this case in a program using the
     LinuxThreads threading library.  (See pthreads(7) for a description  of
     Linux threading libraries.)
     A  call  to vfork() is equivalent to calling clone(2) with flags speci-
     fied as:
          CLONE_VM | CLONE_VFORK | SIGCHLD
 History
     The vfork() system call appeared in 3.0BSD.  In 4.4BSD it was made syn-
     onymous to fork(2) but NetBSD introduced it again; see In Linux, it has
     been equivalent to fork(2) until 2.2.0-pre6 or  so.   Since  2.2.0-pre9
     (on  i386,  somewhat later on other architectures) it is an independent
     system call.  Support was added in glibc 2.0.112.

BUGS

     Details of the signal handling are obscure and differ between  systems.
     The  BSD man page states: "To avoid a possible deadlock situation, pro-
     cesses that are children in the middle of  a  vfork()  are  never  sent
     SIGTTOU  or  SIGTTIN  signals; rather, output or ioctls are allowed and
     input attempts result in an end-of-file indication."

SEE ALSO

     clone(2), execve(2), _exit(2), fork(2), unshare(2), wait(2)

COLOPHON

     This page is part of release 4.16 of the Linux  man-pages  project.   A
     description  of  the project, information about reporting bugs, and the
     latest    version    of    this    page,    can     be     found     at
     https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.

Linux 2017-09-15 VFORK(2)

/data/webs/external/dokuwiki/data/pages/man/vfork.txt · Last modified: 2019/05/17 09:47 by 127.0.0.1

Was this page helpful?-12+1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki